Ionizable Lipid Nanoparticles for Therapeutic Base Editing of Congenital Brain Disease
Open accessAbstract
Delivery of mRNA-based therapeutics to the perinatal brain holds great potential in treating congenital brain diseases. However, nonviral delivery platforms that facilitate nucleic acid delivery in this environment have yet to be rigorously studied. Here, we screen a diverse library of ionizable lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) via intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection in both fetal and neonatal mice and identify an LNP formulation with greater functional mRNA delivery in the perinatal brain than an FDA-approved industry standard LNP. Following in vitro optimization of the top-performing LNP (C3 LNP) for codelivery of an adenine base editing platform, we improve the biochemical phenotype of a lysosomal storage disease in the neonatal mouse brain, exhibit proof-of-principle mRNA brain transfection in vivo in a fetal nonhuman primate model, and demonstrate the translational potential of C3 LNPs ex vivo in human patient-derived brain tissues. These LNPs may provide a clinically translatable platform for in utero and postnatal mRNA therapies including gene editing in the brain.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper screens ionizable lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery to the perinatal brain and identifies a C3 LNP that outperforms an FDA-approved MC3 LNP after intracerebroventricular injection in fetal and neonatal mice. Optimized C3 LNPs co-deliver base editors, producing partial biochemical rescue in a neonatal MPS-IH mouse brain, mRNA transfection in a fetal macaque, and base editing in patient-derived human brain tissue.
Key findings
- In a 12-LNP screen, C3 LNPs mediated 17-fold greater mRNA expression in the fetal mouse brain than the industry-standard MC3 LNP (p < 0.05) and 8-fold greater expression in the neonatal brain (p < 0.0001).
- C3 LNPs delivered Cre mRNA primarily to periventricular cells, including microglia lining the ventricles and vicinal astrocytes and neurons, with limited diffusion deep into brain parenchyma.
- In neonatal Idua-W392X MPS-IH mice, C3.MPS LNPs produced low-level on-target base editing, increased IDUA activity to 6.97% of normal in midbrain (p < 0.001) and 11.3% in hippocampus (p < 0.0001), and reduced GAG levels; no editing above baseline was noted in liver or gonads, and no off-target editing above background was found at nine predicted sites.
- C3 LNPs enabled GFP expression in cells lining the lateral ventricles of a 0.61G fetal macaque, remained stable in human CSF, transfected patient-derived neurons with no significant viability effect, and mediated ~4% on-target editing of the human IDUA W402X mutation in precision-cut pediatric brain slices.
Methods
- A 12-member ionizable LNP library was synthesized via Michael addition, characterized for size, PDI, encapsulation, pKa, and zeta potential, and screened by ICV injection of 1 mg/kg luciferase mRNA in E18 fetal and P0 neonatal BALB/c mice using IVIS imaging, histology, and flow cytometry.
- C3 LNPs were optimized in vitro using a 27-formulation DOE in Neuro-2a cells, N:P ratio testing, and ABE7.10 mRNA:sgRNA ratio testing in MPS-IH mouse fibroblasts and neurons; in vivo efficacy and safety were assessed in P0 Idua-W392X mice by NGS, IDUA/GAG assays, cytokine panels, anti-PEG IgM ELISA, and H&E.
- Translational validation used ICV injection in a 0.61G cynomolgus macaque, human CSF stability assays, patient-derived primary brain cells, and precision-cut human brain slices analyzed by NGS.
Limitations
- Stated: on-target editing was low-level; the MPS-IH mouse model lacked a strong neurobehavioral phenotype at the short time points assessed; long-term edit stability, unbiased genomic off-target analyses, long-term anti-PEG IgG response, repeat-dose immune response, and long-term systemic organ toxicity remain to be evaluated; further LNP optimization is needed for non-periventricular structures or specific neural cell types.
- Stated: long-term survival after fetal mouse ICV injection was not assessed in the initial screen; the fetal NHP study was proof-of-principle, and human validation was ex vivo.
- Evident from the text: the NHP experiment used a single fetal macaque, and the human brain tissue data are ex vivo, so in vivo human translation remains untested.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
34 of 42 cited sources checked · 16 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
CNS targeting via prior viral vector approaches was not efficient.
“Although encouraging, CNS targeting via these approaches was not efficient, highlighting the need to evaluate alternative delivery approaches to treat genetic CNS diseases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [7] source
- cites [8] source
The Introduction and Discussion describe viral-vector delivery and gene editing targeted to fetal lung cells, not the CNS. Searches for CNS targeting, brain transduction, and inefficient viral-vector delivery found no passage in our copy assessing the efficiency of prior approaches for CNS targeting. Page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [9] source
- Premisecitation
In utero gene editing takes advantage of normal fetal ontogeny to deliver therapies in a potentially more efficient manner, mitigating genetic disease before pathologic insult.
“In utero gene editing takes advantage of normal fetal ontogeny to deliver therapies in a potentially more efficient manner, mitigating genetic disease before pathologic insult.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] source
- Premisecitation
LNPs for mRNA delivery to the fetal mouse liver following in utero intravascular injection were previously identified.
“We previously identified LNPs for mRNA delivery to the fetal mouse liver following in utero intravascular injection (19).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] source
- Findingown data
NGS of brain genomic DNA did not demonstrate off-target base editing above background at nine previously identified possible off-target sites for the sgRNA targeting the mouse Idua G→A mutation.
“Next-generation sequencing of brain genomic DNA from experimental mice did not demonstrate off-target base editing above background at nine previously identified possible off-target sites for the sgRNA targeting the mouse Idua G→A mutation were assessed by NGS (9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] source
The Results report that NGS found no off-target editing above background, but the tested DNA was from liver, not brain. The Methods and Fig. 1 caption specify the top ten predicted off-target sites, not nine. The paper reports brain on-target editing separately. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Fetal mouse ICV injection has previously been associated with intrauterine mortality due to the technical challenge of this procedure in small animals.
“However, fetal mouse ICV injection has previously been associated with intrauterine mortality due to the technical challenge of this procedure in small animals (27).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] source
The Methods section describes intravenous injection of fetal mice, not ICV injection. The Discussion mentions in utero intracerebroventricular administration only in connection with AAV9 transduction; it does not discuss intrauterine mortality or technical difficulty. Searches for those terms found no supporting passage in our copy (page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Most genetic brain diseases lack reasonably effective therapies due to the complexity of the CNS, the limited regenerative capacity of the tissue, and the difficulty of therapeutics crossing the blood-brain barrier.
“Most genetic brain diseases lack reasonably effective therapies due to the complexity of the CNS, the limited regenerative capacity of the tissue, and the difficulty of therapeutics crossing the blood-brain barrier (37).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] source
The Introduction says that the majority of neurological disorders affecting the CNS lack a cure or reasonably effective treatment, and names CNS complexity, limited regeneration, and difficulty crossing the blood–brain barrier as reasons. It does not establish that this is true specifically of most genetic brain diseases. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Stable editing in multiple organs from 1 month to 6 months after in utero AAV-mediated adenine base editing in the MPS-IH mouse model was previously demonstrated.
“We previously demonstrated stable editing in multiple organs from 1 month to 6 months after in utero AAV-mediated adenine base editing in the MPS-IH mouse model (9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] source
- Findingcitation
The top-performing LNP following in utero ICV mRNA delivery was in the bottom quartile of LNPs for targeting the fetal liver following in utero intravascular mRNA delivery.
“Importantly, the top-performing LNP following in utero ICV mRNA delivery was in the bottom quartile of LNPs for targeting the fetal liver following in utero intravascular mRNA delivery (19).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] source
The Results sections on in utero mRNA delivery and intravascular injection (page not available) compare LNP formulations after vitelline-vein injection and report fetal-liver delivery. Our copy does not report an ICV delivery experiment or identify an ICV top performer as falling in the bottom quartile for liver delivery, so the specific cross-route comparison is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
An optimal weight ratio of base editor mRNA to sgRNA within the lead LNP formulation (3:1) was identified, differing from previous reports of LNPs co-encapsulating base editor mRNA and sgRNA.
“An optimal weight ratio of base editor mRNA to sgRNA within the lead LNP formulation (3:1) was also identified, differing from previous reports of LNPs co-encapsulating base editor mRNA and sgRNA (16, 40).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked - Findingown data
C3 LNPs mediate proof-of-principle mRNA brain transfection in vivo in a fetal nonhuman primate model.
“exhibit proof-of-principle mRNA brain transfection in vivo in a fetal nonhuman primate model”
- Also stated in: § C3 LNPs enable mRNA delivery to cerebral ventricular cells in a fetal macaque · boosted
“Tissue sections of harvested fetal macaque brain demonstrated strong GFP expression in the cells lining the lateral ventricles”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § C3 LNPs enable mRNA delivery to cerebral ventricular cells in a fetal macaque · boosted
- Findingown data
C3 LNPs demonstrate translational potential ex vivo in human patient-derived brain tissues.
“demonstrate the translational potential of C3 LNPs ex vivo in human patient-derived brain tissues”
- Also stated in: § LNPs demonstrate translational potential in patient-derived brain tissues · plain
“NGS demonstrated ~4% on-target editing (Fig. 5H) supporting the ability of C3 LNPs to co-deliver a functional base editor mRNA and sgRNA in an ex vivo human brain tissue model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § LNPs demonstrate translational potential in patient-derived brain tissues · plain
- Findingown data
C3 LNP provides greater functional mRNA delivery in the perinatal mouse brain than an FDA-approved industry standard LNP.
“Here, we screen a diverse library of ionizable lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) via intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection in both fetal and neonatal mice and identify an LNP formulation with greater functional mRNA delivery in the perinatal brain than an FDA-approved industry standard LNP.”
- Also stated in: § LNP-mediated mRNA delivery to the perinatal mouse brain · plain
“The top-performing LNP (C3 LNP) resulted in 17-fold greater mRNA expression in the fetal brain than the industry standard (p < 0.05).”
- Also stated in: § LNP-mediated mRNA delivery to the perinatal mouse brain · plain
“C3 LNPs facilitating 8-fold greater mRNA expression in the neonatal brain than the industry standard LNP (p < 0.0001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § LNP-mediated mRNA delivery to the perinatal mouse brain · plain
- Findingown data
C3.MPS LNPs improve the biochemical phenotype of a lysosomal storage disease in the neonatal mouse brain.
