Cited by 110Membrane Separation TechnologiesSurface Modification and SuperhydrophobicityMembrane-based Ion Separation Techniques

Fabrication of Janus Membranes for Desalination of Oil-Contaminated Saline Water

Mohammadi Ghaleni, Mahdi, Al Balushi, Abdullah, Kaviani, Shayan, Tavakoli, Elham, Bavarian, Mona, Nejati, Siamak·2018·ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces

Abstract

Desalination of oil-contaminated saline water using membrane distillation requires hydrophobic membranes with underwater superoleophobic surfaces. For designing such membranes, the chemistry and morphology of the interfacial domains in contact with the contaminated water need to be adjusted such that a stable water layer, adhering to the surface, prevents oil droplets from wetting the membrane. In this article, we present an approach that relies on the controlled functionalization of the surface of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes; we adjust the surface topography of the membranes and introduce chemical heterogeneity to them. We show that the morphology of the PVDF surface can be altered by adjusting the composition of the nonsolvent bath used for the phase inversion process. Also, we render the surface of the membranes hydrophilic by using an alkaline chemical bath solution. The membrane morphology and effectiveness of our chemical treatment were confirmed by atomic force microscopy (AFM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and zeta potential measurements. A stable underwater contact angle, higher than 150°, was observed for both canola oil (ρ ≈ 0.913 g cm -3 , γ ≈ 31.5 mN m -1 ) and hexane (ρ ≈ 0.655 g cm -3 , γ ≈ 18 mN m -1 ). We evaluated the performance of both pristine and functionalized membranes in a laboratory-scale direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD) setup and desalinated a saline solution contam…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsami.8b16621

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mohammadi Ghaleni, M., Al Balushi, A., Kaviani, S., Tavakoli, E., Bavarian, M., & Nejati, S.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Corresponding author
Nejati, Siamak
Venue
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
Published
2018-12-04
Volume
10
Issue
51
Pages
44871-44879
ISSN
  • 1944-8244 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8252
OpenAlex
W2902679488
Cited by
110
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 4
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bureau of Reclamation (R17AC00139)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Membrane Separation Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
Keywords
Janus membranes, membrane distillation, direct contact membrane distillation, desalination, underwater superoleophobicity, PVDF membranes, surface functionalization, phase inversion, surface topography, canola oil, n-hexane, salt rejection, permeate flux

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review