The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PRISM-Based Theory of Complex Coacervation: Excluded Volume versus Chain Correlation
Abstract
Aqueous solutions of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes can undergo liquid–liquid phase separation into materials known as complex coacervates. These coacervates have been a subject of intense experimental and theoretical interest. Efforts to provide a physical description of complex coacervates have led to a number of theories that qualitatively (and sometimes quantitatively) agree with experimental data. However, this agreement often occurs in a degeneracy of models with profoundly different starting assumptions and different levels of sophistication. Theoretical difficulties in these systems are similar to those in most polyelectrolyte systems where charged species are highly correlated. These highly correlated systems can be described using liquid state (LS) integral equation theories, which surpass mean-field theories by providing information on local charge ordering. We extend these ideas to complex coacervate systems using PRISM-type theories and are able to capture effects not observable in traditional coacervate models, particularly connectivity and excluded volume effects. We can thus bridge two traditional but incommensurate theories meant to describe complex coacervates: the Voorn–Overbeek theory and counterion release. Importantly, we hypothesize that a cancellation of connectivity and excluded volume effects provides an explanation for the ability of Voorn–Overbeek theory to fit experimental data despite its well-known approximations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bioinspired underwater adhesives by using the supramolecular toolbox
Hofman, A. H., van Hees, I. A., Yang, J., & Kamperman, M. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201704640 · Cited by 652
Recent advances in wet adhesives: Adhesion mechanism, design principle and applications
Cui, C., & Liu, W. (2021) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101388 · Cited by 557
Phase Transitions of Associative Biomacromolecules
Pappu, R. V., Cohen, S. R., Dar, F., Farag, M., & Kar, M. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00814 · Cited by 367
Phase Behavior and Salt Partitioning in Polyelectrolyte Complex Coacervates
Li, L., Srivastava, S., Andreev, M., Marciel, A. B., de Pablo, J. J., & Tirrell, M. V. (2018) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.8b00238 · Cited by 357
Complex coacervate‐based materials for biomedicine
Blocher, W. C., & Perry, S. L. (2017) · WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1002/wnan.1442 · Cited by 312
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Perry, S. L., & Sing, C. E.
- Venue
- Macromolecules
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-07-09
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 5040-5053
- ISSN
- 0024-9297 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5835
- OpenAlex
- W2302551836
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PRISM-Based Theory of Complex Coacervation: Excluded Volume versus Chain Correlation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acs.macromol.5b01027
- The paper
- Perry, S. L., & Sing, C. E. (2015). PRISM-Based Theory of Complex Coacervation: Excluded Volume versus Chain Correlation. Macromolecules. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.5b01027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.