Cited by 5,260Theoretical and Computational PhysicsStochastic processes and statistical mechanicsMagnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials

Percolation and Conduction

Kirkpatrick, Scott·1973·Reviews of Modern Physics

Abstract

Extensions of percolation theory to treat transport are described. Resistor networks, from which resistors are removed at random, provide the natural generalization of the lattice models for which percolation thresholds and percolation probabilities have previously been considered. The normalized conductance, $G$, of such networks proves to be a sharply defined quantity with a characteristic concentration dependence near threshold which appears sensitive only to dimensionality. Numerical results are presented for several families of $3D$ and $2D$ network models. Except close to threshold, the models based on bond percolation are accurately described by a simple effective medium theory, which can also treat continuous media or situations less drastic than the percolation models, for example, materials in which local conductivity has a continuous distribution of values. The present calculations provide the first quantitative test of this theory. A "Green's function" derivation of the effective medium theory, which makes contact with similar treatments of disordered alloys, is presented. Finally, a general expression for the conductance of a percolation model is obtained which relates $G$ to the spin-stiffness coefficient, $D$, of an appropriately defined model dilute ferromagnet. We use this relationship to argue that the "percolation channels" through which the current flows above threshold must be regarded as three dimensional.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/revmodphys.45.574

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • According to percolation theory, nanowires, nanotubes, or nanofibers are more effective in forming conductive pathways compared to nanoparticles.

    “According to the percolation theory, [10,11] nanowires, nanotubes, or nanofibers are more effective in forming conductive pathways compared to nanoparticles.”

    From Nanomaterial-Enabled Wearable Sensors for Healthcare (2018) · cites this paper as [11]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kirkpatrick, S.
Affiliations
IBM Research - Thomas J. Watson Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Kirkpatrick, Scott
Venue
Reviews of Modern Physics
Published
1973-10-01
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
574-588
ISSN
0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996613237
Cited by
5,260
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 142 · 2025: 132 · 2024: 106 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 145 · 2021: 151 · 2020: 143 · 2019: 184 · 2018: 147 · 2017: 150 · 2016: 163 · 2015: 162 · 2014: 158 · 2013: 150 · 2012: 163
FWCI
25.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials
Keywords
percolation theory, electrical transport, resistor networks, conductance, percolation threshold, bond percolation, effective medium theory, Green's function, dilute ferromagnets, percolation channels, disordered alloys, dimension dependence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review