The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stimulation of Wound Healing by Electroactive, Antibacterial, and Antioxidant Polyurethane/Siloxane Dressing Membranes: In Vitro and in Vivo Evaluations
Abstract
A series of novel polyurethane/siloxane-based wound dressing membranes was prepared through sol-gel reaction of methoxysilane end-functionalized urethane prepolymers composed of castor oil and ricinoleic methyl ester as well as methoxysilane functional aniline tetramer (AT) moieties. The samples were fully characterized and their physicochemical, mechanical, electrical, and biological properties were assayed. The biological activity of these dressings against fibroblast cells and couple of microbes was also studied. It was revealed that samples that displayed electroactivity by introduction of AT moieties showed a broad range of antimicrobial activity toward different microorganisms, promising antioxidant (radical scavenging) efficiency and significant activity for stimulation of fibroblast cell growth and proliferation. Meanwhile, these samples showed appropriate tensile strength and ability for maintaining a moist environment over a wound by controlled equilibrium water absorption and water vapor transmission rate. The selected electroactive dressing was subjected to an in vivo assay using a rat animal model and the wound healing process was monitored and compared with analogous dressing without AT moieties. The recorded results showed that the electroactive dressings induced an increase in the rate of wound contraction, promoted collagen deposition, and encouraged vascularization in the wounded area. On the basis of the results of in vitro and in vivo assays, the positive influence of designed dressings for accelerated healing of a wound model was confirmed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conducting polymers in biomedical engineering
Guimard, N. K., Gomez, N., & Schmidt, C. E. (2007) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.012 · Cited by 1,599
Jennings, M. C., Minbiole, K. P. C., & Wuest, W. M. (2015) · ACS Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1021/acsinfecdis.5b00047 · Cited by 651
Cited by
Liang, Y., Zhao, X., Hu, T., Chen, B., Yin, Z., Ma, P. X., & Guo, B. (2019) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201900046 · Cited by 1,281
Zhao, X., Guo, B., Wu, H., Liang, Y., & Ma, P. X. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04998-9 · Cited by 1,161
Conducting Polymers for Tissue Engineering
Guo, B., & Ma, P. X. (2018) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00276 · Cited by 835
Qu, J., Zhao, X., Liang, Y., Xu, Y., Ma, P. X., & Guo, B. (2019) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2019.01.028 · Cited by 707
Liang, Y., Zhao, X., Hu, T., Han, Y., & Guo, B. (2019) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2019.08.083 · Cited by 586
Metadata
- Authors
- Gharibi, R., Yeganeh, H., Rezapour-Lactoee, A., & Hassan, Z. M.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-10-23
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 43
- Pages
- 24296-24311
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2336318282
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.