Cited by 176Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionFuel Cells and Related MaterialsCatalytic Processes in Materials Science

Co–N Decorated Hierarchically Porous Graphene Aerogel for Efficient Oxygen Reduction Reaction in Acid

Fu, Xiaogang, Choi, Ja-Yeon, Zamani, Pouyan, Jiang, Gaopeng, Hoque, Md. Ariful, Hassan, Fathy Mohamed, Chen, Zhongwei·2016·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

Nitrogen-functionalized graphene materials have been demonstrated as promising electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), owning to their respectable activity and excellent stability in alkaline electrolyte. However, they exhibit unacceptable catalytic activity in acid medium. Here, a hierarchically porous Co-N functionalized graphene aerogel is prepared as an efficient catalyst for the ORR in acid electrolyte. In the preparation process, polyaniline (PANI) is introduced as a pore-forming agent to aid in the self-assembly of graphene species into a porous aerogel networks, and a nitrogen precursor to induce in situ nitrogen doping. Therefore, a Co-N decorated graphene aerogel framework with a large surface area (485 m(2) g(-1)) and an abundance of meso/macropores is effectively formed after heat treatment. Such highly desired structures can not only expose sufficient active sites for the ORR but also guarantee the fast mass transfer in the catalytic process, which provides significant catalytic activity with positive onset and half wave potentials, low hydrogen peroxide yield, high resistance to methanol crossover, and remarkable stability that is comparable to commercial Pt/C in acid medium.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.5b12746

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fu, X., Choi, J.-Y., Zamani, P., Jiang, G., Hoque, M. A., Hassan, F. M., & Chen, Z.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Chen, Zhongwei
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2016-03-03
Volume
8
Issue
10
Pages
6488-6495
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W2288434930
Cited by
176
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 11
FWCI
9.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Waterloo
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • Waterloo Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Waterloo
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
Keywords
oxygen reduction reaction, nitrogen-doped graphene, graphene aerogel, hierarchical porous materials, hydrogen peroxide selectivity, methanol tolerance, catalyst stability, metal-free electrocatalysts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review