Cited by 170Chemical Synthesis and CharacterizationLayered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and ApplicationsExtraction and Separation Processes

On the Structure and Lithium Adsorption Mechanism of Layered H 2 TiO 3

Marthi, Rajashekhar, Asgar, Hassnain, Gadikota, Greeshma, Smith, York R.·2021·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

Layered H 2 TiO 3 has been studied as an ionic sieve material for the selective concentration of lithium from solutions. The accepted mechanism of lithium adsorption on H 2 TiO 3 ion sieves is that it occurs via Li + –H + ion exchange with no chemical bond breakage. However, in this work, we demonstrate that lithium adsorption on H 2 TiO 3 occurs via O–H bond breakage and the formation of O–Li bonds, contrary to previously proposed mechanisms. Thermogravimetric analysis results show that the weight loss due to dehydroxylation decreases from 2.96 wt % to 0.8 wt % after lithium adsorption, indicating that surface hydroxyl groups break during lithium adsorption. Raman and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy studies indicate that H 2 TiO 3 contains isolated OH groups and hydrogen-bonded OH groups. Among these two hydroxyl groups, isolated OH groups present in the HTi 2 layers are more actively involved in lithium adsorption than hydrogen-bonded OH groups. As a result, the actual adsorption capacity is limited by the number of isolated OH groups, whereas hydrogen-bonded OH groups involved are for stabilizing the layered structure. We also show that H 2 TiO 3 contains a high concentration of stacking faults and structural disorders which play a crucial role in controlling lithium adsorption properties.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.0c20691

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marthi, R., Asgar, H., Gadikota, G., & Smith, Y. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, York R.
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2021-02-11
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
8361-8369
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W3127221544
Cited by
170
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 2
FWCI
11.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC02-06CH11357)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Chemical Synthesis and Characterization
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Layered Double Hydroxides Synthesis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
Keywords
lithium adsorption, lithium ion exchange, ion sieve, hydroxyl groups, dehydroxylation, hydrogen bonding, stacking faults, structural disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review