“Following in vitro optimization of the top-performing LNP (C3 LNP) for co-delivery of an adenine base editing platform, we improve the biochemical phenotype of a lysosomal storage disease in the neonatal mouse brain”
- Also stated in: § C3.MPS LNPs mediate biochemical rescue of disease in the neonatal MPS-IH mouse brain · boosted
“At one month, mice treated with C3.MPS LNPs demonstrated increased IDUA activity in the midbrain (p < 0.001, 6.97% of normal) and hippocampus (p < 0.0001, 11.3% of normal) relative to untreated Idua-W392X mice that was associated with a reduction in GAG levels in the respective brain regions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § C3.MPS LNPs mediate biochemical rescue of disease in the neonatal MPS-IH mouse brain · boosted
- Findingown data
NGS demonstrated low-level on-target base editing at the disease-causing locus in several regions of harvested brain tissue from P0 Idua-W392X neonates injected ICV with C3.MPS LNPs.
“Next-generation sequencing (NGS) demonstrated low-level on-target base editing at the disease-causing locus in several regions of harvested brain tissue (Fig. 4B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Relationships were identified between the molar ratio of each excipient and mRNA delivery.
“Although none of these formulations significantly enhanced mRNA delivery compared to the original C3 LNP formulation (Fig. 3B), we did identify relationships between the molar ratio of each excipient and mRNA delivery (Fig. S7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Flow cytometry and cell-specific brain histology confirmed GFP expression in microglia lining the ventricles and vicinal astrocytes and neurons with limited penetration to internal brain structures.
“Flow cytometry (Fig. S5) and cell-specific brain histology (Fig. 2D) confirmed GFP expression in microglia lining the ventricles and vicinal astrocytes and neurons with limited penetration to internal brain structures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
NGS demonstrated ~4% on-target editing in precision cut human brain slices treated with C3.MPSmut LNPs encapsulating BE3 mRNA and sgRNA to introduce a C→T mutation (W402X) in the IDUA gene.
“NGS demonstrated ~4% on-target editing (Fig. 5H) supporting the ability of C3 LNPs to co-deliver a functional base editor mRNA and sgRNA in an ex vivo human brain tissue model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The top-performing LNP (C3 LNP) resulted in 17-fold greater mRNA expression in the fetal brain than the industry standard (p < 0.05).
“The top-performing LNP (C3 LNP) resulted in 17-fold greater mRNA expression in the fetal brain than the industry standard (p < 0.05).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In this library, LNP zeta potentials ranged from 15.6 mV to 2.43 mV.
“In this library, LNP zeta potentials ranged from 15.6 mV to 2.43 mV (Fig. 1C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
A 3:1 ratio of ABE7.10 mRNA:sgRNA within C3 LNPs resulted in the highest level of editing in MPS-IH mouse fibroblasts.
“A 3:1 ratio of ABE7.10 mRNA:sgRNA within C3 LNPs resulted in the highest level of editing (Fig. 3E) and was subsequently used in a dose-response study for on-target editing in MPS-IH mouse neurons, as well as for toxicity studies in MPS-IH mouse fibroblasts and neurons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Encapsulation efficiencies of the LNP library ranged from 79.9% to 97.6%.
“Encapsulation efficiencies were also high, ranging from 79.9% to 97.6% (Fig. 1C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
All LNP formulations yielded greater mRNA delivery than injection of naked mRNA.
“All LNP formulations yielded greater mRNA delivery than injection of naked mRNA, confirming that LNP encapsulation protects mRNA cargo from systemic degradation and facilitates intracellular delivery (Fig. 1F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
None of the LNPs demonstrated significant diffusion deep into the brain parenchyma beyond the periventricular space.
“None of the LNPs demonstrated significant diffusion deep into the brain parenchyma beyond the periventricular space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MC3.MPS LNP treated mice demonstrated a significant increase in serum IP10, IL-9, and GM-CSF levels relative to mice treated with C3.MPS LNPs.
“Furthermore, MC3.MPS LNP treated mice demonstrated a significant increase in serum IP10, IL-9 (pleiotropic cytokine with both pro- and anti-inflammatory function), and GM-CSF (regulator of macrophage production) levels relative to mice treated with C3.MPS LNPs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Four pro-inflammatory cytokines, G-CSF, IL-1a, IP10, and MCP-1, were elevated in C3.MPS LNP and MC3.MPS treated neonates compared to PBS-treated controls.
“Four pro-inflammatory cytokines, G-CSF (regulator of neutrophil production), IL-1a (driver of inflammation), IP10 (immune cell chemotaxis), and MCP-1 (monocyte migration) were elevated in C3.MPS LNP and MC3.MPS treated neonates compared to PBS-treated controls (Fig. 4E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All LNP formulations had a pKa value between 5.05 and 7.14.
“All LNP formulations had a pKa value between 5.05 and 7.14 (Fig. 1C), which is within an acceptable range for in vivo nucleic acid delivery (22).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
IVIS imaging demonstrated a range of mRNA delivery and luciferase expression in the brain with all LNPs in the library.
“IVIS imaging of both the whole fetus (Fig. 1E) as well as individually dissected fetal brains (Fig. 1F) demonstrated a range of mRNA delivery and luciferase expression in the brain with all LNPs in the library.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Tissue sections of harvested fetal macaque brain demonstrated strong GFP expression in the cells lining the lateral ventricles, similar to the region transfected in R26mT/mG mouse studies.
“Tissue sections of harvested fetal macaque brain demonstrated strong GFP expression in the cells lining the lateral ventricles, similar to the region transfected in our previous R26mT/mG mouse studies (Fig. 5C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
C3 LNP-treated neonates had strong GFP expression in periventricular areas and adjacent cortical structures.
“C3 LNP-treated neonates had strong GFP expression in periventricular areas and adjacent cortical structures (Fig. 2B and 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A 2.5-fold increase in serum anti-PEG IgM antibodies in C3.MPS LNP-treated adult mice compared to PBS-treated adult mice (p < 0.001) was observed.
“In contrast, a 2.5-fold increase in serum anti-PEG IgM antibodies in C3.MPS LNP-treated adult mice compared to PBS-treated adult mice (p < 0.001) was observed (Fig. 4F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Incubation of C3.MPS LNPs in human serum resulted in significant aggregation and clustering.
“In contrast, incubation of C3.MPS LNPs in human serum resulted in significant aggregation and clustering (Fig. 5D).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Relative to PBS-treated brain tissue sections, there was no evidence of gross structural damage or inflammatory cell infiltration near the injection site in LNP-treated brains.
“Relative to PBS-treated brain tissue sections, there was no evidence of gross structural damage or inflammatory cell infiltration near the injection site in LNP-treated brains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No significant difference in anti-PEG IgM levels was observed between C3.MPS LNP-treated and PBS-treated neonates.
“No significant difference in anti-PEG IgM levels was observed between C3.MPS LNP-treated and PBS-treated neonates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
None of the 9 representative LNP formulations significantly enhanced mRNA delivery compared to the original C3 LNP formulation in Neuro-2a cells.
“Although none of these formulations significantly enhanced mRNA delivery compared to the original C3 LNP formulation (Fig. 3B), we did identify relationships between the molar ratio of each excipient and mRNA delivery (Fig. S7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
IVIS imaging of individually dissected fetal livers demonstrated minimal luciferase expression after treatment with any of the LNPs in this library.
“Of note, IVIS imaging of individually dissected fetal livers demonstrated minimal luciferase expression after treatment with any of the LNPs in this library (Fig. S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In this study, C3 LNPs did not result in morphological changes to the fetal or neonatal murine brain parenchyma on gross examination.
“In this study, C3 LNPs did not result in morphological changes to the fetal or neonatal murine brain parenchyma on gross examination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ICV administration of C3 LNPs in the mouse neonate did not elicit an anti-PEG IgM antibody response.
“ICV administration of C3 LNPs in the mouse neonate, which immunologically mimics a mid- to late-gestation human fetus, also did not elicit an anti-PEG IgM antibody response, in contrast to that seen following injection of the same LNPs in the adult mouse brain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
C3 LNP-mediated base editing of the gene implicated in MPS-IH was demonstrated in precision-cut slices of human cortical brain tissue.
“Finally, we generated precision-cut slices of human cortical brain tissue and demonstrated C3 LNP-mediated base editing of the gene implicated in MPS-IH.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
C3 LNPs did not retain their physiochemical properties upon incubation in human serum ex vivo.
“we assessed the stability of C3 LNPs in human CSF and demonstrated that LNPs retained their physiochemical properties upon incubation in CSF but not human serum ex vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
C3 LNPs retained their physiochemical properties upon incubation in human CSF ex vivo.
“we assessed the stability of C3 LNPs in human CSF and demonstrated that LNPs retained their physiochemical properties upon incubation in CSF but not human serum ex vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The acute serum cytokine response following C3 LNP treatment of MPS-IH neonates was lower than that produced by FDA-approved LNPs encapsulating the same base editing platform.
“however, this response was lower than that which was produced by FDA-approved LNPs encapsulating the same base editing platform.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Assessment of the acute serum cytokine response following C3 LNP treatment of MPS-IH neonates exhibited elevated levels of a small subset of cytokines.
“Assessment of the acute serum cytokine response following C3 LNP treatment of MPS-IH neonates exhibited elevated levels of a small subset of cytokines”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ICV delivery of C3 LNPs encapsulating a base editing platform to treat the mouse model of MPS-IH did not result in demonstrable editing in the liver and gonads.
“In addition, ICV delivery of C3 LNPs encapsulating a base editing platform to treat the mouse model of MPS-IH did not result in demonstrable editing in the liver and gonads.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Injection of the same LNPs in the adult mouse brain elicited an anti-PEG IgM antibody response.
“ICV administration of C3 LNPs in the mouse neonate, which immunologically mimics a mid- to late-gestation human fetus, also did not elicit an anti-PEG IgM antibody response, in contrast to that seen following injection of the same LNPs in the adult mouse brain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
C3 LNPs may provide a clinically translatable platform for in utero and postnatal mRNA therapies, including gene editing, in the brain.
