Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 491

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NanoBRET—A Novel BRET Platform for the Analysis of Protein–Protein Interactions

Open access
Machleidt, Thomas, Woodroofe, Carolyn C., Schwinn, Marie K., Méndez, Jacqui, Robers, Matthew B., Zimmerman, Kris, Otto, Paul, Daniels, Danette L., Kirkland, Thomas A., Wood, Keith V.·2015·ACS Chemical Biology

Abstract

Dynamic interactions between proteins comprise a key mechanism for temporal control of cellular function and thus hold promise for development of novel drug therapies. It remains technically challenging, however, to quantitatively characterize these interactions within the biologically relevant context of living cells. Although, bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) has often been used for this purpose, its general applicability has been hindered by limited sensitivity and dynamic range. We have addressed this by combining an extremely bright luciferase (Nanoluc) with a means for tagging intracellular proteins with a long-wavelength fluorophore (HaloTag). The small size (19 kDa), high emission intensity, and relatively narrow spectrum (460 nm peak intensity) make Nanoluc luciferase well suited as an energy donor. By selecting an efficient red-emitting fluorophore (635 nm peak intensity) for attachment onto the HaloTag, an overall spectral separation exceeding 175 nm was achieved. This combination of greater light intensity with improved spectral resolution results in substantially increased detection sensitivity and dynamic range over current BRET technologies. Enhanced performance is demonstrated using several established model systems, as well as the ability to image BRET in individual cells. The capabilities are further exhibited in a novel assay developed for analyzing the interactions of bromodomain proteins with chromatin in living cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acschembio.5b00143

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 491

Metadata

Authors
Machleidt, T., Woodroofe, C. C., Schwinn, M. K., Méndez, J., Robers, M. B., Zimmerman, K., Otto, P., Daniels, D. L., Kirkland, T. A., & Wood, K. V.
Venue
ACS Chemical Biology
Published
2015-06-09
Volume
10
Issue
8
Pages
1797-1804
ISSN
  • 1554-8929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-8937
OpenAlex
W2399229449
Cited by
491
References
3
FWCI
13.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NanoBRET—A Novel BRET Platform for the Analysis of Protein–Protein Interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/acschembio.5b00143
The paper
Machleidt, T., Woodroofe, C. C., Schwinn, M. K., Méndez, J., Robers, M. B., Zimmerman, K., Otto, P., Daniels, D. L., Kirkland, T. A., & Wood, K. V. (2015). NanoBRET—A Novel BRET Platform for the Analysis of Protein–Protein Interactions. ACS Chemical Biology. https://doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.5b00143

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.