Cited by 432Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsProtein Structure and DynamicsElectron Spin Resonance Studies

Global Hairpin Folding of Tau in Solution

Jeganathan, Sadasivam, von Bergen, Martin, Brutlach, Henrik, Steinhoff, Heinz-Jürgen, Mandelkow, Eckhard·2006·Biochemistry

Abstract

The microtubule-associated protein tau stabilizes microtubules in its physiological role, whereas it forms insoluble aggregates (paired helical filaments) in Alzheimer's disease. Soluble tau is considered a natively unfolded protein whose residual folding and intramolecular interactions are largely undetermined. In this study, we have applied fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) to examine the proximity and flexibility of tau domains and the global folding. FRET pairs spanning the tau molecule were created by inserting tryptophans (donor) and cysteines (labeled with IAEDANS as an acceptor) by site-directed mutagenesis. The observed FRET distances were significantly different from those expected for a random coil. Notably, the C-terminal end of tau folds over into the vicinity of the microtubule-binding repeat domain, the N-terminus remains outside the FRET distance of the repeat domain, yet both ends of the molecule approach one another. The interactions between the domains were obliterated by denaturation in GdnHCl. Paramagnetic spin-labels attached in various domains of tau were analyzed by EPR and exhibited a high mobility throughout. The data indicate that tau retains some global folding even in its "natively unfolded" state, combined with the high flexibility of the chain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/bi0521543

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jeganathan, S., von Bergen, M., Brutlach, H., Steinhoff, H.-J., & Mandelkow, E.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Unit for Structural Molecular Biology, Notkestrasse 85, D-22607 Hamburg, Germany, and Department of Physics, University of Osnabruck, D-49069 Osnabruck, Germany
  • Osnabrück University (DE)
Venue
Biochemistry
Published
2006-01-28
Volume
45
Issue
7
Pages
2283-2293
ISSN
  • 0006-2960 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-4995
OpenAlex
W2104034347
Cited by
432
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 26
FWCI
7.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electron Spin Resonance Studies
Keywords
tau protein, intrinsically disordered proteins, protein flexibility, domain interactions, Alzheimer's disease, paired helical filaments
MeSH terms
Circular Dichroism, Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy, Naphthalenesulfonates, Solutions, Mutagenesis, Site-Directed, tau Proteins, Protein Folding, Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review