The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Core–Shell Ferromagnetic Nanorod Based on Amine Polymer Composite (Fe3O4@DAPF) for Fast Removal of Pb(II) from Aqueous Solutions
Abstract
Heavy metal ion removal from wastewater constitutes an important issue in the water treatment industry. Although a variety of nanomaterials have been developed for heavy metal removal via adsorption, the adsorption capacity, removal efficiency, and material recyclability still remain a challenge. Here, we present novel Fe3O4@DAPF core-shell ferromagnetic nanorods (CSFMNRs) for the removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solutions; they were prepared by the facile surface modification of twin-like ferromagnetic Fe3O4 nanorods using a 2,3-diaminophenol and formaldehyde (DAPF)-based polymer. The crystallinity and structure of the Fe3O4 nanorods were confirmed via X-ray diffraction (XRD). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) revealed the core-shell morphology and composition of the materials. Pb(II) removal using the prepared Fe3O4@DAPF CSFMNRs was assessed, and comparable adsorption capacities (83.3 mg g(-1)) to the largest value were demonstrated. A thermodynamic study of the adsorption clearly indicated that the adsorption was exothermic and spontaneous. Due to the ferromagnetic properties with a high saturation magnetization value (56.1 emu g(-1)) of the nanorods, the nanorods exhibited excellent reusability with one of the fastest recovery times (25 s) among reported materials. Therefore, the Fe3O4@DAPF CSFMNRs can serve as recyclable adsorbent materials and as an alternative to commonly used sorbent materials for the rapid removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review
Fu, F., & Wang, Q. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011 · Cited by 8,703
Cited by
A Review on Metal- and Metal Oxide-Based Nanozymes: Properties, Mechanisms, and Applications
Liu, Q., Zhang, A., Wang, R., Zhang, Q., & Cui, D. (2021) · Nano-Micro Letters · doi:10.1007/s40820-021-00674-8 · Cited by 745
Polymer-based nanocomposites for heavy metal ions removal from aqueous solution: a review
Zhao, G., Huang, X., Tang, Z., Huang, Q., Niu, F., & Wang, X. (2018) · Polymer Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c8py00484f · Cited by 531
Removal of cadmium and lead ions from water by sulfonated magnetic nanoparticle adsorbents
Chen, K., He, J., Li, Y., Cai, X., Zhang, K., Liu, T., Hu, Y., Lin, D., Kong, L., & Liu, J. (2017) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2017.01.082 · Cited by 265
Yi, X., He, J., Guo, Y., Han, Z., Yang, M., Jin, J., Gu, J., Ou, M., & Xu, X. (2018) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.09.036 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Venkateswarlu, S., & Yoon, M.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-11-03
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 45
- Pages
- 25362-25372
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W1829259832
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.