“These LNPs may provide a clinically translatable platform for in utero and postnatal mRNA therapies, including gene editing, in the brain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Survival after neonatal ICV injection was 100% in IDUA-W392X neonates.
“Survival after neonatal ICV injection was 100% in IDUA-W392X neonates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Studies suggest that 1% of normal IDUA enzyme activity may be sufficient to transition from severe Hurler's syndrome to the milder Scheie syndrome.
“However, since studies suggest that 1% of normal IDUA enzyme activity may be sufficient to transition from severe Hurler’s syndrome to the milder Scheie syndrome (38),”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Clarke L. A, 2021
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductown data
Successful delivery of C3.GFP LNPs was confirmed by observation of transient ventricular swelling.
“Successful delivery was confirmed by observation of transient ventricular swelling (Fig. 5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The mRNA delivery performance of C3 LNPs in the perinatal brain translates to a larger scale animal model more developmentally similar to a human.
“This result demonstrates that the mRNA delivery performance of C3 LNPs in the perinatal brain translates to a larger scale animal model more developmentally similar to a human, while highlighting the need for future optimization to enhance targeting deeper regions of the non-human primate brain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Survival at 4 hours after neonatal ICV injection was 100% in Balb/c neonates.
“Survival at 4 hours after neonatal ICV injection, the terminal analysis time point, was 100% in Balb/c neonates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Efficient targeting of periventricular cells is a potential target to produce therapeutic proteins for secretion into CSF circulation and utilize a paracrine effect for treatment of disease.
“Despite low whole brain gene modulation and delivery to specific brain cells or internal brain structures, efficient targeting of periventricular cells is a potential target to produce therapeutic proteins for secretion into CSF circulation and utilize a paracrine effect for treatment of disease.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
C3 LNPs can co-deliver a functional base editor mRNA and sgRNA in an ex vivo human brain tissue model.
“NGS demonstrated ~4% on-target editing (Fig. 5H) supporting the ability of C3 LNPs to co-deliver a functional base editor mRNA and sgRNA in an ex vivo human brain tissue model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Long-term survival post-injection was not assessed in the in vivo screen.
“In this in vivo screen, long-term survival post-injection was not assessed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
For diseases with multi-organ pathology, complete treatment would require additional systemic delivery approaches beyond ICV C3 LNPs.
“Thus, while this delivery modality holds promise for the CNS pathology of MPS-IH and other genetic diseases limited to CNS pathology, diseases with multi-organ pathology would require additional systemic delivery approaches for complete treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The distinct abundance and identity of proteins in CSF versus serum may contribute to the difference in stability and performance of LNPs in these two biological fluids.
“which may contribute to the difference in stability, and subsequently performance, of LNPs in these two biological fluids.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
These findings highlight the variability of cell-type specific in vivo LNP targeting dependent on LNP characteristics.
“These findings highlight the variability of cell-type specific in vivo LNP targeting dependent on LNP characteristics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Base editing facilitated by a non-viral delivery carrier was demonstrated in the NHP fetal brain and primary human brain tissue.
“Taken together, these experiments provide the foundation for additional translational studies and demonstrate base editing facilitated by a non-viral delivery carrier in the NHP fetal brain and primary human brain tissue.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The abundance and identity of proteins in the CSF are distinct relative to the serum.
“Both the abundance and identity of proteins in the CSF are distinct relative to the serum (44)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] source
- May combine two claims. 41
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 18
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe 12-LNP library had hydrodynamic diameters ranging from 67.8 to 128.3 nm with a maximum polydispersity value of 0.154, indicating small and relatively monodisperse LNPs.
“Hydrodynamic diameter for all LNP formulations – measured via dynamic light scattering intensity – ranged from 67.8 to 128.3 nm with a maximum polydispersity value of 0.154 (Fig. 1B), indicating small and relatively monodisperse LNPs (PDI < 0.3) (19).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] source
The Results section, “Characterization of the LNP library” (Fig. 2C; page not provided), reports 14 formulations with DLS-measured diameters of 64.6–135.2 nm, not 12 formulations ranging from 67.8–128.3 nm. It also says one formulation had PDI above 0.3, contradicting the claimed maximum of 0.154, although the others were described as monodisperse. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationViral delivery platforms can be limited by pre-existing viral immunity, transgene size constraints, undesired vector integration, and adverse events related to the viral vector.
“Although viral vectors are a promising approach to deliver gene editing technology to the CNS, viral delivery platforms can be limited by pre-existing viral immunity, transgene size constraints, undesired vector integration, and adverse events related to the viral vector (10–12).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIonizable lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are a promising non-viral delivery platform for mRNA nanomedicines and have been used to deliver siRNA and CRISPR-based gene editing therapies to the liver in postnatal mouse, non-human primate, and clinical studies with encouraging results.
“Ionizable lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are a promising non-viral delivery platform for mRNA nanomedicines (13, 14) that have been used to deliver siRNA and CRISPR-based gene editing therapies to the liver in postnatal mouse, non-human primate, and clinical studies with encouraging results (15–18).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 6 sources checked- cites [13] source
- cites [14] source
- cites [15] source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [16] source
- cites [17] source
- cites [18] source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn utero gene editing has rescued the lethal phenotype of hereditary tyrosinemia type 1, improved the pulmonary phenotype of surfactant protein C deficiency, and ameliorated metabolic, musculoskeletal, and cardiac disease in mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS-IH, Hurler syndrome) in mouse models.
“Previously, we demonstrated the therapeutic potential of in utero gene editing in mouse models of human diseases, rescuing the lethal phenotype of hereditary tyrosinemia type 1, improving the pulmonary phenotype of surfactant protein C deficiency, and ameliorating metabolic, musculoskeletal, and cardiac disease in mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS-IH, Hurler syndrome) (7–9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationAdvances in mRNA-based gene editing tools, including CRISPR-Cas9 and base editing platforms, provide an opportunity for one-and-done treatments for monogenic diseases.
“Advances in mRNA-based gene editing tools, including CRISPR-Cas9 and base editing platforms, provide an opportunity for “one-and-done” treatments for monogenic diseases (5, 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [5] source
The Abstract describes CRISPR-Cas9 editing as a potential treatment for monogenic disorders, and the Delivery section discusses mRNA delivery of editing nucleases. Our copy does not discuss base-editing platforms or establish that treatment would require only one administration; those parts of the claim are unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [6] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFor many genetic CNS diseases, pathology begins before birth and is difficult to reverse after onset, resulting in significant morbidity by the time of or shortly after birth.
“Furthermore, the pathology of many genetic CNS diseases begins before birth and is difficult to reverse after onset resulting in significant morbidity by the time of or shortly after birth (3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] source
The ‘In utero gene therapy: Rationale and supporting animal studies’ section says irreversible neurologic pathology begins before birth in neuronopathic Gaucher disease. The Conclusions also identify severe morbidity and irreversible early pathology as characteristics of potential target diseases. The paper does not establish that many genetic CNS diseases cause significant morbidity by birth or shortly afterward; it notes that a child can appear normal at birth despite fetal pathology. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSimilar to patients with MPS-IH, Idua-W392X mice have undetectable α-L-iduronidase (IDUA) enzyme activity and elevated tissue glycosaminoglycans (GAGs).
“Similar to patients with MPS-IH, Idua-W392X mice have undetectable α-L- iduronidase (IDUA) enzyme activity and elevated tissue glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) (32).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe ideal N:P ratio is distinct for each ionizable lipid.
“The ideal N:P ratio is known to be distinct for each ionizable lipid (18).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] source
The Multi-tail ionizable lipids section discusses optimizing LNP composition, but does not identify an ideal N:P ratio or say that it differs for each ionizable lipid. Searches for N:P, nitrogen-to-phosphate ratio, and lipid-specific charge-ratio optimization found no passage addressing that point; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOne of the most common IDUA disease-causing mutations is amenable to correction by adenine base editing resulting in restoration of IDUA enzyme activity and improvement in disease pathology including the reduction in lysosomal accumulation of GAGs.
“One of the most common IDUA disease-causing mutations is amenable to correction by adenine base editing resulting in restoration of IDUA enzyme activity and improvement in disease pathology including the reduction in lysosomal accumulation of GAGs (9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe molar ratios at which LNP components are combined can be optimized for specific applications to better encapsulate nucleic acid cargo, enhance uptake by target cells, or alter biodistribution and protein corona formation.
“The molar ratios at which the components of LNPs are combined can be optimized for specific applications to better encapsulate nucleic acid cargo, enhance uptake by target cells, or alter biodistribution and protein corona formation (28).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] source
The Introduction and Discussion state that LNP component ratios can be optimized for delivery and biodistribution, and that lipid-to-cargo ratios can improve encapsulation. The Results link excipient ratios to mRNA delivery, but do not measure target-cell uptake. The Discussion treats differences in protein corona formation as a hypothesis requiring future study, not an established effect of changing molar ratios. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationModulating excipient molar ratios improves in vitro delivery to fetal lung cells and corresponds to enhanced in vivo performance following intra-amniotic LNP injection.
“In prior work, we demonstrated that modulating excipient molar ratios improves in vitro delivery to fetal lung cells and corresponds to enhanced in vivo performance following intra-amniotic LNP injection (28).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe ionizable lipid is a major determinant of intracellular delivery by both directly complexing with mRNA and facilitating endosomal escape, while cholesterol provides stability and enables membrane fusion, DOPE supplies structural support, and PEG reduces aggregation and non-specific endocytosis.
“While the ionizable lipid – in this case C3 – is a major determinant of intracellular delivery by both directly complexing with mRNA and facilitating endosomal escape, the remaining excipients also play critical roles: cholesterol provides stability and enables membrane fusion, DOPE supplies structural support, and PEG reduces aggregation and non-specific endocytosis (29).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe low-level editing observed via the current approach may beneficially affect the neurobehavioral phenotype in MPS-IH, although assessment of this outcome is limited in the current study due to the lack of a strong neurobehavioral phenotype in this mouse model at the short time points assessed.
“the low-level editing observed via the current approach may beneficially affect the neurobehavioral phenotype in MPS-IH, although assessment of this outcome is limited in the current study due to the lack of a strong neurobehavioral phenotype in this mouse model at the short time points assessed (9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA mouse model of MPS-IH was chosen to study LNP-mediated perinatal delivery of a gene editing therapy since the neurodevelopmental pathology in patients with this disease starts prior to or shortly after birth, is irreversible, and is resistant to currently available treatments, including enzyme replacement therapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplant.
