The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SLiMAn: An Integrative Web Server for Exploring Short Linear Motif-Mediated Interactions in Interactomes
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Cells express thousands of macromolecules, and their functioning relies on multiple networks of intermolecular interactions. These interactions can be experimentally determine at different spatial and temporal resolutions. But, physical interfaces are not often delineated directly especially in high-throughput experiments. However, numerous three-dimensional structures of complexes have been already solved and sequence conservation allows comparative modeling of additional complexes. A large fraction of protein-protein interactions involves domain and so-called SLiMs (for Short Linear Motifs). Often, SLiMs lie in disordered regions or loops. Their small size and loosely folded nature prevent straightforward detection. SLiMAn (Short Linear Motif Analysis), a new web server is provided to help thorough analysis of interactomics data. Starting from a list of putative interactants such as the output of an interactomics study, SLiMs (from ELM) and SLiM-recognition domains (from Pfam) are extracted and potential pairing are displayed. Additionally, filters are available to dig into the predicted results such as the motif E-value, IUpred2 scoring functions for disorder or BioGRID interaction matches. When structural templates are available, a given SLiM and its recognition domain can be modeled using SCWRL. We illustrate, here, the use of SLiMAn on three distinct examples including one real-case study. We oversee wide-range applications for SLiMAn in the context of massive analysis of protein-protein interactions at proteome-wide scale. This new web server is made freely available at http://sliman.cbs.cnrs.fr .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Burley, S. K., Bhikadiya, C., Bi, C., Bittrich, S., Chen, L., Crichlow, G. V., Christie, C. H., Dalenberg, K., Di Costanzo, L., Duarte, J. M., et al. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa1038 · Cited by 1,581
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.053 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/cr400585q · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2188-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-019-14224-9 · DOI
- 10.15252/msb.202110584 · DOI
- 10.1038/75556 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa1113 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa1074 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/pro.3978 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nmeth.2289 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00066 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkab332 · DOI
- 10.1039/C1MB05231D · DOI
- Kumar M., 2020, Nucleic Acids Res., 48, D296
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa913 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm035 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gky384 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gks1231 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gku1267 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkf436 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nprot.2008.184 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2018.01.017 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.05372-11 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.str.2018.01.017 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aay0543 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.11466 · DOI
- 10.1186/s13045-021-01032-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.05.016 · DOI
- 10.1128/MCB.25.24.11005-11018.2005 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1107740108 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1906360116 · DOI
- 10.1083/jcb.144.5.1019 · DOI
- 10.1093/emboj/cdf446 · DOI
- 10.1091/mbc.e06-08-0668 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.077 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkt1115 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Reys, V., & Labesse, G.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Labesse, Gilles
- Venue
- Journal of Proteome Research
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2022-06-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1654-1663
- ISSN
- 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3907
- OpenAlex
- W4281872574
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Proteome Research (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Institut National de la Sant? et de la Recherche M?dicale
- Universit? de Montpellier
- Ligue Contre le Cancer
- French Infrastructure for Integrated Structural Biology (ANR-10-INBS-0005)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Keywords
- short linear motifs, protein-protein interaction, interactome analysis, protein-protein interaction prediction
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Motifs, Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review