On the Structure and Lithium Adsorption Mechanism of Layered H 2 TiO 3
Abstract
Layered H 2 TiO 3 has been studied as an ionic sieve material for the selective concentration of lithium from solutions. The accepted mechanism of lithium adsorption on H 2 TiO 3 ion sieves is that it occurs via Li + –H + ion exchange with no chemical bond breakage. However, in this work, we demonstrate that lithium adsorption on H 2 TiO 3 occurs via O–H bond breakage and the formation of O–Li bonds, contrary to previously proposed mechanisms. Thermogravimetric analysis results show that the weight loss due to dehydroxylation decreases from 2.96 wt % to 0.8 wt % after lithium adsorption, indicating that surface hydroxyl groups break during lithium adsorption. Raman and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy studies indicate that H 2 TiO 3 contains isolated OH groups and hydrogen-bonded OH groups. Among these two hydroxyl groups, isolated OH groups present in the HTi 2 layers are more actively involved in lithium adsorption than hydrogen-bonded OH groups. As a result, the actual adsorption capacity is limited by the number of isolated OH groups, whereas hydrogen-bonded OH groups involved are for stabilizing the layered structure. We also show that H 2 TiO 3 contains a high concentration of stacking faults and structural disorders which play a crucial role in controlling lithium adsorption properties.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LTO-type LISs demonstrate higher theoretical adsorption capacity and better recyclability for continuous extraction than LMO-type LISs.
“Consequently, LTO-type LISs demonstrate higher theoretical adsorption capacity and better recyclability for continuous extraction (Marthi et al., 2021).”
From A review of technologies for direct lithium extraction from low Li+ concentration aqueous solutions (2022) · cites this paper as Marthi et al., 2021
Unlike Mn, the Ti valence ions remain stable during permeation and adsorption.
“Unlike Mn, the Ti valence ions remain stable during permeation and adsorption.”
From A review of technologies for direct lithium extraction from low Li+ concentration aqueous solutions (2022) · cites this paper as Marthi et al., 2021
Cites
Lithium recovery from salt lake brine by H <sub>2</sub> TiO <sub>3</sub>
Chitrakar, R., Makita, Y., Ooi, K., & Sonoda, A. (2014) · Dalton Trans. · doi:10.1039/c4dt00467a · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lithium recovery from brine: Recent developments and challenges
Khalil, A., Mohammed, S., Hashaikeh, R., & Hilal, N. (2022) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2022.115611 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Lithium extraction from salt lake brines with high magnesium/lithium ratio: a review
Zhu, R., Wang, S., Srinivasakannan, C., Li, S., Yin, S., Zhang, L., Jiang, X., Zhou, G., & Zhang, N. (2023) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-023-01571-9 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Direct lithium extraction: A new paradigm for lithium production and resource utilization
Farahbakhsh, J., Arshadi, F., Mofidi, Z., Mohseni-Dargah, M., Kök, C., Assefi, M., Soozanipour, A., Zargar, M., Asadnia, M., Boroumand, Y., et al. (2024) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2023.117249 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
A review of technologies for direct lithium extraction from low Li+ concentration aqueous solutions
Murphy, O., & Haji, M. N. (2022) · Frontiers in Chemical Engineering · doi:10.3389/fceng.2022.1008680 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Nikkhah, H., Ipekçi, D., Xiang, W., Stoll, Z., Xu, P., Li, B., McCutcheon, J. R., & Beykal, B. (2024) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.155349 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Reich, R., Slunitschek, K., Danisi, R. M., Eiche, E., & Kolb, J. (2023) · Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review · doi:10.1080/08827508.2022.2047041 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Luo, G., Li, X., Chen, L., Chao, Y., & Zhu, W. (2023) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2022.116228 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
- Authors
- Marthi, R., Asgar, H., Gadikota, G., & Smith, Y. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Utah (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, York R.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2021-02-11
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 8361-8369
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W3127221544
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 48 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 11.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-06CH11357)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Chemical Synthesis and Characterization
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Layered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
- Keywords
- lithium adsorption, lithium ion exchange, ion sieve, hydroxyl groups, dehydroxylation, hydrogen bonding, stacking faults, structural disorder
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review