Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 318

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanistic Understanding and the Rational Design of Sinter-Resistant Heterogeneous Catalysts

Goodman, Emmett D., Schwalbe, Jay A., Cargnello, Matteo·2017·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

The activity and selectivity of heterogeneous catalysts are strong functions of the morphology of the catalytic active phase, which governs both the density and type of active sites. To realize materials with the desired reactivity, cutting-edge catalysts are often the product of novel synthetic strategies and advanced computational studies. Combining these approaches allows for the prediction and fabrication of active motifs in a directed manner. However, catalyst active phases are ordinarily in the nanometer or atomic regime, and small morphological changes can result in large differences in catalytic properties. Given painstaking efforts to design and fabricate active materials at the nanoscale, it is essential that these engineered structures and superior catalytic properties are preserved during working conditions. The stability of a highly active catalyst morphology is crucial for long-term, sustained activity, especially for industrial applications. Unfortunately, catalyst sintering, or processes in which active surface area is lost due to irreversible agglomeration of atomic species or particles, inevitably leads to reduced active surface area and decreased catalytic activity. This problem has led to the development of many schemes, applied with varying degrees of success, which attempt to counteract these aging processes. Undoubtedly, for the directed development of stable, sinter-resistant, heterogeneous catalysts, a fundamental understanding of the species and mechanisms contributing to sintering processes is required. To highlight the importance of fundamental mechanistic understanding of sintering processes, the first portion of this perspective highlights recent approaches to characterize sintering dynamics in heterogeneous catalysts. Next, we showcase recent examples illustrating intentional measures taken to protect against particular sintering mechanisms. We believe that by reviewing examples with mechanistic understanding of these aging phenomena, we can select approaches with the highest probability of successful application to new catalytic systems. These approaches are divided into two main categories: chemical approaches, which are based on modification of the chemistry of the catalytic materials, and physical approaches, based on increased physical barriers to sintering. Our goal is to stimulate more work both on the fundamental understanding of sintering mechanisms, and on the production of stable catalysts by directly targeting and suppressing specific sintering processes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.7b01975

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 318

Metadata

Authors
Goodman, E. D., Schwalbe, J. A., & Cargnello, M.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2017-09-25
Volume
7
Issue
10
Pages
7156-7173
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2756181870
Cited by
318
References
1
FWCI
10.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanistic Understanding and the Rational Design of Sinter-Resistant Heterogeneous Catalysts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acscatal.7b01975
The paper
Goodman, E. D., Schwalbe, J. A., & Cargnello, M. (2017). Mechanistic Understanding and the Rational Design of Sinter-Resistant Heterogeneous Catalysts. ACS Catalysis. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b01975

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.