The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bipolar Membrane Electrode Assemblies for Water Electrolysis
Open accessAbstract
Abstract We present the first analysis of a zero-gap bipolar membrane water electrolyzer fed with liquid water. Our electrolyzers feature a high-pH environment for the oxygen evolution reaction and a low-pH environment for the hydrogen evolution reaction. The advantages of proton exchange membrane water electrolysis can be combined with those of anion exchange membrane water electrolysis by including a water splitting bipolar interface. First, we develop a KOH-free anion exchange membrane electrolysis cell. The cell’s alkaline anode serves as an integral building block on the path to a bipolar system. In a second step, we use this building block to investigate the cell operation characteristics of various cell configurations. We study the cell performance as the bipolar interface is shifted progressively toward the anode. A bipolar membrane with and without a water splitting catalyst resulted in cell current densities of 450 and 5 mA cm–2 at cell voltages of 2.2 V, respectively. Upon moving the bipolar interface directly between the acidic membrane and the high-pH anode, we achieved current densities of 9000 mA cm–2 at cell voltages of 2.2 V. Our study demonstrates the potential of this water electrolysis configuration, which should be adopted for further scientific studies and may show promise for future commercial water electrolysis systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New Insights into Perfluorinated Sulfonic-Acid Ionomers
Kusoglu, A., & Weber, A. Z. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00159 · Cited by 2,432
Anion-exchange membranes in electrochemical energy systems
Varcoe, J. R., Atanassov, P., Dekel, D. R., Herring, A. M., Hickner, M. A., Kohl, P. A., Kucernak, A. R., Mustain, W. E., Nijmeijer, K., Scott, K., et al. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c4ee01303d · Cited by 2,051
The potential of proton exchange membrane–based electrolysis technology
Ayers, K. (2019) · Current Opinion in Electrochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.coelec.2019.08.008 · Cited by 162
McDonald, M. B., Ardo, S., Lewis, N. S., & Freund, M. S. (2014) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201402288 · Cited by 128
Transparent Bipolar Membrane for Water Splitting Applications
Chabi, S., Wright, A. G., Holdcroft, S., & Freund, M. S. (2017) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.7b04402 · Cited by 49
Cited by
Zhang, L., Jia, C., Bai, F., Wang, W., An, S., Zhao, K., Li, Z., Li, J., & Sun, H. (2024) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129455 · Cited by 659
Hydrogen energy systems: Technologies, trends, and future prospects
Sadeq, A. M., Homod, R. Z., Hussein, A. K., Togun, H., Mahmoodi, A., Isleem, H. F., Patil, A. R., & Moghaddam, A. H. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173622 · Cited by 528
Emerging materials and technologies for electrocatalytic seawater splitting
Jin, H., Xu, J., Liu, H., Shen, H., Yu, H., Jaroniec, M., Zheng, Y., & Qiao, S.-Z. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adi7755 · Cited by 417
Low-temperature water electrolysis: fundamentals, progress, and new strategies
Li, W., Tian, H., Ma, L., Wang, Y., Liu, X., & Gao, X. (2022) · Materials Advances · doi:10.1039/d2ma00185c · Cited by 312
Insights and Challenges for Applying Bipolar Membranes in Advanced Electrochemical Energy Systems
Blommaert, M. A., Aili, D., Tufa, R. A., Li, Q., Smith, W. A., & Vermaas, D. A. (2021) · ACS Energy Letters · doi:10.1021/acsenergylett.1c00618 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayerhöfer, B., McLaughlin, D., Böhm, T., Hegelheimer, M., Seeberger, D., & Thiele, S.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Energy Materials
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2020-07-30
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 9635-9644
- ISSN
- 2574-0962 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3046632533
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.