Cited by 3,411

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PhosphoSitePlus, 2014: mutations, PTMs and recalibrations

Hornbeck, Peter V., Zhang, Bin, Murray, Beth, Kornhauser, Jon M., Latham, Vaughan, Skrzypek, Elzbieta·2015·Nucleic Acids Research

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/nar/gku1267

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Based on PhosphoSitePlus, two key residues at the SBP could be potentially modified, including acetylation of K14 in VPS26C and ubiquitylation of K204 in VPS35L, which could disrupt SNX17 binding.

    “For example, based on PhosphoSitePlus41, two key residues at the SBP could be potentially modified, including acetylation of K14 in VPS26C and ubiquitylation of K204 in VPS35L, which could disrupt SNX17 binding.”

    From Structural basis for Retriever-SNX17 assembly and endosomal sorting (2024) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Abstract identifies PhosphoSitePlus as a database of acetylation and ubiquitylation sites, and the PTMVar section discusses how modifications can affect protein interactions. However, our copy does not identify VPS26C K14 or VPS35L K204 as modified sites or assess whether either modification could disrupt SNX17 binding (searched the protein names and residues). (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Miranda, 2002, Phosphorylation and mutations of Ser(16) in human phenylalanine hydroxylase. Kinetic and structural effects, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 40937, 10.1074/jbc.M112197200 · DOI
  2. Gelmann, 2002, Occurrence of NKX3.1 C154T polymorphism in men with and without prostate cancer and studies of its effect on protein function, Cancer Res., 62, 2654
  3. Reimand, 2013, Systematic analysis of somatic mutations in phosphorylation signaling predicts novel cancer drivers, Mol. Syst. Biol., 9, 637, 10.1038/msb.2012.68 · DOI
  4. Ryu, 2009, Genome-wide analysis to predict protein sequence variations that change phosphorylation sites or their corresponding kinases, Nucleic Acids Res., 37, 1297, 10.1093/nar/gkn1008 · DOI
  5. Obenauer, 2003, Scansite 2.0: proteome-wide prediction of cell signaling interactions using short sequence motifs, Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 3635, 10.1093/nar/gkg584 · DOI
  6. Turk, 2006, Determining protein kinase substrate specificity by parallel solution-phase assay of large numbers of peptide substrates, Nat. Protoc., 1, 375, 10.1038/nprot.2006.57 · DOI
  7. Hornbeck, 2012, PhosphoSitePlus: a comprehensive resource for investigating the structure and function of experimentally determined post-translational modifications in man and mouse, Nucleic Acids Res., 40, D261, 10.1093/nar/gkr1122 · DOI
  8. Wu, 2006, The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt): an expanding universe of protein information, Nucleic Acids Res., 34, D187, 10.1093/nar/gkj161 · DOI
  9. Pruitt, 2014, RefSeq: an update on mammalian reference sequences, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D756, 10.1093/nar/gkt1114 · DOI
  10. Griss, 2011, Consequences of the discontinuation of the International Protein Index (IPI) database and its substitution by the UniProtKB ‘complete proteome’ sets, Proteomics, 11, 4434, 10.1002/pmic.201100363 · DOI
  11. Nishi, 2011, Phosphorylation in protein-protein binding: effect on stability and function, Structure, 19, 1807, 10.1016/j.str.2011.09.021 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Smith, 2014, Survey of phosphorylation near drug binding sites in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and their effects, Proteins
  13. Bandy, 2009, Mining protein-protein interactions from published literature using Linguamatics I2E, Methods Mol. Biol., 563, 3, 10.1007/978-1-60761-175-2_1 · DOI
  14. Olsen, 2006, Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks, Cell, 127, 635, 10.1016/j.cell.2006.09.026 · DOI
  15. Uhlen, 2010, Towards a knowledge-based Human Protein Atlas, Nat. Biotechnol., 28, 1248, 10.1038/nbt1210-1248 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Wu, 2013, BioGPS and MyGene.info: organizing online, gene-centric information, Nucleic Acids Res., 41, D561, 10.1093/nar/gks1114 · DOI
  17. Gaudet, 2013, neXtProt: organizing protein knowledge in the context of human proteome projects, J. Proteome Res., 12, 293, 10.1021/pr300830v · DOI · Paper page
  18. Croft, 2014, The Reactome pathway knowledgebase, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, D472, 10.1093/nar/gkt1102 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Saito, 2012, A travel guide to Cytoscape plugins, Nature methods, 9, 1069, 10.1038/nmeth.2212 · DOI
  20. Kan, 2010, Diverse somatic mutation patterns and pathway alterations in human cancers, Nature, 466, 869, 10.1038/nature09208 · DOI
  21. Lienhard, 2008, Non-functional phosphorylations?, Trends Biochem. Sci., 33, 351, 10.1016/j.tibs.2008.05.004 · DOI
  22. Nei, 2002, The Wilhelmine E. Key 2001 Invitational Lecture. Estimation of divergence times for a few mammalian and several primate species, J. Heredity, 93, 157, 10.1093/jhered/93.3.157 · DOI
  23. Miller, 2008, Linear motif atlas for phosphorylation-dependent signaling, Sci. signal., 1, ra2, 10.1126/scisignal.1159433 · DOI
  24. Iakoucheva, 2004, The importance of intrinsic disorder for protein phosphorylation, Nucleic Acids Res., 32, 1037, 10.1093/nar/gkh253 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Gnad, 2011, PHOSIDA 2011: the posttranslationalmodification database, Nucleic Acids Res., 39, D253, 10.1093/nar/gkq1159 · DOI
  26. Calvert, 1999, Allelic and locusheterogeneity in inherited venous malformations, Hum. mol. genets, 8, 1279, 10.1093/hmg/8.7.1279 · DOI
  27. Veugelers, 2004, Comparative PRKAR1Agenotype-phenotype analyses in humans with Carney complex and prkar1ahaploinsufficient mice, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 101, 14222, 10.1073/pnas.0405535101 · DOI
  28. Vacic, 2006, Two Sample Logo: a graphicalrepresentation of the differences between two sets of sequence alignments, Bioinformatics, 22, 1536, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl151 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hornbeck, P. V., Zhang, B., Murray, B., Kornhauser, J. M., Latham, V., & Skrzypek, E.
Venue
Nucleic Acids Research
Published
2014-12-16
Volume
43
Issue
D1
Pages
D512-D520
ISSN
  • 1362-4962
  • 0305-1048
Cited by
3,411
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review