The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High-Throughput Synthesis of Lignin Particles (∼30 nm to ∼2 μm) via Aerosol Flow Reactor: Size Fractionation and Utilization in Pickering Emulsions
Abstract
An aerosol flow reactor was used for the first time for high-throughput, high yield synthesis of spherical lignin particles with given inherent hydrophilicity, depending on the precursor biomolecule. In situ fractionation via Berner type impactor afforded populations with characteristic sizes ranging from ∼30 nm to 2 μm. The as-produced, dry lignin particles displayed excellent mechanical integrity, even after redispersion under high shear in either mineral oil or water. They were effective in the stabilization of oil-in-water (O/W) Pickering emulsions with tunable droplet size, depending on the dimension of the lignin particles used for emulsification. The emulsion stability correlated with particle concentration as well as the respective lignin type. For the O/W emulsions stabilized with the more hydrophilic lignin particles, negligible changes in phase separation via Ostwald ripening and coalescence were observed over a period of time of more than two months. Together with the fact that the lignin particle concentrations used in emulsification were as low as 0.1%, our results reveal a remarkable ability to endow emulsified systems with high colloidal stability. Overall, we offer a new, high-yield, scalable nanomanufacturing approach to producing dry spherical lignin particles with size control and high production capacity. A number of emerging applications for these organic particles can be envisioned and, as a proof-of-concept, we illustrate here surfactant-free emulsification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cellulose nanomaterials review: structure, properties and nanocomposites
Moon, R. J., Martini, A., Nairn, J., Simonsen, J., & Youngblood, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c0cs00108b · Cited by 6,756
Sharifi, S., Behzadi, S., Laurent, S., Laird Forrest, M., Stroeve, P., & Mahmoudi, M. (2012) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c1cs15188f · Cited by 1,460
Cited by
Collins, M. N., Nechifor, M., Tanasă, F., Zănoagă, M., McLoughlin, A., Stróżyk, M. A., Culebras, M., & Teacă, C.-A. (2019) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.069 · Cited by 486
Lignin for Nano‐ and Microscaled Carrier Systems: Applications, Trends, and Challenges
Sipponen, M. H., Lange, H., Crestini, C., Henn, A., & Österberg, M. (2019) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201900480 · Cited by 284
Tardy, B. L., Mattos, B. D., Otoni, C. G., Beaumont, M., Majoinen, J., Kämäräinen, T., & Rojas, O. J. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01333 · Cited by 267
Self-citationWang, H., Xiong, F., Tan, Y., Yang, J., Qing, Y., Chu, F., & Wu, Y. (2021) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c08780 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Ago, M., Huan, S., Borghei, M., Raula, J., Kauppinen, E. I., & Rojas, O. J.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-08-25
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 23302-23310
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2517840615
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Throughput Synthesis of Lignin Particles (∼30 nm to ∼2 μm) via Aerosol Flow Reactor: Size Fractionation and Utilization in Pickering Emulsions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsami.6b07900
- The paper
- Ago, M., Huan, S., Borghei, M., Raula, J., Kauppinen, E. I., & Rojas, O. J. (2016). High-Throughput Synthesis of Lignin Particles (∼30 nm to ∼2 μm) via Aerosol Flow Reactor: Size Fractionation and Utilization in Pickering Emulsions. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b07900
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.