The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
TiO2–x-Modified Ni Nanocatalyst with Tunable Metal–Support Interaction for Water–Gas Shift Reaction
Abstract
The modulation of strong metal–support interaction (SMSI) plays a key role and remains a challenge in achieving the desired catalytic performance in many important chemical reactions. Herein, we report a TiO 2– x -modified Ni nanocatalyst with tunable Ni–TiO 2– x interaction via a two-step procedure: preparation of Ni/Ti mixed metal oxide (NiTi–MMO) from NiTi-layered double hydroxide (NiTi–LDH) precursor, followed by a further reduction treatment at different temperatures. A combination study (XRD, TEM, H 2 -TPR, XPS, and in situ EXAFS) verifies that a high reduction temperature enhances the Ni–TiO 2– x interaction, which results in an increased coverage degree of Ni nanoparticles by TiO 2– x as well as electron density of interfacial Ni (Ni δ− ). Moreover, the creation of a Ni δ− –O v –Ti 3+ interface site (O v denotes oxygen vacancy) induced by strong Ni–TiO 2– x interaction serves as dual-active site to efficiently catalyze the water–gas shift reaction (WGSR). The optimized catalyst (Ni@TiO 2– x (450)) via tuning Ni–TiO 2– x interaction gives a TOF value of 3.8 s –1, which is ∼7 times larger than the conventional 15%Ni/TiO 2 (450) catalyst. Such a high catalytic efficiency is attributed to the interfacial site (Ni δ− –O v –Ti 3+ ) with medium strength of metal–support interaction, as revealed by in situ diffuse reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (in situ DRIFTS), which promotes the synergic catalysis between Ni δ− and oxygen vacancy toward WGSR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Strong metal-support interactions. Group 8 noble metals supported on titanium dioxide
Tauster, S. J., Fung, S. C., & Garten, R. L. (1978) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00469a029 · Cited by 3,188
Bruix, A., Rodriguez, J. A., Ramírez, P. J., Senanayake, S. D., Evans, J., Park, J. B., Stacchiola, D., Liu, P., Hrbek, J., & Illas, F. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja302070k · Cited by 839
Cited by
Zhao, Y., Waterhouse, G. I. N., Chen, G., Xiong, X., Wu, L.-Z., Tung, C.-H., & Zhang, T. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00607e · Cited by 435
Tan, H., Tang, B., Lu, Y., Ji, Q., Lv, L., Duan, H., Li, N., Wang, Y., Feng, S., Li, Z., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29710-w · Cited by 390
Xu, M., Yao, S., Rao, D., Niu, Y., Liu, N., Peng, M., Zhai, P., Man, Y., Zheng, L., Wang, B., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b03117 · Cited by 341
Self-citationBao, D., Huang, L., Gao, Y., Davey, K., Zheng, Y., & Qiao, S.-Z. (2024) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.4c13036 · Cited by 140
Kinetics Driven by Hollow Nanoreactors: An Opportunity for Controllable Catalysis
Yu, Z., Ji, N., Li, X., Zhang, R., Qiao, Y., Xiong, J., Liu, J., & Lu, X. (2023) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202213612 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, M., He, S., Chen, H., Cui, G., Zheng, L., Wang, B., & Wei, M.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2017-10-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 7600-7609
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2758027722
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.