Cited by 49Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine ChemistrySynthesis and Properties of Aromatic CompoundsPhotochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies

Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity in the Excited States of Porphyrin Nanorings

Open access
Peeks, Martin D., Gong, Juliane Q., McLoughlin, Kirstie, Kobatake, Takayuki, Haver, Renée, Herz, Laura M., Anderson, Harry L.·2019·The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Aromaticity can be a useful concept for predicting the behavior of excited states. Here we show that π-conjugated porphyrin nanorings exhibit size-dependent excited-state global aromaticity and antiaromaticity for rings containing up to eight porphyrin subunits, although they have no significant global aromaticity in their neutral singlet ground states. Applying Baird’s rule, even rings ([4n] π-electrons) are aromatic in their lowest excited states, whereas the lowest excited states of odd rings ([4n + 2] π-electrons) are antiaromatic. These predictions are borne out by density functional theory (DFT) studies of the nucleus-independent chemical shift (NICS) in the T1 triplet state of each ring, which reveal the critical importance of the triplet delocalization to the emergence of excited-state aromaticity. The singlet excited states (S1) are explored by measurements of the radiative rate and fluorescence peak wavelength, revealing a subtle odd–even alternation as a function of ring size, consistent with symmetry breaking in antiaromatic excited states.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b00623

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LC-ωhPBE (ω = 0.1) generally gives NICS values that are consistent with experimental NMR shifts.

    “We found that LC-ωhPBE (ω = 0.1) generally gives NICS values that are consistent with experimental NMR shifts. 2,4,36”

    From From Macrocycles to Quantum Rings: Does Aromaticity Have a Size Limit? (2021) · cites this paper as [36]

    In the section labeled Abstract (page unavailable), the paper says it calculated NICS values using LC-ωHPBE with ω = 0.1 among other functionals. It does not report that this functional’s NICS values generally agree with experimental NMR shifts; it instead emphasizes that NICS values are sensitive to the chosen functional. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peeks, M. D., Gong, J. Q., McLoughlin, K., Kobatake, T., Haver, R., Herz, L. M., & Anderson, H. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Oxford , , ,
Corresponding author
  • Peeks, Martin D.
  • Anderson, Harry L.
Venue
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
Published
2019-04-05
Volume
10
Issue
8
Pages
2017-2022
ISSN
1948-7185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2932253631
Cited by
49
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • H2020 European Research Council (320969)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/J007161/1, EP/M016110/1)
  • Exeter College, University of Oxford (NA)
  • Nippon Shokubai Ltd. (NA)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies
Keywords
porphyrin nanorings, excited-state aromaticity, antiaromaticity, Baird's rule, nucleus-independent chemical shift, triplet state, singlet excited state, π-conjugated macrocycles, odd-even effect, symmetry breaking, fluorescence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review