Cited by 150Advanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesAdvancements in Battery MaterialsAdvanced Battery Technologies Research

Detrimental Effects of Chemical Crossover from the Lithium Anode to Cathode in Rechargeable Lithium Metal Batteries

Lee, Hongkyung, Lim, Hyung-Seok, Ren, Xiaodi, Yu, Lu, Engelhard, Mark H., Han, Kee Sung, Lee, Jinhong, Kim, Hee-Tak +4 more·2018·ACS Energy Letters

Abstract

Interfacial stability is one of the crucial factors for long-term cyclability of lithium (Li) metal batteries (LMBs). While cross-contamination phenomena have been well-studied in Li-ion batteries (LIBs), similar phenomena have rarely been reported in LMBs. Here, we investigated cathode failure triggered by chemical crossover from the anode in LMBs. In contrast to LIBs, the cathode in LMBs suffers more significant capacity fading, and its capacity cannot be fully recovered by replacing the Li anode. In-depth surface characterization reveals severe deterioration related to the accumulation of highly resistive polymeric components in the cathode–electrolyte interphase. The soluble byproducts generated by extensive electrolyte decomposition at the Li metal surface can diffuse toward the cathode side, resulting in severe deterioration of the cathode and separator surfaces. A selective Li-ion permeable separator with a polydopamine coating has been developed to mitigate the detrimental chemical crossover and enhance the cathode stability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b01819

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, H., Lim, H.-S., Ren, X., Yu, L., Engelhard, M. H., Han, K. S., Lee, J., Kim, H.-T., Xiao, J., Liu, J., Xu, W., & Zhang, J.-G.
Affiliations
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
  • Energy & Environment Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), 902 Battelle Boulevard, Richland, Washington 99354, United States
  • Department of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
  • Xu, Wu
  • Zhang, Ji-Guang
Venue
ACS Energy Letters
Published
2018-11-09
Volume
3
Issue
12
Pages
2921-2930
ISSN
2380-8195 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2900175974
Cited by
150
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACS Energy Letters (publishedVersion)
Funders
Vehicle Technologies Program (DE-AC02-05CH11231)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
Keywords
lithium metal batteries, cathode degradation, capacity fade, cathode electrolyte interphase, polydopamine coating, interfacial stability, cycling stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review