The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Auδ−–Ov–Ti3+ Interfacial Site: Catalytic Active Center toward Low-Temperature Water Gas Shift Reaction
Abstract
The electronic metal–support interaction (EMSI) plays a crucial role in promoting catalytic performance toward interface electronic structure sensitive reactions, such as the low temperature water gas shift reaction (LT-WGSR). Herein, a mixed metal oxide support (ZnTi-MMO) was obtained via structural topological transformation from a zinc–titanium layered double hydroxides (ZnTi-LDHs) precursor, which was used for the immobilization of Au nanoparticles (NPs). Following a reduction pretreatment at 300 °C in a H 2 atmosphere, the resulting optimal catalyst Au@TiO 2– x /ZnO(H300) exhibits a WGSR rate up to 0.15 mol co mol Au –1 s –1, which is at a high level compared with previously reported gold-based catalyst systems. Ac-HAADF-STEM combined with CO pulse chemisorption measurements verifies a TiO 2– x overlayer on the surface of Au NPs. Quasi in situ XPS, EPR, in situ EXAFS, and in situ DRIFTS demonstrate the formation of interface dual-active-site (Au δ− –O v –Ti 3+; O v: oxygen vacancy) based on electron transfer from the TiO 2– x overlayer to Au atoms, in which the electron-enriched Au δ− species enhance CO chemisorption while O v –Ti 3+ accelerates the dissociation of the H 2 O molecule, accounting for the largely enhanced catalytic activity and stability of Au@TiO 2– x /ZnO(H300) compared with the traditional Au/TiO 2 system. In situ / operando EXAFS further confirms that Au δ− –O v –Ti 3+ interfacial site serves as the optimal active site toward WGSR: both Au δ− species and O v directly participate in the rate-determining step of LT-WGSR (water dissociation). The discovery and identification of the interfacial active site in this system can be extended to other metal catalysts with largely promoted performance in heterogeneous catalysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Strong metal-support interactions. Group 8 noble metals supported on titanium dioxide
Tauster, S. J., Fung, S. C., & Garten, R. L. (1978) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00469a029 · Cited by 3,188
Bruix, A., Rodriguez, J. A., Ramírez, P. J., Senanayake, S. D., Evans, J., Park, J. B., Stacchiola, D., Liu, P., Hrbek, J., & Illas, F. (2012) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja302070k · Cited by 839
Cited by
Water Splitting: From Electrode to Green Energy System
Li, X., Zhao, L., Yu, J., Liu, X., Zhang, X., Liu, H., & Zhou, W. (2020) · Nano-Micro Letters · doi:10.1007/s40820-020-00469-3 · Cited by 619
Tan, H., Tang, B., Lu, Y., Ji, Q., Lv, L., Duan, H., Li, N., Wang, Y., Feng, S., Li, Z., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-29710-w · Cited by 390
Zhao, M., Deng, J., Liu, J., Li, Y., Liu, J., Duan, Z., Xiong, J., Zhao, Z., Wei, Y., Song, W., et al. (2019) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.9b01995 · Cited by 266
Bao, D., Huang, L., Gao, Y., Davey, K., Zheng, Y., & Qiao, S.-Z. (2024) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.4c13036 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, N., Xu, M., Yang, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, J., Wang, W., Zheng, L., Hong, S., & Wei, M.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-02-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2707-2717
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2914196391
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.