“In this work, a mouse model of MPS-IH was chosen to study LNP-mediated perinatal delivery of a gene editing therapy since the neurodevelopmental pathology in patients with this disease starts prior to or shortly after birth, is irreversible, and is resistant to currently available treatments, including enzyme replacement therapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (9).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe immune system of a P0 mouse is immature, similar to that of a developing human fetus, and a mature immune system, as is present in an adult mouse, is capable of producing an anti-PEG IgM response to C3.MPS LNPs.
“These data are consistent with our previous study demonstrating that the immune system of a P0 mouse is immature (35) – similar to that of a developing human fetus – and imply that a mature immune system, as is present in an adult mouse, is capable of producing an anti-PEG IgM response to C3.MPS LNPs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe N:P ratio impacts both nucleic acid delivery and toxicity, with higher ratios leading to diminishing returns in cellular transfection due to increased cell death.
“Previous studies have demonstrated that the N:P ratio impacts both nucleic acid delivery and toxicity, with higher ratios leading to diminishing returns in cellular transfection due to increased cell death (31).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] source
The Introduction (page not provided) says high N:P ratios can enhance intracellular delivery and in vitro gene expression, with higher toxicity as a trade-off. It does not say that cell death causes diminishing returns in cellular transfection; the toxicity it describes is systemic and linked to interactions with blood components. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSince congenital brain pathology often begins before birth, fetal intervention provides a therapeutic opportunity to mitigate irreversible disease burden.
“Since congenital brain pathology often begins before birth, fetal intervention provides a therapeutic opportunity to mitigate irreversible disease burden (3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] source
The ‘In utero gene therapy: Rationale and supporting animal studies’ section says irreversible neurologic pathology begins in utero in neuronopathic Gaucher disease and describes fetal gene therapy mitigating neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in mice. This supports the therapeutic opportunity, but the paper does not establish that congenital brain pathology generally or often begins before birth. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe molecular composition of an LNP modulates the endogenous proteins that bind the nanoparticle and govern its biological fate.
“Prior studies have demonstrated that the molecular composition of an LNP modulates the endogenous proteins that bind the nanoparticle and govern its biological fate (43).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn vivo, C3 LNPs formulated at 10:1 and 20:1 N:P ratios had similar performance in the neonatal brain to the initial screening study, with no significant difference between the LNPs formulated at different N:P ratios.
“IVIS imaging revealed that while both LNP formulations had similar performance in the neonatal brain to the initial screening study, there was no significant difference between the LNPs formulated at different N:P ratios (Fig. 3D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataC3.GFP LNPs resulted in a high transfection efficiency with no significant effect on viability of neurons cultured from cerebral cortex tissue of two pediatric patients.
“C3.GFP LNPs resulted in a high transfection efficiency (Fig. 5F) with no significant effect on viability (Fig. 5G) of these cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIVIS imaging of neonatal brains confirmed the performance trends observed in the fetal brain, with C3 LNPs facilitating 8-fold greater mRNA expression in the neonatal brain than the industry standard LNP (p < 0.0001).
“IVIS imaging of neonatal brains confirmed the performance trends observed in the fetal brain (Fig. 1F and 1G), with C3 LNPs facilitating 8-fold greater mRNA expression in the neonatal brain than the industry standard LNP (p < 0.0001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEach ionizable lipid produced LNPs with variable performance, demonstrating the crucial role of this component for mRNA delivery.
“Each ionizable lipid produced LNPs with variable performance, demonstrating the crucial role of this component for mRNA delivery (Fig. 1F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe zeta potential of C3.MPS LNPs did not change at increasing concentrations of human CSF, implying that these LNPs avoid significant protein adhesion that can reduce cellular uptake.
“However, the zeta potential of C3.MPS LNPs did not change at increasing concentrations of human CSF (Fig. S10C), implying that these LNPs avoid significant protein adhesion that can reduce cellular uptake.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNo editing above baseline was noted in genomic DNA isolated from the liver and gonads, demonstrating similar brain specific delivery observed in the initial LNP library screen.
“Notably, no editing above baseline was noted in genomic DNA isolated from the liver and gonads (Fig. S9), demonstrating similar brain specific delivery observed in our initial LNP library screen.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn vivo transfection efficacy in the fetal brain showed trends with decreasing pKa, increasing size, and increasing zeta potential.
“Interestingly, we observed trends for in vivo transfection efficacy in the fetal brain with decreasing pKa, increasing size, and increasing zeta potential (Fig. S2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt one month, mice treated with C3.MPS LNPs demonstrated increased IDUA activity in the midbrain (p < 0.001, 6.97% of normal) and hippocampus (p < 0.0001, 11.3% of normal) relative to untreated Idua-W392X mice, associated with a reduction in GAG levels in the respective brain regions.
“At one month, mice treated with C3.MPS LNPs demonstrated increased IDUA activity in the midbrain (p < 0.001, 6.97% of normal) and hippocampus (p < 0.0001, 11.3% of normal) relative to untreated Idua-W392X mice that was associated with a reduction in GAG levels in the respective brain regions (Figs. 4C and 4D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAlthough whole brain distribution was similar across LNPs, the magnitude of GFP expression was proportional to LNP performance in initial screening studies (C3 > C2 > C1).
“Although we observed similarities in whole brain distribution across LNPs, the magnitude of GFP expression and was proportional to LNP performance in our initial screening studies (C3 > C2 > C1) (Fig. 2B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataC3 LNPs encapsulating ABE7.10 mRNA and sgRNA demonstrated dose-dependent A→G editing of the target adenine in the mouse Idua gene and no toxicity in MPS-IH mouse fibroblasts or neurons.
“These studies demonstrated dose-dependent A→G editing of the target adenine in the mouse Idua gene (Fig. 3F) and no toxicity in either cell type (Fig. S8C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDespite low-level LNP-mediated adenine base editing at the pathogenic locus in the neonatal MPS-IH mouse brain, partial restoration of IDUA enzyme activity (7-11% of normal) and reduction in the accumulation of GAGs in multiple brain regions were observed.
“Despite low-level LNP-mediated adenine base editing at the pathogenic locus in the neonatal MPS-IH mouse brain, we observed partial restoration of IDUA enzyme activity (7–11% of normal) and reduction in the accumulation of GAGs in multiple brain regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter ICV administration of C3 LNPs to E18 Balb/c fetuses, strong luciferase expression was observed in the fetal brain but no significant expression in the heart, lung, intestine, liver, spleen, or kidney.
“We observed strong luciferase expression in the fetal brain but no significant expression in the heart, lung, intestine, liver, spleen, or kidney (Fig. S4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn comparison to the original N:P ratio of 10:1, C3 LNPs formulated at an N:P ratio of 20:1 had a significant improvement in mRNA delivery (p < 0.001) albeit with enhanced toxicity.
“In comparison to the original N:P ratio of 10:1, LNPs formulated at an N:P ratio of 20:1 had a significant improvement in mRNA delivery (Fig. 3C, p < 0.001) albeit with enhanced toxicity (Fig. S8B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNo significant change in size or polydispersity of C3.MPS LNPs incubated in human CSF was observed, and this result was confirmed over a one-week time course, supporting the stability of the LNP.
“No significant change in size or polydispersity of C3.MPS LNPs incubated in human CSF was observed (Fig. 5D and Fig. 5E), and this result was confirmed over a one-week time course, supporting the stability of our LNP.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataModulation of LNP lipid ratio parameters suggested that the original LNP formulation mediated efficient mRNA delivery in neuronal origin cells.
“Modulation of LNP lipid ratio parameters suggested that our original LNP formulation mediated efficient mRNA delivery.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe trends observed for in vivo transfection efficiency of the LNP library in the fetal mouse brain matched those seen in the neonatal mouse brain, validating that the neonatal mouse model can be used to approximate LNP performance in the fetal mouse CNS.
“More broadly, the trends observed for in vivo transfection efficiency of our LNP library in the fetal mouse brain matched those seen in the neonatal mouse brain, validating that the neonatal mouse model can be used to approximate LNP performance in the fetal mouse CNS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLNPs containing the C3 ionizable lipid were small (<100 nm), monodisperse (<0.20 PDI), well-encapsulated (>90%), and on the lower end of the known pKa range (~5) for efficient mRNA delivery.
“LNPs containing the C3 ionizable lipid were small (<100 nm), monodisperse (<0.20 PDI), well-encapsulated (>90%), and on the lower end of the known pKa range (~5) for efficient mRNA delivery.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataC3 LNPs delivered mRNA to the fetal NHP brain via ICV administration at a gestational age akin to a mid-gestation human fetus, resulting in transfection of the brain ventricular lining.
“To this end, we evaluated the ability of C3 LNPs to deliver mRNA to the fetal brain in the NHP via ICV administration at a gestational age akin to a mid-gestation human fetus and demonstrated transfection of the brain ventricular lining akin to our studies in the mouse model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataSurvival after neonatal ICV injection was 100% in R26mT/mG neonates.
“Survival after neonatal ICV injection was 100% in R26mT/mG neonates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis proof-of-concept study supports the safety and efficacy of LNPs for delivery of mRNA-based gene editing therapies to the CNS.
“This proof-of-concept study supports the safety and efficacy of LNPs for delivery of mRNA-based gene editing therapies to the CNS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenThrough correction of underlying pathogenic mutations, gene editing technologies offer a potential curative strategy for genetic diseases with CNS features after a single treatment.
“Through correction of underlying pathogenic mutations, gene editing technologies offer a potential curative strategy for genetic diseases with CNS features after a single treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataWhile C3.MPS LNPs produce an acute serum cytokine response that is generally pro-inflammatory, this reaction is at a lower level than that produced by FDA-approved MC3 LNPs.
“Taken together, these data suggest that while C3.MPS LNPs do produce an acute serum cytokine response that is generally pro-inflammatory, this reaction is at a lower level than that produced by FDA-approved MC3 LNPs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataLNP encapsulation protects mRNA cargo from systemic degradation and facilitates intracellular delivery.
