The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pathway Manipulation via Ni, Co, and V Ternary Synergism to Realize High Efficiency for Urea Electrocatalytic Oxidation
Abstract
Ni is the one of most efficient active sites for triggering urea electrooxidation (UOR); however, ’it is hard to achieve higher activity and stability with only the Ni site. To address issues such as dehydrogenation, C–N bond breakage, and catalyst poisoning caused by carbonaceous fragments simultaneously, manipulating a pathway via building a multi-synergistic system is essential. Therefore, we constructed a Co, V co-doped NiS 2 ternary collaborative system to achieve energy-saving urea electrooxidation with an emphasis on catalytic mechanism investigation. The optimal ternary catalyst exhibited good urea electrooxidation activity (77 mA cm –2 at 1.5 V vs RHE), stability, and hydrogen production (143 L min –1 g cat –1 at 1.8 V vs RHE). Based on X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, in situ electrochemical Raman spectroscopy, an in situ electrochemical mass spectrometry isotope tracing experiment, and the density functional theory study, the roles of Ni, Co, and V elements were clearly revealed. The extended superexchange interaction not only enhanced the electron transmission capacity between Ni and S but also accelerated the electron transfer between urea and the catalyst. Anti-CO poisoning experiments indicated that the existence of Co can accelerate the oxidation of carbonaceous intermediate products and improve the catalyst stability. More importantly, we found that N 2 was formed through the urea intermolecular N–N coupling process under the catalysis of metal sulfide. The strategy and mechanism proposed herein give a deeper understanding of UOR catalyzed by metal sulfides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Raman spectroscopy of the eight natural carbonate minerals of calcite structure
Dufresne, W. J. B., Rufledt, C. J., & Marshall, C. P. (2018) · Journal of Raman Spectroscopy · doi:10.1002/jrs.5481 · Cited by 138
Cited by
Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Overall and Hybrid Water Splitting
Quan, L., Jiang, H., Mei, G., Sun, Y., & You, B. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00332 · Cited by 874
Boosting urea electrooxidation on oxyanion-engineered nickel sites via inhibited water oxidation
Gao, X., Bai, X., Wang, P., Jiao, Y., Davey, K., Zheng, Y., & Qiao, S.-Z. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41588-w · Cited by 306
Synergistic Engineering of Doping and Vacancy in Ni(OH)2 to Boost Urea Electrooxidation
Qin, H., Ye, Y., Li, J., Jia, W., Zheng, S., Cao, X., Lin, G., & Jiao, L. (2023) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202209698 · Cited by 281
Xu, S., Ruan, X., Ganesan, M., Wu, J., Ravi, S. K., & Cui, X. (2024) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202313309 · Cited by 264
Highly selective urea electrooxidation coupled with efficient hydrogen evolution
Zhan, G., Hu, L., Li, H., Dai, J., Zhao, L., Zheng, Q., Zou, X., Shi, Y., Wang, J., Hou, W., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50343-8 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Ji, Z., Song, Y., Zhao, S., Li, Y., Liu, J., & Hu, W.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2021-12-21
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 569-579
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4200475356
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.