Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 171

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antibacterial Property of Graphene Quantum Dots (Both Source Material and Bacterial Shape Matter)

Hui, Liwei, Huang, Jianliu, Chen, Guanxiong, Zhu, Yanwu, Yang, Lihua·2016·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

Whereas diverse graphene quantum dots (GQDs) with basal planes similar to those of graphene oxide sheets (i.e., GO-GQDs) lack antibacterial property, that prepared by rupturing C60 cage (i.e., C60-GQD) effectively kills Staphylococcus aureus, including its antibiotic-tolerant persisters, but not Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The observed activity may correlate with a GQD's ability to disrupt bacterial cell envelop. Surface-Gaussian-curvature match between a GQD and a target bacterium may play critical role in the association of the GQD with bacterial cell surface, the initial step for cell envelope disruption, suggesting the importance of both GQDs' source materials and bacterial shape.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.5b10132

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 171

Metadata

Authors
Hui, L., Huang, J., Chen, G., Zhu, Y., & Yang, L.
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2015-12-28
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
20-25
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W2201896604
Cited by
171
References
2
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.