Cited by 138Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFuel Cells and Related Materials

Synchrotron-Based In Situ Characterization of Carbon-Supported Platinum and Platinum Monolayer Electrocatalysts

Open access
Sasaki, Kotaro, Marinkovic, Nebojsa, Isaacs, Hugh S., Adzic, Radoslav R.·2016·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

A detailed understanding of oxidation/dissolution mechanisms of Pt is critical in designing durable catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), but exact mechanisms remain unclear. The present work explores the oxidation/dissolution of Pt and Pt monolayer (ML) electrocatalysts over a wide range of applied potentials using cells that facilitate in situ measurements by combining X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements. The X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) measurement demonstrated that Pt nanoparticle surfaces were oxidized from metallic Pt to α-PtO 2 -type oxide during the potential sweep from 0.41 to 1.5 V, and the transition state of O or OH adsorption on Pt and the onset of the place exchange process were revealed by the delta mu (Δμ) method. Only the top layers of Pt nanoparticles were oxidized, while the inner Pt atoms remained intact. At a higher potential over 1.9 V, α-PtO 2 -type surface oxides dissolve due to local acidification caused by the oxygen evolution reaction and carbon corrosion. Pt oxidation of Pt ML on the Pd nanoparticle electrocatalyst is considerably hampered compared with the Pt/C catalyst, presumably because preferential Pd oxidation proceeds at the defects in Pt MLs up to 0.91 V and through O penetrated through the Pt MLs by the place exchange process above 1.11 V.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.5b01862

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sasaki, K., Marinkovic, N., Isaacs, H. S., & Adzic, R. R.
Affiliations
  • Brookhaven National Laboratory (US)
  • Chemical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, United States
  • Chemistry Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, United States
Corresponding author
Sasaki, Kotaro
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2015-12-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
69-76
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2236891857
Cited by
138
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Catalysis (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Basic Energy Sciences (DE-SC0012704)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-SC0012335)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Fuel Cells and Related Materials
Keywords
oxygen reduction reaction, platinum oxidation, platinum dissolution, oxygen evolution reaction, carbon corrosion, acidification, oxygen adsorption, hydroxyl adsorption, Pt/C catalyst, in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review