The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interfacial Reactivity Benchmarking of the Sodium Ion Conductors Na3PS4 and Sodium β-Alumina for Protected Sodium Metal Anodes and Sodium All-Solid-State Batteries
Abstract
The interfacial stability of solid electrolytes at the electrodes is crucial for an application of all-solid-state batteries and protected electrodes. For instance, undesired reactions between sodium metal electrodes and the solid electrolyte form charge transfer hindering interphases. Due to the resulting large interfacial resistance, the charge transfer kinetics are altered and the overvoltage increases, making the interfacial stability of electrolytes the limiting factor in these systems. Driven by the promising ionic conductivities of Na 3 PS 4, here we explore the stability and viability of Na 3 PS 4 as a solid electrolyte against metallic Na and compare it to that of Na-β″-Al 2 O 3 (sodium β-alumina). As expected, Na-β″-Al 2 O 3 is stable against sodium, whereas Na 3 PS 4 decomposes with an increasing overall resistance, making Na-β″-Al 2 O 3 the electrolyte of choice for protected sodium anodes and all-solid-state batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kirkpatrick, S. (1973) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.45.574 · Cited by 5,260
A solid future for battery development
Janek, J., & Zeier, W. G. (2016) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.141 · Cited by 3,979
Self-citationInterface Stability in Solid-State Batteries
Richards, W. D., Miara, L. J., Wang, Y., Kim, J. C., & Ceder, G. (2016) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04082 · Cited by 1,652
Cited by
Koerver, R., Aygün, I., Leichtweiß, T., Dietrich, C., Zhang, W., Binder, J. O., Hartmann, P., Zeier, W. G., & Janek, J. (2017) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00931 · Cited by 1,020
Self-citationSodium Metal Anodes: Emerging Solutions to Dendrite Growth
Lee, B., Paek, E., Mitlin, D., & Lee, S. W. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00642 · Cited by 940
High-safety separators for lithium-ion batteries and sodium-ion batteries: advances and perspective
Zhang, L., Li, X., Yang, M., & Chen, W. (2021) · Energy Storage Materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2021.06.033 · Cited by 587
Recent developments and insights into the understanding of Na metal anodes for Na-metal batteries
Zhao, Y., Adair, K. R., & Sun, X. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c8ee01373j · Cited by 533
Eshetu, G. G., Elia, G. A., Armand, M., Forsyth, M., Komaba, S., Rojo, T., & Passerini, S. (2020) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.202000093 · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Wenzel, S., Leichtweiss, T., Weber, D. A., Sann, J., Zeier, W. G., & Janek, J.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-10-05
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 28216-28224
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2524301326
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interfacial Reactivity Benchmarking of the Sodium Ion Conductors Na3PS4 and Sodium β-Alumina for Protected Sodium Metal Anodes and Sodium All-Solid-State Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acsami.6b10119
- The paper
- Wenzel, S., Leichtweiss, T., Weber, D. A., Sann, J., Zeier, W. G., & Janek, J. (2016). Interfacial Reactivity Benchmarking of the Sodium Ion Conductors Na3PS4 and Sodium β-Alumina for Protected Sodium Metal Anodes and Sodium All-Solid-State Batteries. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b10119
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