“All LNP formulations yielded greater mRNA delivery than injection of naked mRNA, confirming that LNP encapsulation protects mRNA cargo from systemic degradation and facilitates intracellular delivery (Fig. 1F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningNon-human primate models have more structurally similar brain anatomy to humans and allow for the evaluation of the delivery approach, a minimally invasive, ultrasound-guided ICV, that would be used clinically.
“Relative to fetal and neonatal mouse models, non-human primate models have more structurally similar brain anatomy to humans and allow for the evaluation of the delivery approach, a minimally invasive, ultrasound-guided ICV, that would be used clinically.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataC3.MPS LNPs facilitate partial biochemical correction of disease in the neonatal Idua-W392X mouse brain, demonstrating potential for mitigation of brain disease in MPS-IH.
“These data suggest that C3.MPS LNPs facilitate partial biochemical correction of disease in the neonatal Idua-W392X mouse brain, demonstrating potential for mitigation of brain disease in MPS-IH.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe macaque experiments were conducted at the SingHealth Experimental Medicine Centre, accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International.
“The macaque experiments were conducted at the SingHealth Experimental Medicine Centre, accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIn addition to the identity of the ionizable lipid, a range of variables during LNP formulation are known to influence in vivo delivery of gene editing platforms.
“In addition to the identity of the ionizable lipid, a range of variables during LNP formulation are known to influence in vivo delivery of gene editing platforms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe improvement in IDUA and GAG levels is likely due to secretion of IDUA enzyme into the CNS by a small number of corrected periventricular cells, which is supported by studies in neonatal reporter mice demonstrating the predominance of editing confined to periventricular cells after intraventricular injection of LNPs.
“The improvement in IDUA and GAG levels is likely due to secretion of IDUA enzyme into the CNS by a small number of corrected periventricular cells, which is supported by our studies in neonatal reporter mice demonstrating the predominance of editing confined to periventricular cells after intraventricular injection of LNPs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll human specimens were collected following Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (IRB 21-018470).
“All human specimens were collected following Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (IRB 21-018470).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll mouse animal protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (IACUC 21-001417) and followed guidelines in the NIH's Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
“All mouse animal protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (IACUC 21-001417) and followed guidelines in the NIH’s Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhile the lead LNP engineered in this study holds promise for CNS diseases in which a paracrine effect of restoring normal protein function following periventricular cell targeting is adequate, further LNP optimization is required to apply this delivery modality to a broader range of diseases involving non-periventricular structures or specific neural cell types.
“Thus, while the lead LNP engineered in this study holds promise for CNS diseases in which a paracrine effect of restoring normal protein function following periventricular cell targeting is adequate, further LNP optimization is required to apply this delivery modality to a broader range of diseases involving non-periventricular structures or specific neural cell types.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenMacaque procedures were performed in accordance with the IACUC at the National University of Singapore and Singapore Health Services (IACUC 2009-SHS-512).
“Macaque procedures were performed in accordance with the IACUC at the National University of Singapore and Singapore Health Services (IACUC 2009-SHS-512).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenAll quantifications represent the mean and standard error of the mean (SEM) acquired from at least three biological replicates (cells or animals) per treatment group.
“All quantifications represent the mean and standard error of the mean (SEM) acquired from at least three biological replicates (cells or animals) per treatment group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe engineered LNP platform demonstrated efficacy and safety in a mouse model of a human disease, in the fetal NHP model, and in patient-derived brain tissues.
“Here, we engineer an LNP platform to begin to address this need, demonstrating its efficacy and safety in a mouse model of a human disease, in the fetal NHP model, and in patient-derived brain tissues.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The Idua-W392X mouse model recapitulates human MPS-IH.
The paper relies on this without support.
Non-viral delivery platforms that facilitate nucleic acid delivery to the perinatal brain have not yet been rigorously studied.
“However, non-viral delivery platforms that facilitate nucleic acid delivery in this environment have yet to be rigorously studied.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The applicability of LNPs for delivering gene editing platforms to the perinatal brain remains to be determined.
“However, the applicability of LNPs for genetic CNS diseases – as delivery vehicles for gene editing platforms in the perinatal brain – remains to be determined.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The optimal parameters to produce C3 LNPs specifically for base editing applications in the brain have not previously been determined.
“However, the optimal parameters to produce C3 LNPs specifically for base editing applications in the brain have not previously been determined.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Postnatal day 0 mouse ICV injections are technically easier, associated with good long-term survival, and approximate the CNS development of a mid-to-late gestation human fetus.
“In contrast, postnatal day 0 (P0) mouse ICV injections are technically easier, associated with good long-term survival, and still approximate the CNS development of a mid-to-late gestation human fetus.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The applicability of gene editing therapies in the perinatal CNS is currently limited by the lack of a safe and effective nucleic acid delivery platform.
“However, the applicability of gene editing therapies in the perinatal CNS is currently limited by the lack of a safe and effective nucleic acid delivery platform.”
The paper relies on this without support.
MPS-IH is caused by genetic mutations in the IDUA gene resulting in IDUA enzyme deficiency.
“MPS-IH is caused by genetic mutations in the IDUA gene resulting in IDUA enzyme deficiency.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Non-viral mediated delivery of mRNA therapeutics to the CNS has been less robustly studied than virally-mediated gene delivery.
“Although previous work has evaluated virally-mediated gene delivery to the CNS, non-viral mediated delivery of mRNA therapeutics to the CNS has been less robustly studied and offers potential safety advantages over viral vector delivery approaches.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The mouse neonate immunologically mimics a mid- to late-gestation human fetus.
“ICV administration of C3 LNPs in the mouse neonate, which immunologically mimics a mid- to late-gestation human fetus, also did not elicit an anti-PEG IgM antibody response, in contrast to that seen following injection of the same LNPs in the adult mouse brain.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The NHP gestational age used is akin to a mid-gestation human fetus.
“at a gestational age akin to a mid-gestation human fetus”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Idua-W392X mouse model recapitulates human MPS-IH.
“ICV delivery of C3 LNPs encapsulating a base editing platform to treat the mouse model of MPS-IH”
Cites
Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery
Hou, X., Zaks, T., Langer, R., & Dong, Y. (2021) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00358-0 · Cited by 4,076 · see citing works
Genome editing with CRISPR–Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors
Anzalone, A. V., Koblan, L. W., & Liu, D. R. (2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0561-9 · Cited by 2,237 · see citing works
CRISPR-Cas9 In Vivo Gene Editing for Transthyretin Amyloidosis
Gillmore, J. D., Gane, E., Taubel, J., Kao, J., Fontana, M., Maitland, M. L., Seitzer, J., O’Connell, D., Walsh, K. R., Wood, K., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2107454 · Cited by 1,766 · see citing works
Viral vector platforms within the gene therapy landscape
Bulcha, J. T., Wang, Y., Ma, H., Tai, P. W. L., & Gao, G. (2021) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-021-00487-6 · Cited by 1,404 · see citing works
Drug delivery systems for RNA therapeutics
Paunovska, K., Loughrey, D., & Dahlman, J. E. (2022) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-021-00439-4 · Cited by 1,349 · see citing works
Therapeutic genome editing: prospects and challenges
Cox, D. B. T., Platt, R. J., & Zhang, F. (2015) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3793 · Cited by 1,336 · see citing works
On the mechanism of tissue-specific mRNA delivery by selective organ targeting nanoparticles
Dilliard, S. A., Cheng, Q., & Siegwart, D. J. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2109256118 · Cited by 1,018 · see citing works
Pardi, N., Tuyishime, S., Muramatsu, H., Kariko, K., Mui, B. L., Tam, Y. K., Madden, T. D., Hope, M. J., & Weissman, D. (2015) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.08.007 · Cited by 1,014 · see citing works
Self-citationIn vivo CRISPR base editing of PCSK9 durably lowers cholesterol in primates
Musunuru, K., Chadwick, A. C., Mizoguchi, T., Garcia, S. P., DeNizio, J. E., Reiss, C. W., Wang, K., Iyer, S., Dutta, C., Clendaniel, V., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03534-y · Cited by 793 · see citing works
Kauffman, K. J., Dorkin, J. R., Yang, J. H., Heartlein, M. W., DeRosa, F., Mir, F. F., Fenton, O. S., & Anderson, D. G. (2015) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02497 · Cited by 785 · see citing works
Lipid Nanoparticle Assisted mRNA Delivery for Potent Cancer Immunotherapy
Oberli, M. A., Reichmuth, A. M., Dorkin, J. R., Mitchell, M. J., Fenton, O. S., Jaklenec, A., Anderson, D. G., Langer, R., & Blankschtein, D. (2017) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03329 · Cited by 719 · see citing works
Self-citationAn ionizable lipid toolbox for RNA delivery
Han, X., Zhang, H., Butowska, K., Swingle, K. L., Alameh, M.-G., Weissman, D., & Mitchell, M. J. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27493-0 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
Self-citationThe landscape of mRNA nanomedicine
Huang, X., Kong, N., Zhang, X., Cao, Y., Langer, R., & Tao, W. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-02061-1 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
Stereotaxic gene delivery in the rodent brain
Cetin, A. H., Komai, S., Eliava, M., Seeburg, P. H., & Osten, P. (2006) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.450 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Hajj, K. A., Ball, R. L., Deluty, S. B., Singh, S. R., Strelkova, D., Knapp, C. M., & Whitehead, K. A. (2019) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201805097 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Emerging mRNA technologies: delivery strategies and biomedical applications
Xiao, Y., Tang, Z., Huang, X., Chen, W., Zhou, J., Liu, H., Liu, C., Kong, N., & Tao, W. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00617g · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Kim, J., Grunke, S. D., Levites, Y., Golde, T. E., & Jankowsky, J. L. (2014) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/51863 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
High-dose AAV gene therapy deaths
