Silk Fibroin: An Emerging Biocompatible Material for Application of Enzymes and Whole Cells in Bioelectronics and Bioanalytical Sciences
Abstract
Enzymes and whole cells serve as the active biological entities in a myriad of applications including bioprocesses, bioanalytics, and bioelectronics. Conserving the natural activity of these functional biological entities during their prolonged use is one of the major goals for validating their practical applications. Silk fibroin (SF) has emerged as a biocompatible material to interface with enzymes as well as whole cells. These biomaterials can be tailored both physically and chemically to create excellent scaffolds of different forms such as fibers, films, and powder for immobilization and stabilization of enzymes. The secondary structures of the SF-protein can be attuned to generate hydrophobic/hydrophilic pockets suitable to create the biocompatible microenvironments. The fibrous nature of the SF protein with a dominant hydrophobic property may also serve as an excellent support for promoting cellular adhesion and growth. This review compiles and discusses the recent literature on the application of SF as a biocompatible material at the interface of enzymes and cells in various fields, including the emerging area of bioelectronics and bioanalytical sciences.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SF is compatible with blood, and scaffolds made from SF exhibit minimal immune response after implantation.
“Additionally, SF has been shown to be compatible with blood, and scaffolds made from SF exhibit minimal immune response after implantation [95].”
From Biomaterials in Postoperative Adhesion Barriers and Uterine Tissue Engineering (2025) · cites this paper as [95]
Cites
Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring
Kim, J., Campbell, A. S., de Ávila, B. E.-F., & Wang, J. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0045-y · Cited by 3,373 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biomaterials in Postoperative Adhesion Barriers and Uterine Tissue Engineering
Fazel Anvari-Yazdi, A., Badea, I., & Chen, X. (2025) · Gels · doi:10.3390/gels11060441 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kaushik, S., Thungon, P. D., & Goswami, P.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Goswami, Pranab
- Venue
- ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2020-06-17
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4337-4355
- ISSN
- 2373-9878 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3036333090
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 0.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Biotechnology , Ministry of Science and Technology (BT/PR13560/ COE/34/44/2015 Project II)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Keywords
- silk fibroin, enzyme immobilization, whole-cell immobilization, bioelectronics, biosensors, biocompatible scaffolds, protein secondary structure, hydrophobic microenvironment, cell adhesion, enzyme stability
- MeSH terms
- Biocompatible Materials, Cell Adhesion, Fibroins, Tissue Scaffolds, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review