Cited by 123CO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsElectrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCatalysts for Methane Reforming

Tuned Chemical Bonding Ability of Au at Grain Boundaries for Enhanced Electrochemical CO2 Reduction

Kim, Kang-Sahn, Kim, Won June, Lim, Hyung-Kyu, Lee, Eok Kyun, Kim, Hyungjun·2016·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Electrochemical carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) reduction is an emerging technology for efficiently recycling CO 2 into fuel, and many studies of this reaction are focused on developing advanced catalysts with high activity, selectivity, and durability. Of these catalysts, oxide-derived metal nanoparticles, which are prepared by reducing a metal oxide, have received considerable attention due to their catalytic properties. However, the mechanism of the nanoparticles’ activity enhancement is not well-understood. Recently, it was discovered that the catalytic activity is quantitatively correlated to the surface density of grain boundaries (GBs), implying that GBs are mechanistically important in electrochemical CO 2 reduction. Here, using extensive density functional theory (DFT) calculations modeling the atomistic structure of GBs on the Au (111) surface, we suggest a mechanism of electrochemical CO 2 reduction to CO mediated by GBs; the broken local spatial symmetry near a GB tunes the Au metal-to-adsorbate π-backbonding ability, thereby stabilizing the key COOH intermediate. This stabilization leads to a decrease of ∼200 mV in the overpotential and a change in the rate-determining step to the second reduction step, of which are consistent with previous experimental observations. The atomistic and electronic details of the mechanistic role of GBs during electrochemical CO 2 reduction presented in this work demonstrate the structure–activity relationship of atomically disordered metastable structures in catalytic applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.6b00412

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, K.-S., Kim, W. J., Lim, H.-K., Lee, E. K., & Kim, H.
Affiliations
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Lee, Eok Kyun
  • Kim, Hyungjun
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2016-06-13
Volume
6
Issue
7
Pages
4443-4448
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2416506829
Cited by
123
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACS Catalysis (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (20153030031720)
  • Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2013M3A6B1078884)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Keywords
electrochemical CO2 reduction, grain boundaries, gold nanoparticles, Au(111), COOH intermediate, π-backbonding, spatial symmetry breaking, reaction mechanism, overpotential, rate-determining step, structure-activity relationship

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review