(2020) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0642-9 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Ionizable lipid nanoparticles for in utero mRNA delivery
Riley, R. S., Kashyap, M. V., Billingsley, M. M., White, B., Alameh, M.-G., Bose, S. K., Zoltick, P. W., Li, H., Zhang, R., Cheng, A. Y., et al. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba1028 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Self-citationIn utero CRISPR-mediated therapeutic editing of metabolic genes
Rossidis, A. C., Stratigis, J. D., Chadwick, A. C., Hartman, H. A., Ahn, N. J., Li, H., Singh, K., Coons, B. E., Li, L., Lv, W., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0184-6 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Self-citationNeurology of inherited glycosylation disorders
Freeze, H. H., Eklund, E. A., Ng, B. G., & Patterson, M. C. (2012) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70040-6 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Anti-PEG antibodies compromise the integrity of PEGylated lipid-based nanoparticles via complement
Sentí, M. E., de Jongh, C. A., Dijkxhoorn, K., Verhoef, J. J. F., Szebeni, J., Storm, G., Hack, C. E., Schiffelers, R. M., Fens, M. H. A. M., & Boross, P. (2021) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.11.042 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Adenine base editing in an adult mouse model of tyrosinaemia
Song, C.-Q., Jiang, T., Richter, M., Rhym, L. H., Koblan, L. W., Zafra, M. P., Schatoff, E. M., Doman, J. L., Cao, Y., Dow, L. E., et al. (2019) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-019-0357-8 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Basha, G., Novobrantseva, T. I., Rosin, N. L., Tam, Y. Y. C., Hafez, I. M., Wong, M., Sugo, T., Ruda, V. M., Qin, J., Klebanov, B., et al. (2011) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/mt.2011.190 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Billingsley, M. M., Hamilton, A. G., Mai, D., Patel, S. K., Swingle, K. L., Sheppard, N. C., June, C. H., & Mitchell, M. J. (2021) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c02503 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Self-citationSzebeni, J., Storm, G., Ljubimova, J. Y., Castells, M., Phillips, E. J., Turjeman, K., Barenholz, Y., Crommelin, D. J. A., & Dobrovolskaia, M. A. (2022) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-022-01071-x · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Intracerebroventricular Delivery as a Safe, Long-Term Route of Drug Administration
Cohen-Pfeffer, J. L., Gururangan, S., Lester, T. L., Lim, D. A., Shaywitz, A. J., Westphal, M., & Slavc, I. (2016) · Pediatric Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2016.10.022 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Fetal gene therapy for neurodegenerative disease of infants
Massaro, G., Mattar, C. N. Z., Wong, A. M. S., Sirka, E., Buckley, S. M. K., Herbert, B. R., Karlsson, S., Perocheau, D. P. B., Burke, D. G., Heales, S., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0106-7 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Self-citationGene Therapy Tools for Brain Diseases
Ingusci, S., Verlengia, G., Soukupova, M., Zucchini, S., & Simonato, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.00724 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
In utero gene editing for monogenic lung disease
Alapati, D., Zacharias, W. J., Hartman, H. A., Rossidis, A. C., Stratigis, J. D., Ahn, N. J., Coons, B., Zhou, S., Li, H., Singh, K., et al. (2019) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aav8375 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Self-citationSchwarz, N., Uysal, B., Welzer, M., Bahr, J. C., Layer, N., Löffler, H., Stanaitis, K., Ashraf, H. P., Weber, Y. G., Hedrich, U. B. S., et al. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.48417 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
In vivo cytidine base editing of hepatocytes without detectable off-target mutations in RNA and DNA
Villiger, L., Rothgangl, T., Witzigmann, D., Oka, R., Lin, P. J. C., Qi, W., Janjuha, S., Berk, C., Ringnalda, F., Beattie, M. B., et al. (2021) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-020-00671-z · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Gary, D. J., Min, J., Kim, Y., Park, K., & Won, Y. (2013) · Macromolecular Bioscience · doi:10.1002/mabi.201300046 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Dayon, L., Cominetti, O., Wojcik, J., Galindo, A. N., Oikonomidi, A., Henry, H., Migliavacca, E., Kussmann, M., Bowman, G. L., & Popp, J. (2019) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00809 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
In utero adenine base editing corrects multi-organ pathology in a lethal lysosomal storage disease
Bose, S. K., White, B. M., Kashyap, M. V., Dave, A., De Bie, F. R., Li, H., Singh, K., Menon, P., Wang, T., Teerdhala, S., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24443-8 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationDelivery technologies for in utero gene therapy
Palanki, R., Peranteau, W. H., & Mitchell, M. J. (2021) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.11.002 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationAmniotic fluid stabilized lipid nanoparticles for in utero intra-amniotic mRNA delivery
Swingle, K. L., Billingsley, M. M., Bose, S. K., White, B., Palanki, R., Dave, A., Patel, S. K., Gong, N., Hamilton, A. G., Alameh, M.-G., et al. (2022) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.10.031 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationWang, D., Shukla, C., Liu, X., Schoeb, T. R., Clarke, L. A., Bedwell, D. M., & Keeling, K. M. (2010) · Molecular Genetics and Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2009.08.002 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Preventing preterm birth: the past limitations and new potential of animal models
Ratajczak, C. K., Fay, J. C., & Muglia, L. J. (2010) · Disease Models & Mechanisms · doi:10.1242/dmm.001701 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
The Future of In Utero Gene Therapy
Peranteau, W. H., & Flake, A. W. (2020) · Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40291-020-00445-y · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationMattar, C. N., Wong, A. M. S., Hoefer, K., Alonso-Ferrero, M. E., Buckley, S. M. K., Howe, S. J., Cooper, J. D., Waddington, S. N., Chan, J. K. Y., & Rahim, A. A. (2015) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.14-269092 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Self-citationNational Cancer Institute (2020) · Definitions · doi:10.32388/swp1kj · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Eisengart, J. B., Pierpont, E. I., Kaizer, A. M., et al. (2019) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41436-019-0522-1 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Isolation and culture of functional adult human neurons from neurosurgical brain specimens
Park, T. I.-H., Schweder, P., Lee, K., Dieriks, B. V., Jung, Y., Smyth, L., Rustenhoven, J., Mee, E., Heppner, P., Turner, C., et al. (2020) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcaa171 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Akaishi, T., Onishi, E., Abe, M., Toyama, H., Ishizawa, K., Kumagai, M., Kubo, R., Nakashima, I., Aoki, M., Yamauchi, M., et al. (2019) · Fluids and Barriers of the CNS · doi:10.1186/s12987-019-0128-7 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Riley, J. S., McClain, L. E., Stratigis, J. D., Coons, B. E., Ahn, N. J., Li, H., Loukogeorgakis, S. P., Fachin, C. G., Dias, A. I. B. S., Flake, A. W., et al. (2020) · Blood Advances · doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001208 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationAdeno-Associated Virus Delivery Limitations for Neurological Indications
Benatti, H. R., & Gray‐Edwards, H. L. (2022) · Human Gene Therapy · doi:10.1089/hum.2022.29196.hrb · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The 60-year evolution of lipid nanoparticles for nucleic acid delivery
Cullis, P. R., & Felgner, P. L. (2024) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-024-00977-6 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
Recent advances in nanoparticulate RNA delivery systems
Witten, J. J., Hu, Y., Langer, R., & Anderson, D. G. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2307798120 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
“…the placenta via IV delivery for treat - ment of placental disorders (54), to the fetus via injection into the vitelline vein for in utero treatment of genetic disorders (55), to the brain for base editing (56), to the muscle for vac - cines (57), and to T cells ex vivo for T cell engineering (58).”
Mechanisms and Barriers in Nanomedicine: Progress in the Field and Future Directions
Anchordoquy, T. J., Artzi, N., Balyasnikova, I. V., Barenholz, Y., La-Beck, N. M., Brenner, J. S., Chan, W. C. W., Decuzzi, P., Exner, A. A., Gabizón, A., et al. (2024) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c00182 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationGene therapy for CNS disorders: modalities, delivery and translational challenges
Gao, J., Gunasekar, S., Xia, Z. J., Shalin, K., Jiang, C., Chen, H., Lee, D., Lee, S., Pisal, N. D., Luo, J. N., et al. (2024) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-024-00829-7 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
“Non-viral delivery systems offer multiple advantages over their viral vector counterparts, owing to their high tunability, reduced immunogenicity and low cost of production 309,310 .”
Han, E. L., Padilla, M. S., Palanki, R., Kim, D., Mrksich, K., Li, J. J., Tang, S., Yoon, I.-C., & Mitchell, M. J. (2024) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c03509 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Self-citationPadilla, M. S., Mrksich, K., Wang, Y., Haley, R. M., Li, J. J., Han, E. L., El-Mayta, R. D., Kim, E. H., Dias, S., Gong, N., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-55137-6 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
“LNPs have also advanced the fi eld of gene editing through the delivery of mRNAs encoding for Cas9 11 and base editors 12 .”
Self-citationInfluence of ionizable lipid tail length on lipid nanoparticle delivery of mRNA of varying length
Mrksich, K., Padilla, M. S., Joseph, R. A., Han, E. L., Kim, D., Palanki, R., Xu, J., & Mitchell, M. J. (2024) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.37705 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“IL cores containing piperazine rings have been widely used in RNA LNPs. 19,38,40,41 48 In addition to the IL, it has been shown that other lipid components also influence LNP transfection.”
BackgroundSelf-citationWu, Y., & Angelova, A. (2023) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano13233004 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Lipid Nanoparticles for Delivery of CRISPR Gene Editing Components
Wu, F., Li, N., Xiao, Y., Palanki, R., Yamagata, H. M., Mitchell, M. J., & Han, X. (2025) · Small Methods · doi:10.1002/smtd.202401632 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationPalanki, R., Riley, J. S., Bose, S. K., Luks, V. L., Dave, A., Kus, N. J., White, B. M., Ricciardi, A. S., Swingle, K. L., Xue, L., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2400783121 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“GM - CSF (a regulator of macrophage production) was increased in both LNP treatment groups, as we observed previously following LNP administration (28).”
Self-citationThatte, A. S., Hamilton, A. G., Nachod, B. E., Mukalel, A. J., Billingsley, M. M., Palanki, R., Swingle, K. L., & Mitchell, M. J. (2023) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c02573 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citationLipid nanoparticle (LNP) mediated mRNA delivery in neurodegenerative diseases
Moosavi, S. G., Rahiman, N., Jaafari, M. R., & Arabi, L. (2025) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.113641 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Chen, Z., Kelly, K., Cheng, H., Dong, X., Hedger, A. K., Li, L., Sontheimer, E. J., & Watts, J. K. (2023) · GEN Biotechnology · doi:10.1089/genbio.2023.0045 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“The toxicity associated with the daily repeat dosing regimen or innate immune stimulation due to the frequent re-administration of LNPs 74–78 might have prevented cells from translating mRNA 79 and thus getting any benefit from subsequent doses under this regimen.”
