Cited by 70Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

In Vitro Kinase-to-Phosphosite Database (iKiP-DB) Predicts Kinase Activity in Phosphoproteomic Datasets

Open access
Mari, Tommaso, Mösbauer, Kirstin, Wyler, Emanuel, Landthaler, Markus, Drosten, Christian, Selbach, Matthias·2022·Journal of Proteome Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

ABSTRACT Phosphoproteomics routinely quantifies changes in the levels of thousands of phosphorylation sites, but functional analysis of such data remains a major challenge. While databases like PhosphoSitePlus contain information about many phosphorylation sites, the vast majority of known sites are not assigned to any protein kinase. Assigning changes in the phosphoproteome to the activity of individual kinases therefore remains a key challenge.. A recent large-scale study systematically identified in vitro substrates for most human protein kinases. Here, we reprocessed and filtered these data to generate an in vitro Kinase-to-Phosphosite database (iKiP-DB). We show that iKiP-DB can accurately predict changes in kinase activity in published phosphoproteomic datasets for both well-studied and poorly characterized kinases. We apply iKiP-DB to a newly generated phosphoproteomic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 infected human lung epithelial cells and provide evidence for coronavirus-induced changes in host cell kinase activity. In summary, we show that iKiP-DB is widely applicable to facilitate the functional analysis of phosphoproteomic datasets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00198

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Mari, T., Mösbauer, K., Wyler, E., Landthaler, M., Drosten, C., & Selbach, M.
Affiliations
  • Max Delbrück Center (DE)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Selbach, Matthias
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2022-05-24
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
1575-1587
ISSN
  • 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3907
OpenAlex
W4282945860
Cited by
70
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Proteome Research (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium f?r Bildung und Forschung (031L0220B)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
kinase substrates, phosphoproteomics, phosphorylation sites, SARS-CoV-2, lung epithelial cells, coronavirus infection
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Phosphoproteins, Phosphorylation, Protein Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review