Cited by 69Silk-based biomaterials and applicationsEnzyme Catalysis and ImmobilizationElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

Silk Fibroin: An Emerging Biocompatible Material for Application of Enzymes and Whole Cells in Bioelectronics and Bioanalytical Sciences

Kaushik, Sharbani, Thungon, Phurpa Dema, Goswami, Pranab·2020·ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering

Abstract

Enzymes and whole cells serve as the active biological entities in a myriad of applications including bioprocesses, bioanalytics, and bioelectronics. Conserving the natural activity of these functional biological entities during their prolonged use is one of the major goals for validating their practical applications. Silk fibroin (SF) has emerged as a biocompatible material to interface with enzymes as well as whole cells. These biomaterials can be tailored both physically and chemically to create excellent scaffolds of different forms such as fibers, films, and powder for immobilization and stabilization of enzymes. The secondary structures of the SF-protein can be attuned to generate hydrophobic/hydrophilic pockets suitable to create the biocompatible microenvironments. The fibrous nature of the SF protein with a dominant hydrophobic property may also serve as an excellent support for promoting cellular adhesion and growth. This review compiles and discusses the recent literature on the application of SF as a biocompatible material at the interface of enzymes and cells in various fields, including the emerging area of bioelectronics and bioanalytical sciences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01971

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SF is compatible with blood, and scaffolds made from SF exhibit minimal immune response after implantation.

    “Additionally, SF has been shown to be compatible with blood, and scaffolds made from SF exhibit minimal immune response after implantation [95].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaushik, S., Thungon, P. D., & Goswami, P.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IN)
Corresponding author
Goswami, Pranab
Venue
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
Published
2020-06-17
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
4337-4355
ISSN
2373-9878 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3036333090
Cited by
69
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Department of Biotechnology , Ministry of Science and Technology (BT/PR13560/ COE/34/44/2015 Project II)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Keywords
silk fibroin, enzyme immobilization, whole-cell immobilization, bioelectronics, biosensors, biocompatible scaffolds, protein secondary structure, hydrophobic microenvironment, cell adhesion, enzyme stability
MeSH terms
Biocompatible Materials, Cell Adhesion, Fibroins, Tissue Scaffolds, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review