Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsRNA Research and SplicingAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 26 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

A Proline-Rich-Domain-Binding Single Domain Antibody Selectively Inhibits RNA-Induced Phase Separation of Tau

Open access
Thiou, Simon, Martin, Leslie, Manousaki, Evangelia, Nguyen, Marine, Mortelecque, Justine, Heidsieck, Leila, Cantrelle, François-Xavier, Blum, David, Buée-Scherrer, Valérie, Buée, Luc, Landrieu, Isabelle, Dupré, Elian, Danis, Clément·2026·ACS Chemical Neuroscience

Abstract

Phase separation mediates the formation of biomolecular condensates, which organize cellular processes such as synaptic plasticity in neurons. The neuronal protein tau undergoes phase separation under specific conditions, regulating synaptic vesicle clustering and microtubule dynamics. In vitro, tau phase separation is induced by cofactors such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) or RNA, mainly via weak multivalent electrostatic interactions. However, the molecular mechanisms governing the formation of tau phase separation, including domain specific contribution, remain unclear. In this study, we used eight single-domain antibodies (VHHs), targeting six distinct short sequences of tau, to explore the mechanisms of tau phase separation in vitro. By combining several biophysical methods, we evaluated the effect of each anti-tau VHH on tau phase separation. With PEG as an inducer, VHHs A31 and Z70 targeting the tau microtubule binding domain enhanced tau phase separation by increasing the droplet size. With RNA as an inducer, the effect of the VHHs was mixed: VHH F8-2 targeting the C-terminal domain promoted condensation, while VHH B1-1, which binds the proline-rich domain (PRD), abolished droplet formation. Nuclear magnetic resonance and surface plasmon resonance spectroscopies confirmed 1 to 1 binding of VHH B1-1 to the PRD, and competition assays with a PRD peptide restored phase separation, demonstrating mechanistic specificity. Our findings provide domain-resolved insights into the regulation of tau phase separation and introduce VHHs as selective probes to modulate biomolecular condensates in physiological and pathological contexts.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

Eight anti-tau single-domain antibodies (VHHs) were used to probe domain-specific regulation of tau phase separation in vitro. VHH B1-1, binding the tau proline-rich domain, selectively abolished RNA-induced tau droplet formation, while other VHHs enhanced PEG- or RNA-induced condensation.

Key findings

  • Under PEG crowding, all anti-tau VHHs increased tau turbidity; VHH Z70, F8-2, and E2-2 increased OD400 more than 1.5-fold (OD400 = 1.84 ± 0.38, 1.73 ± 0.25, and 1.76 ± 0.25, respectively). VHHs A31 and Z70 increased total labeled droplet surface area (37.6 and 40.4 μm²) compared with tau PEG and anti-V5 controls (18.7 and 30.1 μm²).
  • Under RNA coacervation, VHH F8-2 enhanced tau droplet formation by 30% (OD400 = 1.30 ± 0.13), whereas VHH B1-1 inhibited it (OD400 = 0.13 ± 0.18). DLS showed RNA-induced tau droplets at Rh ~450 nm, while B1-1 disrupted them to smaller particles (Rh = 24.4 ± 1.9 nm).
  • VHH B1-1 bound the tau PRD epitope 221REPKKVAVVRTPPKSPSSAKSRLQT245; SPR with peptide 221REPKKVAVVRTP232 gave KD = 4.3 ± 1.3 μM and stoichiometric ratio SR = 0.7, confirming 1:1 binding. Competition with PRD peptide restored RNA-induced phase separation with EC50 = 4 μM.
  • NMR and SPR indicated RNA and VHH B1-1 affected overlapping tau regions in the PRD and R2-R3 repeats, but B1-1 did not directly bind the isolated tau MTBD.

Methods

  • Eight VHHs targeting six distinct tau sequences were tested against recombinant tau2N4R. Phase separation was induced by 7% PEG (10 μM tau) or 50 μg/mL RNA polyA (20 μM tau), with VHHs at 1:1 molar ratio unless dose effects were assessed.
  • Biophysical assays included OD400 turbidity, phase diagrams, dynamic light scattering, confocal fluorescence microscopy, FRAP, NMR spectroscopy, surface plasmon resonance, yeast two-hybrid epitope mapping, and a heparin-induced tau aggregation assay.
  • Main analyses normalized OD400 to tau phase-separation controls, quantified total labeled droplet surface, droplet number and size, and correlated turbidity with microscopy using Pearson correlation (r = 0.85 for PEG; r = 0.79 for RNA).

Limitations

  • The paper states that the work is in vitro and that the cellular environment, with complex binding partners, post-translational modifications, and crowding agents, may affect tau phase separation in ways not captured. It also states that whether regulating tau phase separation is a viable therapeutic strategy remains an open question.
  • Evident from the text: RNA polyA is a model inducer rather than a specific cellular RNA; the VHH panel covers only six tau regions; RNA-induced microscopy showed more variability than PEG experiments; and the heparin-induced aggregation assay with VHH B1-1 was n = 1 performed in triplicate.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acschemneuro.6c00110

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 0 Not valid · 16 Not checked · 120 Own results and interpretations

96 more claims

Create a free account to see all 136 claims and to verify the 22 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 25
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 10
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

4 of 4

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Thiou, S., Martin, L., Manousaki, E., Nguyen, M., Mortelecque, J., Heidsieck, L., Cantrelle, F.-X., Blum, D., Buée-Scherrer, V., Buée, L., Landrieu, I., Dupré, E., & Danis, C.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Univ. Lille, CNRS, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR9031 - BSI - Integrative Structural Biology
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU-Lille, U1172 - LilNCog - Lille Neuroscience & Cognition
Corresponding author
Danis, Clément
Venue
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
Published
2026-05-08
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
1955-1970
ISSN
1948-7193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7160604819
Cited by
1
References
35
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Chemical Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11LABX-01, ANR-18-CE44-0016, ANR-22CE92-0061)
  • Alzheimer's Association (T-PEP-23-969176)
  • Rainwater Charitable Foundation (T-PEP-23-969176)
  • HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (GA101119596)
  • Fondation pour la Recherche M?dicale (SMC202405019)
  • Association France Alzheimer (6433)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
tau protein, phase separation, biomolecular condensates, nanobodies, VHH, proline-rich region, microtubule-binding domain, C-terminal domain, droplet formation, electrostatic interactions, protein-protein binding, neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Protein Domains, Phase Separation, Animals, Humans, Proline, Protein Binding, RNA, tau Proteins, Single-Domain Antibodies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-13, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-13 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.