Cited by 6Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsProtein Structure and Dynamics

Large-Scale Quantitative Cross-Linking and Mass Spectrometry Provide New Insight into Protein Conformational Plasticity within Organelles, Cells, and Tissues

Open access
Keller, Andrew, Bakhtina, Anna, Bruce, James E.·2025·Journal of Proteome Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

to achieve distinct functional roles. These states include alternative conformations, variable PTMs, and association with interacting protein, nucleotide, and ligand partners. Quantitative chemical cross-linking of live cells, organelles, or tissues together with mass spectrometry provides the relative abundance of cross-link levels formed in two or more compared samples, which depends both on the relative levels of existent protein conformational states in the compared samples as well as the relative likelihood of the cross-link originating from each. Because cross-link conformational state preferences can vary widely, one expects intra-protein cross-link levels from proteins with high conformational plasticity to display divergent quantitation among samples with differing conformational ensembles. Here we use the large volume of quantitative cross-linking data available on the public XLinkDB database to cluster intra-protein cross-links according to their quantitation in many diverse compared samples to provide the first widescale glimpse of cross-links grouped according to the protein conformational state(s) from which they predominantly originate. We further demonstrate how cluster cross-links can be aligned with any protein structure to assess the likelihood that they were derived from it.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jproteome.4c01030

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Keller, A., Bakhtina, A., & Bruce, J. E.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Bruce, James E.
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2025-03-24
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
2017-2025
ISSN
  • 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3907
OpenAlex
W4408786190
Cited by
6
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Proteome Research (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01AG078279, R01HL144778, R35GM136255)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
protein conformational plasticity, protein conformational states, post-translational modification, protein-protein interaction, protein structure alignment, organelles, tissues

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review