Cited by 67Advanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsBarrier Structure and Function StudiesCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus

Proteomes of Paired Human Cerebrospinal Fluid and Plasma: Relation to Blood–Brain Barrier Permeability in Older Adults

Dayon, Loïc, Cominetti, Ornella, Wojcik, Jérôme, Galindo, Antonio Núñez, Oikonomidi, Aikaterini, Henry, Hugues, Migliavacca, Eugenia, Kussmann, Martin +2 more·2019·Journal of Proteome Research

Abstract

The systems-level relationship between the proteomes of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma has not been comprehensively described so far. Recently developed shotgun proteomic workflows allow for deeper characterization of the proteomes from body fluids in much larger sample size. We deployed state-of-the-art mass spectrometry-based proteomics in paired CSF and plasma samples volunteered by 120 elders with and without cognitive impairment to comprehensively characterize and examine compartmental proteome differences and relationships between both body fluids. We further assessed the influence of blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity and tested the hypothesis that BBB breakdown can be identified from CSF and plasma proteome alterations in nondemented elders. We quantified 790 proteins in CSF and 422 proteins in plasma, and 255 of the proteins were identified in both compartments. Pearson's statistics determined 28 proteins with associated levels between CSF and plasma. BBB integrity as defined with the CSF/serum albumin index influenced 76 CSF/plasma protein ratios. In least absolute shrinkage and selection operator models, CSF and plasma proteins improved identification of BBB impairment. In conclusion, we provide here a first comprehensive draft map of interacting human CSF and plasma proteomes, in view of their complex and dynamic compositions, and influence of the BBB.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00809

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dayon, L., Cominetti, O., Wojcik, J., Galindo, A. N., Oikonomidi, A., Henry, H., Migliavacca, E., Kussmann, M., Bowman, G. L., & Popp, J.
Affiliations
  • Nestlé Institute of Health Sciences, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
  • European Organization for Nuclear Research (CH)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Venue
Journal of Proteome Research
Published
2019-01-31
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
1162-1174
ISSN
  • 1535-3893 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-3907
OpenAlex
W2911802547
Cited by
67
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Proteome Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur F?rderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (320030_141179)
  • Nestl? S.A.
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Keywords
cerebrospinal fluid proteome, plasma proteome, blood-brain barrier permeability, older adults, cognitive impairment, dementia, blood-brain barrier disruption
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Blood Proteins, Blood-Brain Barrier, Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteins, Female, Humans, Male, Permeability, Serum Albumin, Mass Spectrometry, Biomarkers, Proteome, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review