Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tuning Electronic Push/Pull of Ni-Based Hydroxides To Enhance Hydrogen and Oxygen Evolution Reactions for Water Splitting

Zhao, Qinghe, Yang, Jinlong, Liu, Mingqiang, Wang, Rui, Zhang, Guangxing, Wang, Han, Tang, Hanting, Liu, Chaokun, Mei, Zongwei, Chen, Haibiao, Pan, Feng·2018·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

Enhancing the efficiency of non-noble electrocatalysts in hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) for water splitting remains a challenging task. Herein, we report an electronic push/pull effect of Co and Fe doping on the HER and OER performance of Ni-based hydroxides as revealed by thorough cyclic voltammetry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis. A Fe dopant pulls partial electrons from nearby Ni/Co active sites resulting in a higher electron affinity at the Ni/Co sites to facilitate OH – adsorption and charge transfer from the adsorbed OH – for OER. In contrast, a Co dopant tends to push its partial electrons to nearby Ni sites and increase the number of lattice O 2– as proton adsorption sites, which lead to faster charge transfer for HER. By adjusting the contents of Co/Fe dopants in Ni-based hydroxides, we were able to tune the electronic configuration of the catalyst and to optimize the OER and HER performance specifically. An optimized catalyst with a composition of Ni 0.8 Co 0.1 Fe 0.1 O x H y showed excellent OER performance with an overpotential (η) of 239 mV at 10 mA·cm –2 and a Tafel slope of 45.4 mV·dec –1 . The HER performance was optimized with a catalyst composition of Ni 0.9 Co 0.1 O x H y and reached an η of 85 mV at 10 mA·cm –2 and a Tafel slope of 84.5 mV·dec –1 . Overall water splitting with Ni 0.8 Co 0.1 Fe 0.1 O x H y as the anode and Ni 0.9 Co 0.1 O x H y as the cathode was demonstrated at a low potential of 1.58 V at 10 mA·cm –2 . Utilizing the electronic push/pull effect by dopant elements provides a new pathway for the design and optimization of the transition hydroxides as HER and OER catalysts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.8b01567

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 186

Metadata

Authors
Zhao, Q., Yang, J., Liu, M., Wang, R., Zhang, G., Wang, H., Tang, H., Liu, C., Mei, Z., Chen, H., & Pan, F.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2018-05-14
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
5621-5629
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2802280245
Cited by
186
References
5
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.