Cited by 51Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchTransgenic Plants and Applications

In Vitro Biocompatibility of Decellularized Cultured Plant Cell-Derived Matrices

Phan, Nhi V., Wright, Tristen, Rahman, M. Masrur, Xu, Jianfeng, Coburn, Jeannine M.·2020·ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering

Abstract

There has been a recent increase in exploring the use of decellularized plant tissue as a novel "green" material for biomedical applications. As part of this effort, we have developed a technique to decellularize cultured plant cells (tobacco BY-2 cells and rice cells) and tissue (tobacco hairy roots) that uses deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I)). As a proof of concept, all cultured plant cells and tissue were transformed to express recombinant enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) to show that the proteins of interest could be retained within the matrices. Decellularization of lyophilized tobacco BY-2 cells with DNase for 30 min depleted the DNA content from 1503 ± 459 to 31 ± 5 ng/sample. The decellularization procedure resulted in approximately 36% total protein retention (154 ± 60 vs 424 ± 70 μg/sample) and 33% EGFP retention. Similar results for DNA removal and protein retention were observed with the rice cells and tobacco hairy root matrices. When exposed to decellularized BY-2 cell-derived matrices, monolayer cultures of human foreskin fibroblasts (hFFs) maintained or increased metabolic activity, which is an indicator of cell viability. Furthermore, hFFs were able to attach, spread, and proliferate when cultured with the decellularized BY-2 cell-derived matrices in an aggregate model. Overall, these studies demonstrate that cultured plant cells and tissue can be effectively decellularized with DNase I with substantial protein retention. The resulting material has a positive impact on hFF metabolic activity and could be employed to create a three-dimensional environment for cell growth. These results thus show the promise of using naturally derived cellulose matrices from cultured plant cells and tissues for biomedical applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b00870

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phan, N. V., Wright, T., Rahman, M. M., Xu, J., & Coburn, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US)
  • Arkansas State University (US)
Corresponding author
Coburn, Jeannine M.
Venue
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
Published
2020-01-08
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
822-832
ISSN
2373-9878 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2999873244
Cited by
51
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3
FWCI
5.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Transgenic Plants and Applications
Keywords
decellularization, cultured plant cells, tobacco BY-2 cells, DNase I, protein retention, green fluorescent protein, human foreskin fibroblasts, biocompatibility, 3D cell culture
MeSH terms
Cells, Cultured, Extracellular Matrix, Humans, Materials Testing, Tissue Scaffolds, Plant Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review