The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heterogeneous Catalytic Transfer Hydrogenation as an Effective Pathway in Biomass Upgrading
Abstract
Reducing oxygen content in biomass-derived feedstocks via hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) is a key step in their upgrading to fuels and valuable chemicals. Organic molecules, e.g., alcohols and formic acid, can donate hydrogen to reduce the substrate in a process called catalytic transfer hydrogenation (CTH). Although it is practiced far less frequently than molecular-hydrogen-based HDO processes, CTH has been proven to be an efficient and selective strategy in biomass upgrading in the last two decades. In this paper, we present a selective review of recent progress made in the upgrade of biomass-derived feedstocks through heterogeneous CTH, with a focus on the mechanistic interpretation. Hydrogenation and cleavage of C═O and C–O bonds, respectively, are the two main categories of reactions discussed, owing to their importance in the HDO of biomass-derived feedstocks. On acid–base catalysts, Lewis acid–base pair sites, rather than a single acid or base site, mediate hydrogenation of carbonyl groups with alcohols as the hydrogen donor. While acid–base catalysts typically only catalyze the hydrogenation of carbonyl groups with alcohols as the hydrogen donor, metal-based catalysts are able to mediate both hydrogenation and hydrogenolysis reactions with either alcohols or formic acid. Several model reactions involving platform chemicals in biomass upgrading, e.g., 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, levulinic acid, and glycerol, are used in the discussion to illustrate general trends. Because alcohols are typically both the hydrogen donor and the solvent, the donor and solvent effects are intertwined. Therefore, solvent effects are discussed primarily in the context of sugar isomerization and reactions with formic acid as the hydrogen donor, in which the solvent and hydrogen donor are two separate species. Current challenges and opportunities of future research to develop CTH into a competitive and complementary strategy of the conventional molecular-hydrogen-based processes are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Catalytic Valorization of Lignin for the Production of Renewable Chemicals
Zakzeski, J., Bruijnincx, P. C. A., Jongerius, A. L., & Weckhuysen, B. M. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900354u · Cited by 4,468
Cited by
Furfural: A Promising Platform Compound for Sustainable Production of C4 and C5 Chemicals
Li, X., Jia, P., & Wang, T. (2016) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b01838 · Cited by 834
Nie, R., Tao, Y., Nie, Y., Lu, T., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, X., & Xu, C. C. (2021) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c04939 · Cited by 341
Iglesias, J., Martínez-Salazar, I., Maireles-Torres, P., Martin Alonso, D., Mariscal, R., & López Granados, M. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00177e · Cited by 292
Shen, X., Zhang, C., Han, B., & Wang, F. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00908g · Cited by 261
Influence of solvent structure and hydrogen bonding on catalysis at solid–liquid interfaces
Potts, D. S., Bregante, D. T., Adams, J. S., Torres, C., & Flaherty, D. W. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00539a · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilkey, M. J., & Xu, B.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-01-29
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1420-1436
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2313993625
- Cited by
- 811
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 34.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.