Cited by 8Block Copolymer Self-AssemblyMachine Learning in Materials ScienceAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neural Network-Driven Exploration in Polymerization-Induced Self-Assembly: From 2D to 3D Pseudo-Phase Diagram

Open access
Fonseca Parra, Erika Paola, Oumerri, Jihad, Arteni, Ana Andrea, Six, Jean-Luc, Armes, Steven Peter, Ferji, Khalid·2025·Macromolecules

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We explore the application of artificial intelligence (AI) to predict the morphology of poly(glycerol monomethacrylate)-poly(2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate) (PGMA-PHPMA) diblock copolymer nano-objects prepared via polymerization-induced self-assembly (PISA) in aqueous media. Traditional studies typically map copolymer morphology using two-dimensional (2D) pseudo-phase diagrams, plotting variables such as the mean degree of polymerization (Xn) of the solvophobic block against the copolymer concentration (also known as the solids content). In contrast, our approach utilizes deep neural networks (DNNs) trained on literature data to generate detailed three-dimensional (3D) morphology maps. These maps include the molecular weight of the solvophilic block, providing a comprehensive volumetric view that reveals more complex relationships and transitional morphologies. This advanced modeling not only deepens our understanding of how PGMA molecular weight influences copolymer morphology but also significantly reduces the need for extensive experimental trials. Consequently, it simplifies the creation of accurate pseudo-phase diagrams across a broad range of aqueous PISA formulations. Experimental validation confirms the accuracy of our models, demonstrating the potential of AI to make predictive modeling more accessible to chemists and paving the way for future research on other PISA formulations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.macromol.4c01772

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1039/D0PY00455C · DOI
  2. 10.1039/C8PY01295D · DOI
  3. 10.1039/C8PY00346G · DOI
  4. 10.1039/D0PY00889C · DOI
  5. 10.1039/C9SC04197D · DOI
  6. 10.1039/D0PY01097A · DOI
  7. 10.1039/D0SC03411H · DOI
  8. 10.1039/C4SM01724B · DOI
  9. 10.1039/C6PY02135B · DOI
  10. 10.1039/C8PY01053F · DOI
  11. 10.1039/D2PY00040G · DOI
  12. 10.1039/D2PY01531E · DOI
  13. 10.1039/D3PY00246B · DOI
  14. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00755 · DOI
  15. 10.1021/jacs.1c08181 · DOI
  16. Montgomery D. C., 2021, Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis
  17. 10.1023/A:1010933404324 · DOI · Paper page
  18. McKinney, W. In Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python , Proc. of the 9th Python in Science Conf; SciPy, 2010; pp 51–56. · DOI
  19. Pedregosa F., 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12, 2825
  20. Zheng A., 2018, Feature Engineering for Machine Learning: Principles and Techniques for Data Scientists
  21. Abadi, M.; Barham, P.; Chen, J.; Chen, Z.; Davis, A.; Dean, J.; Devin, M.; Ghemawat, S.; Irving, G.; Isard, M. In TensorFlow: A System for Large-Scale Machine Learning ; 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 16), 2016; pp 265–283.
  22. Nair, V.; Hinton, G. E. In Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines , Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-10); ICML, 2010; pp 807–814.
  23. Bishop C. M., 2006, Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, 4
  24. 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1039/D1SC05022B · DOI
  26. 10.1021/ja410593n · DOI
  27. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c02096 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fonseca Parra, E. P., Oumerri, J., Arteni, A. A., Six, J.-L., Armes, S. P., & Ferji, K.
Affiliations
  • Université de Lorraine, CNRS, LCPM, 54000 Nancy, France
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, I2BC, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Ferji, Khalid
Venue
Macromolecules
Published
2024-12-31
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
61-73
ISSN
  • 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5835
OpenAlex
W4405920547
Cited by
8
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Macromolecules (publishedVersion)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-INSB-05-05)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Keywords
polymerization-induced self-assembly, deep neural network, molecular weight effects, morphology prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review