Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 471

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In Situ/Operando Techniques for Characterization of Single-Atom Catalysts

Open access
Li, Xuning, Yang, Xiaofeng, Zhang, Junming, Huang, Yanqiang, Liu, Bin·2019·ACS Catalysis

Abstract

In situ/operando characterization techniques are powerful to provide fundamental information about molecular structure–activity/selectivity relationships for various catalytic systems under controlled condition. However, the lack of model catalyst, as the major obstacle for deeper understanding on the nature of active sites and reaction mechanisms, hinders the further advancements in catalysis. Fortunately, the rapid development of single-atom catalysts (SACs) offers us new opportunities for capturing the reaction intermediates, identifying the active sites, and even monitoring the dynamic behaviors of both the geometric structure and electronic environment of the catalytic sites at atomic scale. In this Perspective, the recent advances on the in situ/operando characterization techniques including X-ray absorption spectroscopy, scanning tunneling microscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, among other methods, for the characterization of SACs are thoroughly summarized. The results from these in situ/operando measurements reveal the crucial role of SACs as model systems for sharpening our understanding on the nature of catalytic sites. Furthermore, the challenges and outlooks in developing in situ/operando techniques for single-atom catalysis are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acscatal.8b04937

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 471

Metadata

Authors
Li, X., Yang, X., Zhang, J., Huang, Y., & Liu, B.
Venue
ACS Catalysis
Published
2019-02-07
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
2521-2531
ISSN
2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2911598292
Cited by
471
References
2
FWCI
18.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.