Cited by 2Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingChemical Synthesis and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Novel Substrate Prediction for the TAM Family of RTKs Using Phosphoproteomics and Structure-Based Modeling

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The TAM family of receptor tyrosine kinases is implicated in multiple distinct oncogenic signaling pathways. However, to date, there are no FDA-approved small molecule inhibitors for the TAM kinases. Inhibitor design and screening rely on tools to study the kinase activity. Our goal was to address this gap by designing a set of synthetic peptide substrates for each of the TAM family members: Tyro3, Axl, and Mer. We used an in vitro phosphoproteomics workflow to determine the substrate profile of each TAM kinase and input the identified substrates into our data processing pipeline, KINATEST-ID, producing a position-specific scoring matrix for each target kinase and generating a list of candidate synthetic peptide substrates. We synthesized and characterized a set of those substrate candidates, systematically measuring their initial phosphorylation rate with each TAM kinase by LC-MS. We also used the multimer modeling function of AlphaFold2 (AF2) to predict peptide-kinase interactions at the active site for each of the novel candidate peptide sequences against each of the TAM family kinases and observed that, remarkably, every sequence for which it predicted a putative catalytically competent interaction was also demonstrated biochemically to be a substrate for one or more of the TAM kinases. This work shows that kinase substrate design can be achieved using a combination of preference motifs and structural modeling, and it provides the first demonstration of peptide-protein interaction modeling with AF2 for predicting the likelihood of constructive catalytic interactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acschembio.3c00549

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1016/S0065-230X(08)00002-X · DOI
  2. 10.1126/science.1061663 · DOI
  3. 10.4049/jimmunol.178.9.5635 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/ni.2986 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/nrc3847 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.04.019 · DOI
  7. 10.1172/JCI67816 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209633 · DOI
  9. 10.1074/jbc.M114.570838 · DOI
  10. 10.1172/JCI67655 · DOI
  11. 10.3390/cancers10120474 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.11.028 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.0909292106 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.bbrep.2021.101111 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/hep.29478 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/onc.2012.355 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/onc.2011.588 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/pcmr.12110 · DOI
  19. 10.1111/imr.12522 · DOI
  20. 10.1172/jci.insight.97941 · DOI
  21. 10.1073/pnas.2023868118 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.01.014 · DOI
  23. 10.1172/JCI139434 · DOI
  24. 10.1021/acschembio.2c00106 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/nar/gku1267 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1074/mcp.RA118.001111 · DOI
  27. 10.1021/acs.biochem.8b00044 · DOI
  28. Evans R., 2021, Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer, 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00500 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Widstrom, N. E., Andrianov, G. V., Heier, J. L., Heier, C., Karanicolas, J., & Parker, L. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Fox Chase Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Parker, Laurie L.
Venue
ACS Chemical Biology
Published
2023-12-30
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
117-128
ISSN
  • 1554-8929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-8937
OpenAlex
W4390439776
Cited by
2
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Chemical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health (P30CA006927, R01CA182543, R01GM146386, T32CA009138, R01GM141513)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
TAM receptor tyrosine kinases, kinase substrate prediction, synthetic peptide substrates, Tyro3, AXL, Mer, position weight matrices, kinase inhibitors, oncogenic signaling
MeSH terms
Axl Receptor Tyrosine Kinase, Furylfuramide, Peptides, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review