Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 341

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Insights into Interfacial Synergistic Catalysis over Ni@TiO2–x Catalyst toward Water–Gas Shift Reaction

Xu, Ming, Yao, Siyu, Rao, Deming, Niu, Yiming, Liu, Ning, Peng, Mi, Zhai, Peng, Man, Yi, Zheng, Lirong, Wang, Bin, Zhang, Bingsen, Ma, Ding, Wei, Min·2018·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The mechanism on interfacial synergistic catalysis for supported metal catalysts has long been explored and investigated in several important heterogeneous catalytic processes (e.g., water–gas shift (WGS) reaction). The modulation of metal–support interactions imposes a substantial influence on activity and selectivity of catalytic reaction, as a result of the geometric/electronic structure of interfacial sites. Although great efforts have validated the key role of interfacial sites in WGS over metal catalysts supported on reducible oxides, direct evidence at the atomic level is lacking and the mechanism of interfacial synergistic catalysis is still ambiguous. Herein, Ni nanoparticles supported on TiO 2– x (denoted as Ni@TiO 2– x ) were fabricated via a structure topotactic transformation of NiTi-layered double hydroxide (NiTi-LDHs) precursor, which showed excellent catalytic performance for WGS reaction. In situ microscopy was carried out to reveal the partially encapsulated structure of Ni@TiO 2– x catalyst. A combination study including in situ and operando EXAFS, in situ DRIFTS spectra combined with TPSR measurements substantiates a new redox mechanism based on interfacial synergistic catalysis. Notably, interfacial Ni species (electron-enriched Ni δ− site) participates in the dissociation of H 2 O molecule to generate H 2, accompanied by the oxidation of Ni δ− –O v –Ti 3+ (O v: oxygen vacancy) to Ni δ+ –O–Ti 4+ structure. Density functional theory calculations further verify that the interfacial sites of Ni@TiO 2– x catalyst serve as the optimal active site with the lowest activation energy barrier (∼0.35 eV) for water dissociation. This work provides a fundamental understanding on interfacial synergistic catalysis toward WGS reaction, which is constructive for the rational design and fabrication of high activity heterogeneous catalysts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jacs.8b03117

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

See all 341

Metadata

Authors
Xu, M., Yao, S., Rao, D., Niu, Y., Liu, N., Peng, M., Zhai, P., Man, Y., Zheng, L., Wang, B., Zhang, B., Ma, D., & Wei, M.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2018-07-17
Volume
140
Issue
36
Pages
11241-11251
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2882981770
Cited by
341
References
41
FWCI
9.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Insights into Interfacial Synergistic Catalysis over Ni@TiO2–x Catalyst toward Water–Gas Shift Reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/jacs.8b03117
The paper
Xu, M., Yao, S., Rao, D., Niu, Y., Liu, N., Peng, M., Zhai, P., Man, Y., Zheng, L., Wang, B., Zhang, B., Ma, D., & Wei, M. (2018). Insights into Interfacial Synergistic Catalysis over Ni@TiO2–x Catalyst toward Water–Gas Shift Reaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b03117

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.