Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Catalytic Hydrogenolysis of Lignins into Phenolic Compounds over Carbon Nanotube Supported Molybdenum Oxide

Xiao, Ling-Ping, Wang, Shuizhong, Li, Helong, Li, Zhaowei, Shi, Zheng-Jun, Xiao, Liang, Sun, Run-Cang, Fang, Yunming, Song, Guoyong·2017·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Lignin represents the most abundant source of renewable aromatic resources, and the depolymerization of lignin has been identified as a prominent challenge to produce low-molecular-mass aromatic chemicals. Herein, we report a nanostructured MoO x /CNT, which can serve as an efficient catalyst in hydrogenolysis of enzymatic mild acidolysis lignins (EMALs) derived from various lignocellulosic biomass, thus giving monomeric phenols in high yields (up to 47 wt %). This catalyst showed high selectivity toward phenolic compounds having an unsaturated substituent, because the cleavage of C–O bonds in β- O -4 units is prior to reduction of double bonds by MoO x /CNT under a H 2 atmosphere, which was confirmed by examination of lignin model compound reactions. The effects of some key parameters such as the influence of solvent, temperature, reaction time, and catalyst recyclability were also examined in view of monomer yields and average molecular weight. This method constitutes an economically responsible pathway for lignin valorization, which is comparable to the performance of precious-metal catalytic systems in terms of activity, reusability, and biomass feedstock compatibility.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.7b02563

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Xiao, L.-P., Wang, S., Li, H., Li, Z., Shi, Z.-J., Xiao, L., Sun, R.-C., Fang, Y., & Song, G.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2017-10-02
Volume
7
Issue
11
Pages
7535-7542
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2756025005
Cited by
256
References
4
FWCI
11.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.