The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theoretical Insights into Superior Nitrate Reduction to Ammonia Performance of Copper Catalysts
Abstract
Nitrate reduction to ammonia (NRA) is critical and attractive for environmental remediation and energy conservation. Copper represents one of the most promising non-noble-metal NRA electrocatalysts while its intrinsic catalytic activity of facets and pH influence remain unclear. Using density functional theory calculations, nitrate reduction to ammonia pathways are evaluated on low-index crystal surfaces, Cu(111), Cu(100), and Cu(110), at different pH. Systematic thermodynamic and kinetic analysis indicates that the pathway NO 3 – → *NO 3 → *NO 2 → *NO → *NOH → *NHOH → *NH → *NH 2 → *NH 3 → NH 3 (g) is the most probable in all pH ranges, ending a long-standing debate on NRA pathways. Both the catalytic deoxygenation and hydrogenation processes in NRA are substantially affected by pH. Thus, the rate-determining steps and overpotentials exhibit pH-dependent characteristics. Besides, it is found that the pH influences the competition between the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and NRA. By considering NRA and HER on different surfaces, we found that Cu(100) and Cu(111) contribute most to NRA other than Cu(110). Specifically, in near-neutral and alkaline environments, Cu(111) exhibits the best NO 3 – to NH 3 performance, while Cu(100) is more effective in a strong acidic environment. This result rationalizes recent experimental observations. The NRA activity differences of copper surfaces are attributed to the local coordination environment and electronic states of surface atoms. Thanks to a stereospecific Cu–Cu couple, both strong *NOH adsorption and weak *NH 3 adsorption are realized on Cu(111) and Cu(100), facilitating superior NRA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 · Cited by 215,824
Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set
Kresse, G., & Furthmüller, J. (1996) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.11169 · Cited by 123,652
Projector augmented-wave method
Blöchl, P. E. (1994) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.17953 · Cited by 92,732
Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations
Monkhorst, H. J., & Pack, J. D. (1976) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.13.5188 · Cited by 71,721
Semiempirical GGA‐type density functional constructed with a long‐range dispersion correction
Grimme, S. (2006) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20495 · Cited by 31,038
A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths
Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P., & Jónsson, H. (2000) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1329672 · Cited by 21,620
Origin of the Overpotential for Oxygen Reduction at a Fuel-Cell Cathode
Nørskov, J. K., Rossmeisl, J., Logadottir, A., Lindqvist, L., Kitchin, J. R., Bligaard, T., & Jónsson, H. (2004) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp047349j · Cited by 13,153
An Earth-system perspective of the global nitrogen cycle
Gruber, N., & Galloway, J. N. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06592 · Cited by 3,602
Implicit solvation model for density-functional study of nanocrystal surfaces and reaction pathways
Mathew, K., Sundararaman, R., Letchworth-Weaver, K., Arias, T. A., & Hennig, R. G. (2014) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4865107 · Cited by 3,196
Electronic factors determining the reactivity of metal surfaces
Hammer, B., & Nørskov, J. K. (1995) · Surface Science · doi:10.1016/0039-6028(96)80007-0 · Cited by 2,871
Cited by
Pulsed Nitrate-to-Ammonia Electroreduction Facilitated by Tandem Catalysis of Nitrite Intermediates
Li, P., Li, R., Liu, Y., Xie, M., Jin, Z., & Yu, G. (2023) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.3c00334 · Cited by 466
Gao, Q., Pillai, H. S., Huang, Y., Liu, S., Mu, Q., Han, X., Yan, Z., Zhou, H., He, Q., Xin, H., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29926-w · Cited by 420
Enhancing Electrochemical Nitrate Reduction to Ammonia over Cu Nanosheets via Facet Tandem Catalysis
Fu, Y., Wang, S., Wang, Y., Wei, P., Shao, J., Liu, T., Wang, G., & Bao, X. (2023) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202303327 · Cited by 336
Recent Advances in Electrocatalysts for Efficient Nitrate Reduction to Ammonia
Liu, D., Qiao, L., Peng, S., Bai, H., Liu, C., Ip, W. F., Lo, K. H., Liu, H., Ng, K. W., Wang, S., et al. (2023) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202303480 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, T., Wang, C., Wang, M., Li, C. M., & Guo, C.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2021-11-15
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 14417-14427
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3212240724
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 46
- FWCI
- 11.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theoretical Insights into Superior Nitrate Reduction to Ammonia Performance of Copper Catalysts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acscatal.1c03666
- The paper
- Hu, T., Wang, C., Wang, M., Li, C. M., & Guo, C. (2021). Theoretical Insights into Superior Nitrate Reduction to Ammonia Performance of Copper Catalysts. ACS Catalysis. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c03666
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.