The DOI matches its Crossref record.
First-Principles-Based Microkinetics Simulations of Synthesis Gas Conversion on a Stepped Rhodium Surface
Open accessAbstract
The kinetics of synthesis gas conversion on the stepped Rh(211) surface were investigated by computational methods. DFT calculations were performed to determine the reaction energetics for all elementary reaction steps relevant to the conversion of CO into methane, ethylene, ethane, formaldehyde, methanol, acetaldehyde, and ethanol. Microkinetics simulations were carried out on the basis of these first-principles data to predict the CO consumption rate and the product distribution as a function of temperature. The elementary reaction steps that control the CO consumption rate and the selectivity were analyzed in detail. Ethanol formation can only occur on the stepped surface, because the barrier for CO dissociation on Rh terraces is too high; step-edges are also required for the coupling reactions. The model predicts that formaldehyde is the dominant product at low temperature, ethanol at intermediate temperature, and methane at high temperature. The preference for ethanol over long hydrocarbon formation is due to the lower barrier for C(H) + CO coupling as compared with the barriers for CH x + CH y coupling reactions. The C(H)CO surface intermediate is hydrogenated to ethanol via a sequence of hydrogenation and dehydrogenation reactions. The simulations show that ethanol formation competes with methane formation at intermediate temperatures. The rate-controlling steps are CO removal as CO 2 to create empty sites for the dehydrogenation steps in the reaction sequence leading to ethanol, CH x CH y O hydrogenation for ethanol formation, and CH 2 and CH 3 hydrogenation for methane formation. CO dissociation does not control the overall reaction rate on Rh. The most important reaction steps that control the selectivity of ethanol over methane are CH 2 and CH 3 hydrogenation as well as CHCH 3 dehydrogenation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Activity and Selectivity Trends in Electrocatalytic Nitrate Reduction on Transition Metals
Liu, J.-X., Richards, D., Singh, N., & Goldsmith, B. R. (2019) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.9b02179 · Cited by 847
Status and prospects in higher alcohols synthesis from syngas
Luk, H. T., Mondelli, C., Ferré, D. C., Stewart, J. A., & Pérez-Ramírez, J. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00324a · Cited by 745
Microkinetic Modeling: A Tool for Rational Catalyst Design
Motagamwala, A. H., & Dumesic, J. A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00394 · Cited by 485
Intrinsic Selectivity and Structure Sensitivity of Rhodium Catalysts for C2+ Oxygenate Production
Yang, N., Medford, A. J., Liu, X., Studt, F., Bligaard, T., Bent, S. F., & Nørskov, J. K. (2016) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b12087 · Cited by 230
Jamaati, M., Torkashvand, M., Sarabadani Tafreshi, S., & de Leeuw, N. H. (2023) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules28186525 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Filot, I. A. W., Broos, R. J. P., van Rijn, J. P. M., van Heugten, G. J. H. A., van Santen, R. A., & Hensen, E. J. M.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2015-08-19
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 5453-5467
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139598701
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First-Principles-Based Microkinetics Simulations of Synthesis Gas Conversion on a Stepped Rhodium Surface. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acscatal.5b01391
- The paper
- Filot, I. A. W., Broos, R. J. P., van Rijn, J. P. M., van Heugten, G. J. H. A., van Santen, R. A., & Hensen, E. J. M. (2015). First-Principles-Based Microkinetics Simulations of Synthesis Gas Conversion on a Stepped Rhodium Surface. ACS Catalysis. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5b01391
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.