The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temperature Dependence of Electrocatalytic and Photocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Reaction Rates Using NiFe Oxide
Abstract
The present work compares the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in electrocatalysis and photocatalysis in aqueous solutions using nanostructured NiFeO x as catalysts. The impacts of pH and reaction temperature on the electrocatalytic and photocatalytic OER kinetics were investigated. For electrocatalysis, a NiFeO x catalyst was hydrothermally decorated on Ni foam. In 1 M KOH solution, the NiFeO x electrocatalyst achieved 10 mA cm –2 at an overpotential of 260 mV. The same catalyst was decorated on the surface of Ta 3 N 5 photocatalyst powder. The reaction was conducted in the presence of 0.1 M Na 2 S 2 O 8 as a strong electron scavenger, thus likely leading to the OER being kinetically relevant. When compared with the bare Ta 3 N 5, NiFeO x /Ta 3 N 5 demonstrated a 5-fold improvement in photocatalytic activity in the OER under visible light irradiation, achieving a quantum efficiency of 24% at 480 nm. Under the conditions investigated, a strong correlation between the electrocatalytic and photocatalytic performances was identified: an improvement in electrocatalysis corresponded with an improvement in photocatalysis without altering the identity of the materials. The rate change at different pH was likely associated with electrocatalytic kinetics that accordingly influenced the photocatalytic rates. The sensitivity of the reaction rates with respect to the reaction temperature resulted in an apparent activation energy of 25 kJ mol –1 in electrocatalysis, whereas the apparent activation energy in photocatalysis was 16 kJ mol –1 . The origin of the difference in these activation energy values is likely attributed to the possible effects of temperature on the individual thermodynamic and kinetic parameters of the reaction process. The work described herein demonstrates a method of “transferring the knowledge of electrocatalysis to photocatalysis” as a strong tool to rationally and quantitatively understand the complex reaction schemes involved in photocatalytic reactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Walter, M. G., Warren, E. L., McKone, J. R., Boettcher, S. W., Mi, Q., Santori, E. A., & Lewis, N. S. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1002326 · Cited by 9,388
Photocatalytic Water Splitting: Recent Progress and Future Challenges
Maeda, K., & Domen, K. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/jz1007966 · Cited by 2,739
Water photolysis at 12.3% efficiency via perovskite photovoltaics and Earth-abundant catalysts
Luo, J., Im, J.-H., Mayer, M. T., Schreier, M., Nazeeruddin, M. K., Park, N.-G., Tilley, S. D., Fan, H. J., & Grätzel, M. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1258307 · Cited by 2,509
Wang, H., Lee, H.-W., Deng, Y., Lu, Z., Hsu, P.-C., Liu, Y., Lin, D., & Cui, Y. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms8261 · Cited by 1,257
Hunter, B. M., Blakemore, J. D., Deimund, M., Gray, H. B., Winkler, J. R., & Müller, A. M. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja506087h · Cited by 321
Cited by
Towards membrane-electrode assembly systems for CO2 reduction: a modeling study
Weng, L.-C., Bell, A. T., & Weber, A. Z. (2019) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c9ee00909d · Cited by 452
Water Electrolysis toward Elevated Temperature: Advances, Challenges and Frontiers
Zhang, W., Liu, M., Gu, X., Shi, Y., Deng, Z., & Cai, N. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00573 · Cited by 441
Yang, M., Gao, M., Hong, M., & Ho, G. W. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201802894 · Cited by 389
Fluorination-enabled Reconstruction of NiFe Electrocatalysts for Efficient Water Oxidation
Xu, Q., Jiang, H., Duan, X., Jiang, Z., Hu, Y., Boettcher, S. W., Zhang, W., Guo, S., & Li, C. (2021) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03950 · Cited by 293
Ullah, N., Zhao, W., Lu, X., Oluigbo, C. J., Shah, S. A., Zhang, M., Xie, J., & Xu, Y. (2019) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2018.12.053 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Nurlaela, E., Shinagawa, T., Qureshi, M., Dhawale, D. S., & Takanabe, K.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2016-02-10
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1713-1722
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2261524625
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.