Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An Active and Robust Air Electrode for Reversible Protonic Ceramic Electrochemical Cells

Open access
Zhou, Yucun, Liu, Enzuo, Chen, Yu, Liu, Yuchen, Zhang, Lei, Zhang, Weilin, Luo, Zheyu, Kane, Nicholas, Zhao, Bote, Soule, Luke, Niu, Yinghua, Ding, Yong, Ding, Hanping, Ding, Dong, Liu, Meilin·2021·ACS Energy Letters

Abstract

Reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells (R-PCECs) are a promising option for efficient and low-cost generation of electricity and hydrogen. Commercialization of R-PCECs, however, hinges on the development of highly active and robust air electrodes. Here, we report an air electrode consisting of PrBa 0.8 Ca 0.2 Co 2 O 5+δ and in situ exsolved BaCoO 3−δ nanoparticles (PBCC–BCO) that shows minimal polarization resistance (∼0.24 Ω cm 2 at 600 °C) and high stability when exposed to humidified air with 3−50% H 2 O. An R-PCEC utilizing PBCC-BCO demonstrates remarkable performances at 600 °C: achieving a peak power density of 1.06 W cm –2 in the fuel cell mode and a current density of 1.51 A cm –2 at 1.3 V in an electrolysis mode. More importantly, the R-PCECs demonstrate an exceptionally high durability over 1833 h of continuous operation in the electrolysis mode. This work offers an efficient approach to design of high-performance and durable electrodes for R-PCECs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c00432

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, Y., Liu, E., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, L., Zhang, W., Luo, Z., Kane, N., Zhao, B., Soule, L., Niu, Y., Ding, Y., Ding, H., Ding, D., & Liu, M.
Venue
ACS Energy Letters
Published
2021-03-26
Pages
1511-1520
ISSN
2380-8195 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3141824881
Cited by
284
References
0
FWCI
11.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.