The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Two-Dimensional Mosaic Bismuth Nanosheets for Highly Selective Ambient Electrocatalytic Nitrogen Reduction
Abstract
Electrochemical fixation of N 2 to ammonia is a promising strategy to store renewable energy and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. However, it usually suffers from extremely low ammonia yield and Faradaic efficiency because of the lack of efficient electrocatalysts and the competing hydrogen evolution reaction. Herein, we report that the semiconducting bismuth can be a promising catalyst for ambient electrocatalytic N 2 reduction reaction (NRR). A two-dimensional mosaic bismuth nanosheet (Bi NS) was fabricated via an in situ electrochemical reduction process and exhibited favorable average ammonia yield and Faradaic efficiency as high as 2.54 ± 0.16 μg NH 3 cm –2 h –1 (∼13.23 μg mg cat. –1 h –1 ) and 10.46 ± 1.45% at −0.8 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode in 0.1 M Na 2 SO 4 . The high NRR electrocatalytic activity of the Bi NS could be attributed to the sufficient exposure of edge sites coupled with effective p-orbital electron delocalization in the mosaic bismuth nanosheets. In addition, the semiconducting feature, which limits surface electron accessibility, could effectively enhance the Faradaic efficiency. This work highlights the potential importance of less reactive main group elements with tunable p-electron density, semiconducting property, and ingenious nanostructure for further exploration of N 2 reduction reaction electrocatalysts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future
Chu, S., & Majumdar, A. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11475 · Cited by 12,550
Montoya, J. H., Tsai, C., Vojvodic, A., & Nørskov, J. K. (2015) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201500322 · Cited by 1,384
Cited by
Wang, Y., Zhou, W., Jia, R., Yu, Y., & Zhang, B. (2020) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201915992 · Cited by 1,641
Yang, Y., & Mu, T. (2021) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d1gc00914a · Cited by 539
Greatly Improving Electrochemical N 2 Reduction over TiO 2 Nanoparticles by Iron Doping
Wu, T., Zhu, X., Xing, Z., Mou, S., Li, C., Qiao, Y., Liu, Q., Luo, Y., Shi, X., Zhang, Y., et al. (2019) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201911153 · Cited by 499
Atomic‐Level Reactive Sites for Semiconductor‐Based Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction
Zhang, Y., Xia, B., Ran, J., Davey, K., & Qiao, S. Z. (2020) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201903879 · Cited by 423
Self-citation2D V‐V Binary Materials: Status and Challenges
Guo, S., Zhang, Y., Ge, Y., Zhang, S., Zeng, H., & Zhang, H. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201902352 · Cited by 363
Wu, Y., Li, Y., Gao, J., & Zhang, Q. (2021) · SusMat · doi:10.1002/sus2.3 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, L., Tang, C., Xia, B., Jin, H., Zheng, Y., & Qiao, S.-Z.
- Venue
- ACS Catalysis
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2019-02-21
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 2902-2908
- ISSN
- 2155-5435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2916158247
- Cited by
- 570
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.