The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Existence and Stability of Bulk Nanobubbles
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Bulk nanobubbles are a novel type of nanoscale bubble system. Because of their extraordinary behavior, however, their existence is not widely accepted. In this paper, we shed light on the hypothesis that bulk nanobubbles do exist, they are filled with gas, and they survive for long periods of time, challenging present theories. An acoustic cavitation technique has been used to produce bulk nanobubbles in pure water in relatively large numbers approaching 109 bubble·mL–1 with a typical diameter of 100–120 nm. We provide multiple evidence that the nanoentities observed in suspension are nanobubbles given that they disappear after freezing and thawing of the suspensions, their nucleation rate depends strongly on the amount of air dissolved in water, and they gradually disappear over time. The bulk nanobubble suspensions were stable over periods of many months during which time the mean diameter remained unchanged, suggesting the absence of significant bubble coalescence, bubble breakage, or Ostwald ripening effects. Measurements suggest that these nanobubbles are negatively charged and their zeta potential does not vary over time. The presence of such a constant charge on the nanobubble surfaces is probably responsible for their stability. The effects of pH, salt, and surfactant addition on their colloidal stability are similar to those reported in the literature for solid nanoparticle suspensions, that is, nanobubbles are more stable in an alkaline medium than in an acidic one; the addition of salt to a nanobubble suspension drives the negative zeta potential toward zero, thus reducing the repulsive electrostatic forces between nanobubbles; and the addition of an anionic surfactant increases the magnitude of the negative zeta potential, thus improving nanobubble electrostatic stabilization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Filipe, V., Hawe, A., & Jiskoot, W. (2010) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-010-0073-2 · Cited by 1,885
Cited by
Controlled oxygen delivery to power tissue regeneration
Zoneff, E., Wang, Y., Jackson, C., Smith, O., Duchi, S., Onofrillo, C., Farrugia, B., Moulton, S. E., Williams, R., Parish, C., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-48719-x · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Nirmalkar, N., Pacek, A. W., & Barigou, M.
- Venue
- Langmuir
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2018-09-04
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 10964-10973
- ISSN
- 0743-7463 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5827
- OpenAlex
- W2890988943
- Cited by
- 516
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Existence and Stability of Bulk Nanobubbles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01163
- The paper
- Nirmalkar, N., Pacek, A. W., & Barigou, M. (2018). On the Existence and Stability of Bulk Nanobubbles. Langmuir. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01163
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.