Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Highly Selective Molecular Catalysts for the CO2-to-CO Electrochemical Conversion at Very Low Overpotential. Contrasting Fe vs Co Quaterpyridine Complexes upon Mechanistic Studies

Cometto, Claudio, Chen, Lingjing, Lo, Po-Kam, Guo, Zhenguo, Lau, Kai-Chung, Anxolabéhère-Mallart, Elodie, Fave, Claire, Lau, Tai-Chu, Robert, Marc·2018·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

[M II (qpy)(H 2 O) 2 ] 2+ (M = Fe, Co; qpy: 2,2′:6′,2″:6″,2‴-quaterpyridine) complexes efficiently catalyze the electrochemical CO 2 -to-CO conversion in acetonitrile solution in the presence of weak Brönsted acids. Upon performing cyclic voltammetry studies, controlled-potential electrolysis, and spectroelectrochemistry (UV–visible and infrared) experiments together with DFT calculations, catalytic mechanisms were deciphered. Catalysis is characterized by high selectivity for CO production (selectivity >95%) in the presence of phenol as proton source. Overpotentials as low as 240 and 140 mV for the Fe and Co complexes, respectively, led to large CO production for several hours. In the former case, the one-electron-reduced species binds to CO 2, and CO evolution is observed after further reduction of the intermediate adduct. A deactivation pathway has been identified, which is due to the formation of a Fe 0 qpyCO species. With the Co catalyst, no such deactivation occurs, and the doubly reduced complex activates CO 2 . High scan rate cyclic voltammetry allows reaching kinetic conditions, leading to scan-rate-independent plateau-shaped voltammograms from which catalytic rate constant was obtained. The molecular catalyst is very active for CO production (turnover a frequency of 3.3 × 10 4 s –1 at 0.3 V overpotential), as confirmed by catalytic a Tafel plot showing a comparison with previous catalysts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.7b04412

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
Cometto, C., Chen, L., Lo, P.-K., Guo, Z., Lau, K.-C., Anxolabéhère-Mallart, E., Fave, C., Lau, T.-C., & Robert, M.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2018-03-13
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
3411-3417
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2789921448
Cited by
191
References
1
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Highly Selective Molecular Catalysts for the CO2-to-CO Electrochemical Conversion at Very Low Overpotential. Contrasting Fe vs Co Quaterpyridine Complexes upon Mechanistic Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acscatal.7b04412
The paper
Cometto, C., Chen, L., Lo, P.-K., Guo, Z., Lau, K.-C., Anxolabéhère-Mallart, E., Fave, C., Lau, T.-C., & Robert, M. (2018). Highly Selective Molecular Catalysts for the CO2-to-CO Electrochemical Conversion at Very Low Overpotential. Contrasting Fe vs Co Quaterpyridine Complexes upon Mechanistic Studies. ACS Catalysis. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b04412

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.