Cited by 10Membrane Separation and Gas TransportNanopore and Nanochannel Transport StudiesGraphene research and applications

Ab Initio Energetic Barriers of Gas Permeation across Nanoporous Graphene

Open access
Rodriguez, Alejandro, Schlichting, Karl-Philipp, Poulikakos, Dimos, Hu, Ming·2021·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Realizing membranes of atomic thickness functioning reliably constitutes a giant leap forward for a plethora of applications where the efficient separation of fluid constituents at the molecular level is critical. Here, by employing density functional theory, we explore the energy landscape of typical gas molecules attempting permeation through graphene nanopores and determine the minimum energy permeation pathways, based on the precise knowledge of the related molecular level interactions. With this approach we investigate two basic permeation routes: direct permeation and surface-based transport. We find that for subnanometer pores, the diffusion barrier of direct and surface transport depends on the pore chemical functionalization, while the molecule pore permeation barrier is independent of the gas–pore approach due to the overlap of surface and direct diffusion paths over the pore center. The overall minimum energy permeation pathway of He, H 2, CO 2, and CH 4 molecules, across nanopores of different dimensions and chemical functionalization, defines the pore diameter (∼1.2 nm) below which effusion theory is inaccurate, as well as the critical pore diameter (∼0.8 nm) required to achieve positive permeation barriers driving molecular sieving. We determine that achieving positive permeation barriers required for high selectivity gas separation is inseparably combined with postpermeation desorption barriers due to attractive van der Waals interactions. The discovered permeation energetics are pore-molecule-specific and are incorporated into an analytical model extending existing theory. Our results provide a scientific background for rational pore design in graphene membranes, which can lead to gas separation at a commercially relevant performance level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.1c09229

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Rodriguez, A., Schlichting, K.-P., Poulikakos, D., & Hu, M.
Affiliations
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Laboratory of Thermodynamics in Emerging Technologies, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zürich, Sonneggstrasse 3, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland
Corresponding author
Hu, Ming
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2021-08-14
Volume
13
Issue
33
Pages
39701-39710
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W3196236440
Cited by
10
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Nuclear Energy University Programs (DE-NE-0000095)
  • Eidgen??ssische Technische Hochschule Z??rich
  • South Carolina Space Grant Consortium (521179-RP-SC005)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Membrane Separation and Gas Transport
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
Keywords
graphene nanopores, gas permeation, permeability barrier, minimum energy path, surface diffusion, molecular sieving, gas separation, van der Waals interactions, pore size, helium, hydrogen, carbon dioxide, methane

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review