Cited by 40Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Biosensing Techniques and ApplicationsBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Peptide Correlation Analysis (PeCorA) Reveals Differential Proteoform Regulation

Open access
Dermit, Maria, Peters-Clarke, Trenton M., Shishkova, Evgenia, Meyer, Jesse G.·2021·Journal of Proteome Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Shotgun proteomics techniques infer the presence and quantity of proteins using peptide proxies produced by cleavage of the proteome with a protease. Most protein quantitation strategies assume that multiple peptides derived from a protein will behave quantitatively similar across treatment groups, but this assumption may be false due to (1) heterogeneous proteoforms and (2) technical artifacts. Here we describe a strategy called peptide correlation analysis (PeCorA) that detects quantitative disagreements between peptides mapped to the same protein. PeCorA fits linear models to assess whether a peptide's change across treatment groups differs from all other peptides assigned to the same protein. PeCorA revealed that ∼15% of proteins in a mouse microglia stress data set contain at least one discordant peptide. Inspection of the discordant peptides shows the utility of PeCorA for the direct and indirect detection of regulated post-translational modifications (PTMs) and also for the discovery of poorly quantified peptides. The exclusion of poorly quantified peptides before protein quantity summarization decreased false-positives in a benchmark data set. Finally, PeCorA suggests that the inactive isoform of prothrombin, a coagulation cascade protease, is more abundant in plasma from COVID-19 patients relative to non-COVID-19 controls. PeCorA is freely available as an R package that works with arbitrary tables of quantified peptides.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00602

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Outlier-exclusion methods improve protein concentration estimates but still report only one protein quantity and ignore peptides that do not agree with that value.

    “While these all demonstrate improved protein concentration estimates, they still only report a single protein quantity and ignore peptides that do not agree with that single value.”
  • Several proposed methods exclude peptide measurements from the aggregate protein quantity when they are outliers relative to other peptides mapping to the same protein-coding gene.

    “The approach of several proposed methods focuses on the exclusion of peptide measurements from inclusion in the aggregate protein quantity if they are outliers from other peptide measurements mapping to the same protein coding gene.(28–33)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dermit, M., Peters-Clarke, T. M., Shishkova, E., & Meyer, J. G.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Meyer, Jesse G.
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2020-12-16
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
1972-1980
ISSN
  • 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3907
OpenAlex
W3112512988
Cited by
40
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Proteome Research (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (T32HG002760)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P41GM108538)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (T15LM007359)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
protein quantification, post-translational modification, mice, proteomics data analysis
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Animals, Humans, Peptides, Protein Processing, Post-Translational, Prothrombin, Microglia, Proteome, Proteomics, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review