Photocatalytic CO 2 Reduction to C2+ Products
Open accessAbstract
There is a considerable interest in the development of photocatalytic CO 2 conversion by sunlight, since this process has similarities with natural photosynthesis on which life on Earth is based. At the moment, most of the efforts in this field have been aimed at increasing the productivity, rather than at the control of the product distribution. Particularly, compounds with two or more carbons (C2+) have higher added value than methane, carbon monoxide, or formate, which are typically the major products of CO 2 reduction. This review focuses on those reports that have described the formation of compounds of two or more carbon atoms (C2+) in the photocatalytic CO 2 reduction either by H 2 O or as H 2 as a source of electrons and protons. The existing literature has been organized according to the main factor considered to be responsible for the selectivity to C2+ products, including photocatalyst structuration, nature of the co-catalyst, influence of defects, and effects of surface plasmon band. Emphasis has been made on remarking the current empirical knowledge based on experimental results and the lack of predictive capability that could lead to the development of efficient photocatalytic systems for C2+ production.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Valuable fuels such as CO, CH4, CH3OH, HCOOH, and C2+ products have been generated through proton-assisted multiple electron-transfer processes.
“Many valuable fuels, such as CO, CH4, CH3OH, HCOOH, and C2+ products have been generated through proton-assisted multiple electron-transfer processes.306, 307, 308, 309, 310”
From Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality (2021) · cites this paper as [310]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 899
- Authors
- Albero, J., Peng, Y., & García, H.
- Affiliations
- Instituto de Tecnología Química (ES)
- Instituto Universitario de Tecnología Química CSIC-UPV, Universitat Politècnica de València, Avda. De los Naranjos s/n 46022, Valencia, Spain
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2020-04-17
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5734-5749
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3016375773
- Cited by
- 899
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 121 · 2025: 170 · 2024: 178 · 2023: 160 · 2022: 153 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 21
- FWCI
- 21.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- ACS Catalysis (publishedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
- RiuNet (Universitat Politècnica de València) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Generalitat Valenciana (Prometeo 2017-083)
- Universitat Polit??cnica de Val??ncia
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovaci??n (CTQ2018-98237-CO2-1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
- Keywords
- photocatalytic CO2 reduction, C2+ products, product selectivity, cocatalyst, defects, surface plasmon band
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review