Self-citationHigh-throughput platforms for machine learning-guided lipid nanoparticle design
Hanna, A. R., Issadore, D., & Mitchell, M. J. (2025) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-025-00831-0 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“In terms of the nucleic acid cargo, there exist a massive number of potential functional variants of each small interfering RNA 40 , mRNA 25 , circular RNA 41 , self-amplifying mRNA 42 and gene-editing cargo 43,44 .”
Self-citationEmerging strategies for nanomedicine in autoimmunity
Thatte, A. S., Billingsley, M. M., Weissman, D., Melamed, J. R., & Mitchell, M. J. (2024) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2024.115194 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationAbostait, A., Abdelkarim, M., Bao, Z., Miyake, Y., Tse, W. H., Ciano‐Oliveira, C. D., Buerki‐Thurnherr, T., Allen, C. J., Keijzer, R., & Labouta, H. I. (2024) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.10.047 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Breaking genetic shackles: The advance of base editing in genetic disorder treatment
Xu, F., Zheng, C., Xu, W., Zhang, S., Liu, S., Chen, X., & Yao, K. (2024) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2024.1364135 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“One such approach involves localized LNP injections, where Palanki and colleagues have successfully identi fi ed the most effective LNPs in the perinatal mouse brain by administering intracerebroventricular (ICV) injections in fetal and neonatal mice (Palanki et al., 2023).”
BackgroundZhang, M., Xiang, C., Niu, R., He, X., Luo, W., Liu, W., & Gu, R. (2024) · Neural Regeneration Research · doi:10.4103/nrr.nrr-d-24-00048 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Gao, K., Han, H., Cranick, M. G., Zhao, S., Xu, S., Yin, B., Song, H., Hu, Y., Clarke, M. T., Wang, D., et al. (2024) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c05169 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Insights into the formulation of lipid nanoparticles for the optimization of mRNA therapeutics
Jiao, X., He, X., Qin, S., Yin, X., Song, T., Duan, X., Shi, H., Jiang, S., Zhang, Y., & Song, X. (2024) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1002/wnan.1992 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
CRISPR-dependent base editing as a therapeutic strategy for rare monogenic disorders
Cabré-Romans, J.-J., & Cuella-Martin, R. (2025) · Frontiers in Genome Editing · doi:10.3389/fgeed.2025.1553590 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Jajko, G., Anagha, M. O., Chytrosz-Wróbel, P., et al. (2025) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2025.107559 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“Bioactive nanoparticles play a critical role in modern medicine by offering unprecedented opportunities for targeted drug delivery [5], diagnostic imaging [6], and therapeutic interventions [7,8].”
Palanki, R., Han, E. L., Murray, A. M., Maganti, R., Tang, S. N., Swingle, K. L., Kim, D., Yamagata, H. M., Safford, H. C., Mrksich, K., et al. (2024) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/d4lc00283k · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationDistinct Inflammatory Programs Underlie the Intramuscular Lipid Nanoparticle Response
Dowell, W. R., Dearborn, J. S., Languon, S., Miller, Z. D., Kirch, T., Paige, S., Garvin, O., Kjendal, L., Harby, E., Zuchowski, A. B., et al. (2024) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c08490 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Strategies for enhanced gene delivery to the central nervous system
Gao, Z. (2024) · Nanoscale Advances · doi:10.1039/d3na01125a · Cited by 24 · see citing works
An Antibody‐CRISPR/Cas Conjugate Platform for Target‐Specific Delivery and Gene Editing in Cancer
Yang, S., Im, S. H., Chung, J. Y., Lee, J. H., Lee, K., Kang, Y. K., & Chung, H. J. (2024) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202308763 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Nucleic acid delivery by lipid nanoparticles for organ targeting
Guo, J., Gu, M., Chen, Y., Xiong, T., Zhang, Y., Chen, S., Li, M., Chen, X., & Peng, X. (2025) · Chinese Chemical Letters · doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2025.110849 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Quaternization drives spleen-to-lung tropism conversion for mRNA-loaded lipid-like nanoassemblies
Huang, Y., Wu, J., Li, S., Liu, Z., Li, Z., Zhou, B., & Li, B. (2024) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.90071 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
RNA–lipid nanoparticles for acute critical illnesses
Omo‐Lamai, S., Zamora, M. E., Mueller, B. K., Casciano, J. C., & Brenner, J. S. (2025) · Nature Reviews Bioengineering · doi:10.1038/s44222-025-00314-5 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“This strategy has improved LNP delivery to the brain in vivo in foetal mice and non-human primate models 134 .”
Recent Advances in mRNA-LNP Delivery Systems for Extrahepatic Organs: A Review
Bai, Y., Cui, L., Liu, T., Wang, Z., Cao, H., He, S., Qiu, J., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., Shi, J., et al. (2025) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.5c00385 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Liu, S., Li, H., Xi, S., Zhang, Y., & Sun, T. (2025) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s457393 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“201 For tumor treatment, CRISPR-Cas9 can also be employed by targeting oncogenic viruses and promoting the expression of tumor suppressor genes.”
Lipid nanoparticles: A delicate nucleic acid delivery system to be further explored
Ma, R., Li, Y., Su, Y., Chen, P., Xie, S., Tan, W., & Liu, X. (2024) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2024.102586 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Leveraging high-throughput screening technologies in targeted mRNA delivery
Zhang, Y., Gao, Z., Yang, X. Q., Xu, Q., & Lu, Y. (2024) · Materials Today Bio · doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101101 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“By screening an ionizable LNP library through intraventricular injections in the fetal and neonatal mouse brain, the optimal C3 LNP formulation has been identified, demonstrating greater mRNA delivery functionality in the peri-natal brain compared to traditional LNPs [115].”
BackgroundAdvances in the development of lipid nanoparticles for ophthalmic therapeutics
Chen, S., Deng, Z., & Ji, D. (2024) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2024.117108 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Pharmaceutical strategies for optimized mRNA expression
Shi, Y., Mao, J., Wang, S., Ma, S., Luo, L., & You, J. (2024) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2024.122853 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Lynn, A. Y., Shin, K., Eaton, D. A., Rose, M., Zhang, X., Ene, M., Grundler, J., Deschenes, E., Rivero, R., Bracaglia, L. G., et al. (2025) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123238 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Novel Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) Delivery Systems Enabling the Advancement of RNA Therapeutics
Zhang, H., Han, S., Zhang, X., Ma, J., Jin, L., Wang, Y., Ma, Y., Ma, T., Yu, F., & Song, G. (2026) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.202505340 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“This approach bypasses the blood-brain barrier (BBB), enabling direct treatment of cerebral targets such as periventricular cells with reduced off-target effects [115].”
In Utero Gene Therapy and its Application in Genetic Hearing Loss
Kong, C., Yin, G., Wang, X., & Sun, Y. (2024) · Advanced Biology · doi:10.1002/adbi.202400193 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Noble Nanomedicine: Celebrating Groundbreaking mRNA Vaccine Innovations
Chan, W. C. W., Artzi, N., Chen, C., Chen, X., Ho, D., Hu, Y., Kataoka, K., Liz‐Marzán, L. M., Öklü, R., & Parak, W. J. (2023) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c09781 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Programmable lipid nanoparticles for RNA therapeutics: Design principles and clinical translation
Talemi, M. N., Farani, M. R., Eskandani, N. A., Mirzaee, D., Alipourfard, I., & Huh, Y. S. (2026) · Materials Today Bio · doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2026.102774 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“For example, ionizable LNP libraries screened for perinatal brain tropism achieved efficient adenine-base-editor mRNA delivery and biochemical rescue in neonatal disease models, demonstrating feasibility of correcting CNS mutations via minimally immunogenic, non-viral LNP platforms [133].”
Bioconjugates for improved delivery of oligonucleotide therapeutics to the central nervous system
Lee, H. J., Xie, Y., Greineder, C. F., & Tessier, P. M. (2026) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2026.115778 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Lin, X., Wei, L., Li, X., Zeng, L., Tang, Y., Wang, H., Lu, H., Li, C., Wang, H., Chen, J., et al. (2025) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202500362 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Advancing Gene Therapy for Phenylketonuria: From Precision Editing to Clinical Translation
Yu, I., & Jeong, J. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26178722 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“However, no long-term data are reported in humans [46,70–72].”
Biodegradable lipid nanoparticles for genome editing in the brain via intrathecal administration
Dong, S., Healy, L., Gong, F., Xu, Y., Cai, Y., Solek, N. C., Chen, J., Zhou, M., Thomson, T., Savguira, M., et al. (2025) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2025.11.032 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Han, Y., Wang, Y., Gao, X., Lei, Y., Li, Y., & Tang, Z. (2026) · Cancer Nexus · doi:10.1002/cnx2.70021 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
RNA-Based Therapeutic Technology
Mashima, R., Takada, S., & Miyamoto, Y. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms242015230 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Han, E. L., Kim, D., Murray, A. M., Mrksich, K., Hamilton, A. G., Tang, S., Yoo, S., Zhu, A. T., Tong, E. R., Palanki, R., et al. (2026) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c19138 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationZhang, F., Burghardt, T., Höhn, M., & Wagner, E. (2024) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics16060779 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
LNP-mRNA delivers TNF-α antibody to deep cartilage and protects against osteoarthritis
Li, B., Cui, L., Kong, K., Pang, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, S., Wang, F., Zhou, T., Hua, Y., Mi, C., et al. (2024) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.156723 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Carpenter, M. D., Kus, N. J., Choi, R. B., Said, H., Dumitru, A. M., Bauer, J. H., Wang, S., Luks, V. L., Teerdhala, S., Shah, A., et al. (2025) · Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical Development · doi:10.1016/j.omtm.2025.101599 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“26,73,74 For fetal administration, pregnant female Smn1 (cid:0) / (cid:0) SMN2 Tg/Tg mice carrying severe SMA pups underwent surgery, and fetuses were injected on gestational day (E) 14.”
