Cited by 43Quantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesAdvanced Semiconductor Detectors and MaterialsZnO doping and properties

High-Performance Colloidal Quantum Dot Photodiodes via Suppressing Interface Defects

Lu, Shuaicheng, Liu, Peilin, Yang, Junrui, Liu, Shijie, Yang, Yang, Chen, Long, Liu, Jing, Liu, Yuxuan +5 more·2023·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

PbS colloidal quantum dot (CQD) infrared photodiodes have attracted wide attention due to the prospect of developing cost-effective infrared imaging technology. Presently, ZnO films are widely used as the electron transport layer (ETL) of PbS CQDs infrared photodiodes. However, ZnO-based devices still suffer from the problems of large dark current and low repeatability, which are caused by the low crystallinity and sensitive surface of ZnO films. Here, we effectively optimized the device performance of PbS CQDs infrared photodiode via diminishing the influence of adsorbed H 2 O at the ZnO/PbS CQDs interface. The polar (002) ZnO crystal plane showed much higher adsorption energy of H 2 O molecules compared with other nonpolar planes, which could reduce the interface defects induced by detrimentally adsorbed H 2 O. Based on the sputtering method, we obtained the [002]-oriented and high-crystallinity ZnO ETL and effectively suppressed the adsorption of detrimental H 2 O molecules. The prepared PbS CQDs infrared photodiode with the sputtered ZnO ETL demonstrated lower dark current density, higher external quantum efficiency, and faster photoresponse compared with the sol–gel ZnO device. Simulation results further unveiled the relationship between interface defects and device dark current. Finally, a high-performance sputtered ZnO/PbS CQDs device was obtained with a specific detectivity of 2.15 × 10 12 Jones at −3 dB bandwidth (94.6 kHz).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.2c22774

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, S., Liu, P., Yang, J., Liu, S., Yang, Y., Chen, L., Liu, J., Liu, Y., Wang, B., Lan, X., Zhang, J., Gao, L., & Tang, J.
Affiliations
Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Bo
  • Gao, Liang
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2023-02-27
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
12061-12069
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W4322495059
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wenzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau (G20210013)
  • Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2021YFA0715502)
  • Science and Technology Department of Hubei Province (2021BAA014)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M691118, 2022M711237)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (2020CFA034)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61904065, 61974052, 62204091)
  • Optics Valley Laboratory (OVL2021BG009)
  • Hubei Province (2021EHB010)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › ZnO doping and properties
Keywords
PbS colloidal quantum dots, infrared photodiodes, ZnO electron transport layer, interface defects, water adsorption, dark current reduction, external quantum efficiency, photoresponse, detectivity, infrared imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review