Cited by 13,316Surface Modification and SuperhydrophobicityMinerals Flotation and Separation TechniquesAdsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials

RESISTANCE OF SOLID SURFACES TO WETTING BY WATER

Wenzel, Robert N.·1936·Industrial & Engineering Chemistry

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTRESISTANCE OF SOLID SURFACES TO WETTING BY WATERRobert N. WenzelCite this: Ind. Eng. Chem. 1936, 28, 8, 988–994Publication Date (Print):August 1, 1936Publication History Published online1 May 2002Published inissue 1 August 1936https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ie50320a024https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50320a024research-articleACS PublicationsRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views32431Altmetric-Citations10610LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access options Get e-Alerts

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ie50320a024

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For aerophilic surfaces, increasing roughness promotes the transition from aerophilicity to superaerophilicity; conversely, for aerophobic surfaces, increasing roughness results in superaerophobicity.

    “For aerophilic surfaces, the wettability of solid in water follows the Wenzel state (Eq. 14). Increasing the roughness leads to a larger α* and promote the transition from aerophilicity to superaerophilicity. Conversely, increasing the roughness results in superaerophobicity for aerophobic surfaces (Cassie-Baxter state, Eq. 15, Fig. 8c).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wenzel, R. N.
Corresponding author
Wenzel, Robert N.
Venue
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry
Published
1936-08
Volume
28
Issue
8
Pages
988-994
ISSN
  • 0019-7866 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-5724
OpenAlex
W1975140804
Cited by
13,316
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 632 · 2025: 747 · 2024: 705 · 2023: 735 · 2022: 759 · 2021: 848 · 2020: 850 · 2019: 835 · 2018: 727 · 2017: 676 · 2016: 651 · 2015: 634 · 2014: 642 · 2013: 569 · 2012: 570
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Minerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Adsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials
Keywords
wetting resistance, solid surfaces, water wetting, contact angle, surface tension, capillarity, wettability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review