Self-citationWang, T., Li, W., Chen, J., Cheng, S., Gao, M., Jiang, C., Jiang, C., Hu, B., Sung, T., & Higuchi, A. (2026) · Materials Today Bio · doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2026.103044 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Opportunities and Challenges of Fetal Gene Therapy
Jeanne, M., & Chung, W. K. (2025) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.6809 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
The RNA delivery dilemma—lipid versus polymer nanoparticle platforms
Martins, C., Mitchell, M. J., Peer, D., Perrie, Y., Siegwart, D. J., Alonso, M. J., & Aparicio-Blanco, J. (2026) · Drug Delivery and Translational Research · doi:10.1007/s13346-026-02044-6 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“Mitchell ech-oed this enthusiasm for local central nervous system delivery, describing the preclinical work of his team using LNPs injected into cerebral ventricles with capacity to provide mRNA transfection in neuron populations [156].”
Self-citationIn vivo gene therapy: A strategy for mutations, degenerations, and tumors
Wang, T., Yu, M., Liu, P., Song, Z., Li, C., Yang, J., & Liu, N. (2025) · Genes & Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.gendis.2025.101808 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“176 Sela et al developed SynO4 LNPs for Parkinson’s disease (PD), tagged with transferrin to target the transferrin receptors on the blood — brain barrier after PD overexpression.”
Advances in RNA delivery to extrahepatic tissues and cells
Li, Z., Guo, S., & Huang, Y. (2026) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2026.115170 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Delivery strategies of messenger RNA therapeutics for brain disorders
Youn, K., Oh, S., Gil, H.-W., Choi, Y., Keum, G., & Bang, E. (2025) · Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society · doi:10.1002/bkcs.70083 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
sgRNA amount is a limiting factor in adenine base editing using RNA LNPs
Birkenshaw, A., Thomson, T., Truong, M. P., Komaki, Y., Ramsden, N., Timpano, A., Huang, C., Blakney, A. K., Kurek, D. Z., Kulkarni, J. A., et al. (2026) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2026.102909 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The use of nanocarriers in treating Batten disease: A systematic review
Henke, L., Ghorbani, A., & Mole, S. (2024) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.125094 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“…promising carriers for delivering mRNA to treat various rare genetic disease models, such as acute intermittent porphyria (AIP), Methylmalonic Acidemia (MMA), Haemophilia B, cystinosis, and recently for Fabry disease (DeRosa et al., 2019; Martini and Guey, 2019) and MPS-IH (Palanki et al., 2023).”
InfluentialOligodendrocyte: Development, Plasticity, Biological Functions, Diseases, and Therapeutic Targets
Xiang, Q., Shi, R., Huang, Y., Liu, L., Tao, J., Li, X.-H., & Li, X. (2026) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.70618 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Mean-while, the ionizable lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) combined with mRNA delivery into the perinatal brain may supply a translatable platform in clinic for mRNA therapy as well as gene editing [ 14 ].”
Winkeljann, B., Lapuhs, P., Alonso, M. J., & Kımna, C. (2026) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2026.114911 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Technologies for In Utero Stem Cell Targeting
Borges, B., Lum, T., & MacKenzie, T. C. (2025) · Current Stem Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s40778-025-00243-4 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Freire, J., Pang, S., McGee, J. E., Heinrich, M. J., Xie, J., Hammarlund, E., Shaw, D. C., Zhou, Y., Wang, Y., Porter, C., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.10.30.685635 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“The LNPs were then concentrated with a 3 kDa MWCO Amicon Ultra Centrifugal filter to approximately 200 ng/µL and further diluted to 125ng/µL with sterile PBS. LNPs were either stored at 4˚C and administered within 3 days of preparation or stored at -20˚C until use.”
Genome Editing Should Preferably Be Carried Out on Fetuses In Utero Rather Than IVF Embryos
Chin, A. H. B., Sun, N., & Yang, J. (2025) · Journal of Bioethical Inquiry · doi:10.1007/s11673-024-10415-2
“The study of Palanki et al. (2023), which demonstrated the ability of genome editing technology to cure or alleviate congenital brain disease during the second and third tri-mesters of pregnancy and in irreversible pathological processes is very promising.”
Editing the skin in place: In vivo genome correction of rare skin disease
Palanki, R., Fitzgerald, E., Poirier, A. J., et al. (2026) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2026.01.003
Self-citationEngineering considerations for paediatric drug delivery
Palanki, R., Peranteau, W. H., & Mitchell, M. J. (2026) · Nature Reviews Bioengineering · doi:10.1038/s44222-026-00418-6
“For example, postnatal bone marrow transplant is a therapy for X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency; however, transplant survival is only 60–80% if the donor is a parent whose human leukocyte antigens (HLA) match half of those of the child 32 .”
Self-citationZhang, X., Liao, Y., Hong, X., Xiao, Y., & Zeng, X. (2026) · Science China Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s11426-025-3182-6
Advancements in Neonatal Brain Injury Treatment: Nanomedicine-Based Strategies
Jin, P., He, C., Zhang, X., & Huang, Y. (2026) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s597726
“27 Beyond the development of strategies for delivering therapeutic agents, fundamental formulation science and systematic safety assessment are also critical.”
InfluentialAdvanced lipid nanoparticles for targeted nucleic acid delivery
Deng, Y., Chen, M., Zhou, X., Luo, T., Guo, J., Giles, A., Mourin, T. T., & Chen, G. (2026) · Nano Research · doi:10.26599/nr.2026.94908809
Optimizing C14120-based lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery: Editorial commentary
Fung, V., Argenti, C., Magaw, M., & Fenton, O. S. (2026) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2026.102945
Arral, M. L., Chaudhary, N., Fein, K. C., Newby, A. N., Yerneni, S. S., Melamed, J. R., LoPresti, S. T., Petersen, D. M. S., & Whitehead, K. A. (2026) · Drug Delivery and Translational Research · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9763025/v1
“Beyond vaccination[4, 5], LNPs hold promise for diverse therapeutic applications, including protein replacement [6–8], gene therapy[9, 10], and immunotherapy [11–13].”
Zeng, Y., Song, T., Liu, S., Liao, X., Hu, M., Yang, H., He, S., & Song, X. (2026) · Chinese Medical Journal BioMed · doi:10.65457/cmjbm-2026-0005
Human T cell engineering via serial delivery of mRNA encapsulated within lipid nanoparticles
Ramamurthy, A., Scimonelli, G., Murphy, W. L., & Saha, K. (2026) · Molecular Therapy — Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2026.103081
Nucleic acid drug therapies for CNS diseases: Present status and future perspectives
Chen, Y., Kuriakose, D., & Xiao, Z. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-44631-3.00006-8
Yadav, A., Pal, S., Mayur, A., Dutta, J., Verma, S. K., & Gartia, M. R. (2026) · ACS Nano Medicine · doi:10.1021/acsnanomed.6c00039
Revealing Nanomedicine Design Principles for Efficient siRNA Delivery to the Central Nervous System
Tan, Z., Kaur, S., Das, R., Nozohouri, S., Johnson, H., Liu, X., Chueh, H.-C., Al-Sowaimel, L., Li, Z., Moront, C., et al. (2026) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.5c02711
Sparkes, K., Winter, M. A., Dekker, G., Chamley, L. W., Larsen, M. J., & Thierry, B. (2026) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aef5425
“…sustained expression. mRNA–lipid nanoparticle platforms (consisting of mRNA encoding the editor enzyme, the lipid nanoparticle, and customized guide RNA) have achieved targeted editing of fetal haematopoietic stem cells ( 147 ), the brain ( 148 , 149 ), and multiple organs ( 150 ) in murine models.”
A systemic-absorption-blocked (SEAL) nanoplatform for mRNA-based local immunotherapy
Qiu, Y., Li, R., Duan, X., Li, Z., Cai, Y., Zhou, Q., Zhou, T., Liu, X., & Xuefei, Z. (2026) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2026.115430
- Authors
- Palanki, R., Bose, S. K., Dave, A., White, B. M., Berkowitz, C., Luks, V., Yaqoob, F., Han, E., Swingle, K. L., Menon, P., Hodgson, E., Biswas, A., Billingsley, M. M., Li, L., Yiping, F., Carpenter, M., Trokhan, A., Yeo, J., Johana, N., Wan, T. Y., Alameh, M.-G., Bennett, F. C., Storm, P. B., Jain, R., Chan, J., Weissman, D., Mitchell, M. J., & Peranteau, W. H.
- Affiliations
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Duke-NUS Medical School (SG)
- Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, 169547, Singapore
- KK Women's and Children's Hospital (SG)
- Abramson Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mitchell, Michael J.
- Peranteau, William H.
- ORCID
- Palanki, Rohan
- Bose, Sourav K.
- White, Brandon M.
- Berkowitz, Cara
- Luks, Valerie
- Yaqoob, Fazeela
- Han, Emily
- Swingle, Kelsey L.
- Menon, Pallavi
- Hodgson, Emily
- Biswas, Arijit
- Billingsley, Margaret M.
- Li, Li
- Carpenter, Marco
- Yeo, Julie
- Alameh, Mohamad-Gabriel
- Bennett, Frederick Chris
- Storm, Phillip B.
- Jain, Rajan
- Chan, Jerry
- Weissman, Drew
- Mitchell, Michael J.
- Peranteau, William H.
- Venue
- ACS Nano
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2023-07-17
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 13594-13610
- ISSN
- 1936-0851 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-086X
- PMC
- PMC11025390
- OpenAlex
- W4384523189
- Semantic Scholar
- 986a26490384b0939fcc7035d8469968eb972a9e
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- ACS Nano (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH Office of the Director (DP2HL152427, DP2TR002776, T32GM07170)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK123049)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (F30HL162465-01A1)
- Burroughs Wellcome Fund
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
- Keywords
- ionizable lipid nanoparticles, mRNA delivery, base editing, lysosomal storage disease, intracerebroventricular administration, fetal brain, neonatal brain, non-viral gene delivery, adenine base editing, in utero gene therapy, nonhuman primate model
- MeSH terms
- Gene Editing, Animals, Brain Diseases, Humans, Lipids, Liposomes, RNA, Messenger, RNA, Small Interfering, Mice, Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-20.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-20.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review