The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanoengineered Superhydrophobic Surfaces of Aluminum with Extremely Low Bacterial Adhesivity
Open accessAbstract
Bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on surfaces are troublesome in many industrial processes. Here, nanoporous and nanopillared aluminum surfaces were engineered by anodizing and postetching processes and made hydrophilic (using the inherent oxide layer) or hydrophobic (applying a Teflon coating) with the aim of discouraging bacterial adhesion. Adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 12600 (Gram-positive, spherically shaped) and Escherichia coli K-12 (Gram-negative, rod-shaped) was evaluated to the nanoengineered surfaces under both static and flow conditions (fluid shear rate of 37 s –1 ). Compared to a nonstructured electropolished flat surface, the nanostructured surfaces significantly reduced the number of adhering colony forming units (CFUs) for both species, as measured using agar plating. For the hydrophilic surfaces, this was attributed to a decreased contact area, reducing bacterial adhesion forces on nanoporous and nanopillared surfaces to 4 and 2 nN, respectively, from 8 nN on flat surfaces. Reductions in the numbers of adhering CFUs were more marked on hydrophobic surfaces under flow, amounting to more than 99.9% and 99.4% for S. aureus and E. coli on nanopillared surfaces, respectively. Scanning electron microscopy revealed a few bacteria found on the hydrophobic nanopillared surfaces adhered predominantly to defective or damaged areas, whereas the intact area preserving the original nanopillared morphology was virtually devoid of adhering bacteria. The greater decrease in bacterial adhesion to hydrophobic nanopillared surfaces than to hydrophilic or nanoporous ones is attributed to effective air entrapment in the three-dimensional pillar morphology, rendering them superhydrophobic and slippery, in addition to providing a minimized contact area for bacteria to adhere to.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wettability of porous surfaces
Cassie, A. B. D., & Baxter, S. (1944) · Transactions of the Faraday Society · doi:10.1039/tf9444000546 · Cited by 13,807
RESISTANCE OF SOLID SURFACES TO WETTING BY WATER
Wenzel, R. N. (1936) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ie50320a024 · Cited by 13,316
Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—Major pathogens
Scallan, E., Hoekstra, R. M., Angulo, F. J., Tauxe, R. V., Widdowson, M.-A., Roy, S. L., Jones, J. L., & Griffin, P. M. (2011) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1701.p11101 · Cited by 7,657
Cited by
Zheng, S., Bawazir, M., Dhall, A., Kim, H.-E., He, L., Heo, J., & Hwang, G. (2021) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.643722 · Cited by 872
Antimicrobial Copper-Based Materials and Coatings: Potential Multifaceted Biomedical Applications
Mitra, D., Kang, E.-T., & Neoh, K. G. (2020) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.9b17815 · Cited by 322
Surface modifications for antimicrobial effects in the healthcare setting: a critical overview
Adlhart, C., Verran, J., Azevedo, N. F., Olmez, H., Keinänen-Toivola, M. M., Gouveia, I., Melo, L. F., & Crijns, F. (2018) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2018.01.018 · Cited by 308
Arzt, E., Quan, H., McMeeking, R. M., & Hensel, R. (2021) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100823 · Cited by 253
Bioadhesion in the oral cavity and approaches for biofilm management by surface modifications
Sterzenbach, T., Helbig, R., Hannig, C., & Hannig, M. (2020) · Clinical Oral Investigations · doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03646-1 · Cited by 212
Metadata
- Authors
- Hizal, F., Rungraeng, N., Lee, J., Jun, S., Busscher, H. J., van der Mei, H. C., & Choi, C.-H.
- Venue
- ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-03-27
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 12118-12129
- ISSN
- 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8252
- OpenAlex
- W2597349250
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.